Sujin Kim1, Woojae Kim, Rae Woong Park. 1. College of Communication and Information Studies and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The intensive care environment generates a wealth of critical care data suited to developing a well-calibrated prediction tool. This study was done to develop an intensive care unit (ICU) mortality prediction model built on University of Kentucky Hospital (UKH)'s data and to assess whether the performance of various data mining techniques, such as the artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and decision trees (DT), outperform the conventional logistic regression (LR) statistical model. METHODS: The models were built on ICU data collected regarding 38,474 admissions to the UKH between January 1998 and September 2007. The first 24 hours of the ICU admission data were used, including patient demographics, admission information, physiology data, chronic health items, and outcome information. RESULTS: Only 15 study variables were identified as significant for inclusion in the model development. The DT algorithm slightly outperformed (AUC, 0.892) the other data mining techniques, followed by the ANN (AUC, 0.874), and SVM (AUC, 0.876), compared to that of the APACHE III performance (AUC, 0.871). CONCLUSIONS: With fewer variables needed, the machine learning algorithms that we developed were proven to be as good as the conventional APACHE III prediction.
OBJECTIVES: The intensive care environment generates a wealth of critical care data suited to developing a well-calibrated prediction tool. This study was done to develop an intensive care unit (ICU) mortality prediction model built on University of Kentucky Hospital (UKH)'s data and to assess whether the performance of various data mining techniques, such as the artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and decision trees (DT), outperform the conventional logistic regression (LR) statistical model. METHODS: The models were built on ICU data collected regarding 38,474 admissions to the UKH between January 1998 and September 2007. The first 24 hours of the ICU admission data were used, including patient demographics, admission information, physiology data, chronic health items, and outcome information. RESULTS: Only 15 study variables were identified as significant for inclusion in the model development. The DT algorithm slightly outperformed (AUC, 0.892) the other data mining techniques, followed by the ANN (AUC, 0.874), and SVM (AUC, 0.876), compared to that of the APACHE III performance (AUC, 0.871). CONCLUSIONS: With fewer variables needed, the machine learning algorithms that we developed were proven to be as good as the conventional APACHE III prediction.
Entities:
Keywords:
APACHE; Decision Trees; Intensive Care Units; Neural Networks; Support Vector Machines
Authors: B Sierra; N Serrano; P Larrañaga; E J Plasencia; I Inza; J J Jiménez; P Revuelta; M L Mora Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: Michael Green; Jonas Björk; Jakob Forberg; Ulf Ekelund; Lars Edenbrandt; Mattias Ohlsson Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: E D Crawford; J T Batuello; P Snow; E J Gamito; D G McLeod; A W Partin; N Stone; J Montie; R Stock; J Lynch; J Brandt Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Steven Ganzert; Josef Guttmann; Kristian Kersting; Ralf Kuhlen; Christian Putensen; Michael Sydow; Stefan Kramer Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: Ashish Nimgaonkar; Dilip R Karnad; S Sudarshan; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Isaac Kohane Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Marco Carone; Matthieu Resche Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Mark J van der Laan Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Patrick J Tighe; Amanda C Filiberto; Philip A Efron; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Parisa Rashidi; Gilbert R Upchurch; Azra Bihorac Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766