Literature DB >> 22260101

The effects of different chilling methods on meat quality and calpain activity of pork muscle longissimus dorsi.

Yang Xu1, Ji-Chao Huang, Ming Huang, Bao-Cai Xu, Guang-Hong Zhou.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of conventional chilling (0 to 4 °C), rapid chilling (RC, -20 °C for 30 min, followed by 0 to 4 °C), and short-duration chilling (0 to 4 °C for 30 min, followed by 25 °C) on meat quality and calpain activity of pork muscle longissimus dorsi (LD). The muscle quality characteristics pH, color, cooking loss, pressing loss and tenderness, and calpain activities were measured 0-, 3-, 12-, and 24-h postmortem. Results show that the RC resulted in a faster temperature decline of the muscle, and prevented the meat pH and Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L* value from declining during postmortem aging. RC also reduced meat cooking loss and pressing loss compared with the other two chilling methods. However, the chilling methods did not significantly affect meat shear force. During the first 24-h postmortem, there was not a noticeable change in the activity of m-calpain. But μ-calpain activity decreased regardless of chilling method. In the rapidly chilled carcasses, μ-calpain activity remained the same 3- and 12-h postmortem. However, in the short-duration chilled and conventionally chilled carcasses, the activity was visibly reduced. At 24-h postmortem, no clear zones on the gel were observed in all three treatments. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Conventional and RC methods are commonly used for pork in commercial practice nowadays. Compared with conventional chilling, the effect of RC on quality parameters of pork varies. In recent years, short-duration chilling (SC) is widely used in many Chinese pig slaughtering facilities. However, few researchers have studied the effect of SD on pork quality. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of different chilling methods on functionalities or quality of chilled pork meat.
© 2011 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22260101     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02440.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  6 in total

1.  Differences in carcass chilling rate underlie differences in sensory traits of pork chops from pigs with heavier carcass weights.

Authors:  Hannah E Price; Kayla E Barkley; Annie B Lerner; Bailey N Harsh; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Travis G O'Quinn; Matt W Allerson; Brandon Fields; David A King; Tommy L Wheeler; Steven D Shackelford; Dustin D Boler; Anna C Dilger
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Pork Quality Traits According to Postmortem pH and Temperature in Berkshire.

Authors:  Tae Wan Kim; Chul Wook Kim; Mi Ra Yang; Gun Ryoung No; Sam Woong Kim; Il-Suk Kim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Effect of three kinds of natural preservative cocktails on vacuum-packed chilled pork.

Authors:  Chen Li; Yuhang Han; Sanhong Fan; Lizhen Ma; Yi Zhang; Benjamin Kofi Simpson
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Changes in the Quality of Chicken Breast Meat due to Superchilling and Temperature Fluctuations during Storage.

Authors:  Pensiri Kaewthong; Luigi Pomponio; Jorge R Carrascal; Susanne Knøchel; Saowakon Wattanachant; Anders H Karlsson
Journal:  J Poult Sci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.425

Review 5.  Endogenous Proteolytic Systems and Meat Tenderness: Influence of Post-Mortem Storage and Processing.

Authors:  Lovedeep Kaur; Seah Xin Hui; James D Morton; Ramandeep Kaur; Feng Ming Chian; Mike Boland
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Evaluation of Meat Color and Physiochemical Characteristics in Forequarter Muscles of Holstein Steers.

Authors:  Sung Sil Moon; Pil-Nam Seong; Jin Young Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.622

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.