Sandra Mangiapane1, Reinhard Busse. 1. Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 3, 10623 Berlin, Germany. smangiapane@zi-berlin.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although there is evidence that patients often stop taking these medications prematurely, long-term data reflecting the actual reality of care are lacking. We studied prescription prevalence and treatment persistence of secondary prevention in patients who had an AMI by analyzing relevant claims data from a German sickness fund, the Techniker Krankenkasse (these data are not necessarily representative of the entire German population). METHODS: Insurees who were discharged from the hospital between 2001 and 2006 with AMI as their main discharge diagnosis were classified as users or non-users of each of the types of drug listed above on the basis of the prescriptions that they obtained in the first 90 days after they left the hospital. Treatment persistence was statistically assessed with survival analysis. Switches from one drug class to another were not examined. RESULTS: Of 30,028 AMI patients, 82% were initially prescribed a beta-blocker, 73% a statin, 69% an ACE inhibitor, 66% aspirin (without self-medication), and 61% clopidogrel. Five years after discharge, 10% of the patients for whom aspirin was initially prescribed were still taking it; the corresponding figures for the other drug classes were 17% for statins, 31% for ACE inhibitors, and 36% for beta-blockers. The greatest drop in treatment persistence occurred approximately one year after the AMI. CONCLUSION: Treatment persistence with recommended medication after AMI is still in need of improvement. Patient education should start as soon as possible after infarction, because the greatest drops in medication use appear to occur within one year after AMI.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although there is evidence that patients often stop taking these medications prematurely, long-term data reflecting the actual reality of care are lacking. We studied prescription prevalence and treatment persistence of secondary prevention in patients who had an AMI by analyzing relevant claims data from a German sickness fund, the Techniker Krankenkasse (these data are not necessarily representative of the entire German population). METHODS: Insurees who were discharged from the hospital between 2001 and 2006 with AMI as their main discharge diagnosis were classified as users or non-users of each of the types of drug listed above on the basis of the prescriptions that they obtained in the first 90 days after they left the hospital. Treatment persistence was statistically assessed with survival analysis. Switches from one drug class to another were not examined. RESULTS: Of 30,028 AMI patients, 82% were initially prescribed a beta-blocker, 73% a statin, 69% an ACE inhibitor, 66% aspirin (without self-medication), and 61% clopidogrel. Five years after discharge, 10% of the patients for whom aspirin was initially prescribed were still taking it; the corresponding figures for the other drug classes were 17% for statins, 31% for ACE inhibitors, and 36% for beta-blockers. The greatest drop in treatment persistence occurred approximately one year after the AMI. CONCLUSION: Treatment persistence with recommended medication after AMI is still in need of improvement. Patient education should start as soon as possible after infarction, because the greatest drops in medication use appear to occur within one year after AMI.
Authors: Michel E Bertrand; Maarten L Simoons; Keith A A Fox; Lars C Wallentin; Christian W Hamm; Eugene McFadden; Pim J De Feyter; Giuseppe Specchia; Witold Ruzyllo Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-10-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L Køber; C Torp-Pedersen; J E Carlsen; H Bagger; P Eliasen; K Lyngborg; J Videbaek; D S Cole; L Auclert; N C Pauly Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-12-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Frans Van de Werf; Diego Ardissino; Amadeo Betriu; Dennis V Cokkinos; Erling Falk; Keith A A Fox; Desmond Julian; Maria Lengyel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Witold Ruzyllo; Christian Thygesen; S Richard Underwood; Alec Vahanian; Freek W A Verheugt; William Wijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sebastian Klose; René Pflock; Inke R König; Roland Linder; Markus Schwaninger Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Birga Maier; Katrin Wagner; Steffen Behrens; Leonhard Bruch; Reinhard Busse; Dagmar Schmidt; Helmut Schühlen; Roland Thieme; Heinz Theres Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Barbara Bohn; Christof Schöfl; Vincent Zimmer; Michael Hummel; Nikolai Heise; Erhard Siegel; Wolfram Karges; Michaela Riedl; Reinhard W Holl Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 9.951