Literature DB >> 2226028

[Preoperative assessment of perirectal lymph nodes by ultrasound].

F Glaser1, G Layer, I Zuna, G van Kaick, P Schlag, C Herfarth.   

Abstract

Endorectal ultrasound is a new technique which is having an increasing impact on the surgical community. Beyond the assessment of tumor penetration depth two kinds of lymph nodes are to be differentiated by ultrasound in the perirectal fat. 1) Inflammatory enlarged lymph nodes which appear hyperechoic, unsharply limited to the surrounding tissue and 2) lymph node metastases which are hypoechoic having the same density as the tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of endorectal ultrasound in the detection of lymph node metastases in 97 patients was 80%, the positive predictive value was 78%, the negative 82%. In an in vitro study we examined 27 lymph nodes of patients with either inflammatory or cancerous colon diseases by computerized B-scan texture analysis. An HP-77020 A realtime electronic sector-scanner was connected with HP-1000 microcomputer which permitted the selection and texture-analysis of a region of interest (ROI). Afterwards the lymph nodes were examined histologically. Independent of size and surrounding fat tissue there was a highly significant difference between inflammatory and cancerous enlarged lymph nodes concerning mean grey level and mean gradient. Tumor infiltrated lymph nodes are hypoechoic with poor contrast within the node whereas inflammatory enlarged nodes are more hyperechoic and show more contrast. Thus, we can state that it is possible by consideration of echogenity and contrast to distinguish sonographically between tumor infiltrated and inflammatory enlarged lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2226028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  8 in total

1.  Endosonographic examination of gastrointestinal anastomoses with suspected locoregional tumor recurrence.

Authors:  C Müller; G Kähler; J Scheele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Quantitative methods in sonography].

Authors:  K-V Jenderka; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Shirley Y W Liu; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  S A Badger; P B Devlin; P J D Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Three-dimensional endosonography for staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Hünerbein; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  [Imaging modalities in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  P Hohenberger; M Hünerbein; B Gebauer; Ch Stroszczynski
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  The value of endosonographic rectal carcinoma staging in routine diagnostics: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  W K H Kauer; L Prantl; H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endorectal ultrasound for control of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Glaser; C Kuntz; P Schlag; C Herfarth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.