Literature DB >> 22259552

1,2-Bis(dibromo-meth-yl)benzene.

Sin-Kai Fang1, Hong-Yi Lin, Kew-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(6)Br(4), intra-molecular C-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds generate two S(6) rings. The two geminal bromine-atom substituents point to opposite sides of the aromatic ring system. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by inter-molecular π-π inter-actions with centroid-centroid distances of 3.727 (9) and 3.858 (9) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259552      PMCID: PMC3254285          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811050616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the preparation of the title compound, see: Ghorbani-Vaghei et al. (2009 ▶). For its applications, see: Chen et al. (2002 ▶, 2006 ▶, 2007 ▶); Chow et al. (2005 ▶); Jansen et al. (2010 ▶); Pandithavidana et al. (2009 ▶); Swartz et al. (2005 ▶). For related structures, see: Kuś & Jones (2003) ▶; Qin et al. (2005 ▶); Sim et al. (2001 ▶). For graph-set theory, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H6Br4 M = 421.77 Triclinic, a = 7.0222 (8) Å b = 7.7313 (9) Å c = 10.5927 (12) Å α = 108.473 (10)° β = 97.108 (9)° γ = 90.394 (9)° V = 540.61 (11) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 14.83 mm−1 T = 297 K 0.58 × 0.48 × 0.36 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.122, T max = 1.000 4575 measured reflections 2469 independent reflections 1297 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.073

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.091 wR(F 2) = 0.258 S = 1.04 2469 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.62 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.27 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811050616/aa2031sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811050616/aa2031Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811050616/aa2031Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H6Br4Z = 2
Mr = 421.77F(000) = 388
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.591 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.0222 (8) ÅCell parameters from 1856 reflections
b = 7.7313 (9) Åθ = 2.8–29.1°
c = 10.5927 (12) ŵ = 14.83 mm1
α = 108.473 (10)°T = 297 K
β = 97.108 (9)°Parallelepiped, colorless
γ = 90.394 (9)°0.58 × 0.48 × 0.36 mm
V = 540.61 (11) Å3
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer2469 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1297 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.073
ω scansθmax = 29.2°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −9→8
Tmin = 0.122, Tmax = 1.000k = −10→10
4575 measured reflectionsl = −14→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.091Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.258H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0875P)2 + 18.1246P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2469 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 1.62 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.27 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br11.0868 (3)0.1807 (3)0.90582 (19)0.0434 (6)
Br20.6361 (3)0.1787 (3)0.9231 (2)0.0492 (6)
Br30.5867 (3)0.5842 (3)0.7641 (2)0.0488 (6)
Br41.0292 (3)0.5783 (3)0.7275 (2)0.0478 (6)
C10.832 (3)0.078 (3)0.8116 (17)0.036 (4)
H1A0.8311−0.05330.80030.043*
C20.796 (2)0.094 (2)0.6741 (16)0.030 (4)
C30.769 (2)−0.070 (3)0.5681 (18)0.035 (4)
H3A0.7804−0.18030.58620.042*
C40.725 (2)−0.073 (2)0.4342 (17)0.033 (4)
H4A0.7044−0.18210.36390.040*
C50.714 (2)0.097 (3)0.4101 (16)0.032 (4)
H5A0.69240.10040.32240.039*
C60.735 (2)0.255 (2)0.5136 (16)0.031 (4)
H6A0.71830.36440.49540.037*
C70.781 (2)0.261 (2)0.6455 (15)0.024 (3)
C80.821 (2)0.436 (2)0.7532 (17)0.033 (4)
H8A0.85330.41230.83870.040*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0330 (10)0.0605 (15)0.0388 (10)0.0108 (9)−0.0006 (8)0.0207 (10)
Br20.0364 (11)0.0769 (17)0.0443 (11)0.0028 (10)0.0117 (9)0.0313 (11)
Br30.0386 (11)0.0406 (13)0.0671 (14)0.0169 (9)0.0072 (9)0.0165 (11)
Br40.0406 (11)0.0372 (13)0.0653 (14)−0.0084 (8)0.0102 (9)0.0148 (10)
C10.047 (10)0.027 (10)0.041 (10)−0.009 (8)0.002 (8)0.024 (8)
C20.019 (7)0.033 (11)0.033 (9)0.003 (7)0.000 (6)0.008 (8)
C30.016 (8)0.038 (11)0.051 (11)0.004 (7)0.006 (7)0.014 (9)
C40.040 (10)0.026 (10)0.033 (9)0.005 (7)0.017 (8)0.003 (8)
C50.024 (8)0.042 (11)0.025 (8)0.015 (7)0.008 (7)−0.001 (8)
C60.042 (10)0.015 (9)0.029 (8)0.006 (7)0.009 (7)−0.003 (7)
C70.019 (7)0.026 (9)0.032 (8)0.003 (6)0.007 (6)0.013 (7)
C80.032 (9)0.030 (11)0.038 (9)−0.011 (7)0.003 (7)0.014 (8)
Br1—C11.965 (17)C3—H3A0.9300
Br2—C11.932 (19)C4—C51.42 (3)
Br3—C82.003 (18)C4—H4A0.9300
Br4—C81.922 (15)C5—C61.35 (2)
C1—C21.49 (2)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—H1A0.9800C6—C71.38 (2)
C2—C71.42 (2)C6—H6A0.9300
C2—C31.40 (2)C7—C81.47 (2)
C3—C41.41 (2)C8—H8A0.9800
C2—C1—Br2113.8 (12)C6—C5—C4120.4 (16)
C2—C1—Br1112.7 (11)C6—C5—H5A119.8
Br2—C1—Br1110.0 (9)C4—C5—H5A119.8
C2—C1—H1A106.6C5—C6—C7122.7 (17)
Br2—C1—H1A106.6C5—C6—H6A118.6
Br1—C1—H1A106.6C7—C6—H6A118.6
C7—C2—C3119.0 (16)C6—C7—C2118.7 (15)
C7—C2—C1124.9 (15)C6—C7—C8120.6 (15)
C3—C2—C1116.0 (16)C2—C7—C8120.7 (14)
C4—C3—C2121.2 (17)C7—C8—Br4112.8 (11)
C4—C3—H3A119.4C7—C8—Br3110.0 (11)
C2—C3—H3A119.4Br4—C8—Br3108.1 (9)
C5—C4—C3117.9 (16)C7—C8—H8A108.6
C5—C4—H4A121.1Br4—C8—H8A108.6
C3—C4—H4A121.1Br3—C8—H8A108.6
Br2—C1—C2—C761.2 (18)C5—C6—C7—C8174.1 (15)
Br1—C1—C2—C7−65.0 (19)C3—C2—C7—C62(2)
Br2—C1—C2—C3−117.0 (14)C1—C2—C7—C6−176.1 (15)
Br1—C1—C2—C3116.9 (14)C3—C2—C7—C8−175.9 (14)
C7—C2—C3—C4−1(2)C1—C2—C7—C86(2)
C1—C2—C3—C4177.2 (14)C6—C7—C8—Br4−58.1 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C52(2)C2—C7—C8—Br4119.7 (14)
C3—C4—C5—C6−3(2)C6—C7—C8—Br362.6 (16)
C4—C5—C6—C75(3)C2—C7—C8—Br3−119.6 (13)
C5—C6—C7—C2−4(2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C8—H8A···Br10.982.643.364 (16)131
C8—H8A···Br20.982.783.420 (16)124
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C8—H8A⋯Br10.982.643.364 (16)131
C8—H8A⋯Br20.982.783.420 (16)124
  7 in total

1.  A new type of soluble pentacene precursor for organic thin-film transistors.

Authors:  Kew-Yu Chen; Hsing-Hung Hsieh; Chung-Chih Wu; Jiunn-Jye Hwang; Tahsin J Chow
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Intramolecular electronic interactions between nonconjugated arene and quinone chromophores.

Authors:  Georg Jansen; Björn Kahlert; Frank-Gerrit Klärner; Roland Boese; Dieter Bläser
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Synthesis and characterization of electron-deficient pentacenes.

Authors:  Christopher R Swartz; Sean R Parkin; Joseph E Bullock; John E Anthony; Alex C Mayer; George G Malliaras
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  6,7-Bis(bromomethyl)-2,11,18,21,24-pentaoxatetracyclo.

Authors:  W Sim; J Y Lee; J S Kim; J G Kim; I H Suh
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Tuning excited-state electron transfer from an adiabatic to nonadiabatic type in donor-bridge-acceptor systems and the associated energy-transfer process.

Authors:  Kew-Yu Chen; Cheng-Chih Hsieh; Yi-Ming Cheng; Chin-Hung Lai; Pi-Tai Chou; Tahsin J Chow
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Photochemical generation and reversible cycloaromatization of a nine-membered ring cyclic enediyne.

Authors:  Dinesh R Pandithavidana; Andrei Poloukhtine; Vladimir V Popik
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.