Literature DB >> 22259517

Tetra-gonal polymorph of 5,5-dichloro-barbituric acid.

Thomas Gelbrich1, Denise Rossi, Ulrich J Griesser.   

Abstract

The tetra-gonal polymorph of 5,5-dichloro-barbituric acid (m.p. 478 K), C(4)H(2)Cl(2)N(2)O(3), forms an N-H⋯O hydrogen-bonded tape structure along [001]. Two tapes related by a twofold rotation axis are associated via Cl⋯O contacts [3.201 (1) Å], and four such chain pairs are arranged around a fourfold roto-inversion axis. The crystal structures of the monoclinic and ortho-rhom-bic polymorphs have been reported previously [Gelbrich et al. (2011 ▶). CrystEngComm, 13, 5502-5509].

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259517      PMCID: PMC3254567          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811054626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

The polymorphic nature of 5,5-dichloro­barbituric acid was mentioned in Groth’s compendium on the chemical crystallography of organic compounds, published more than a hundred years ago (Groth, 1910 ▶). For the monoclinic and ortho­rhom­bic polymorphs, see: Gelbrich et al. (2011 ▶). For related structures, see: Gartland & Craven (1971 ▶); Gelbrich et al. (2007 ▶, 2010 ▶, 2010a ▶,b ▶); Nichol & Clegg (2007 ▶); Zencirci et al. (2009 ▶, 2010 ▶); DesMarteau et al. (1994 ▶). For a description of the synthesis, see: Ziegler et al. (1962 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶); Etter et al. (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H2Cl2N2O3 M = 196.98 Tetragonal, a = 13.8883 (3) Å c = 6.9126 (2) Å V = 1333.34 (6) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.92 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.20 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby Gemini ultra diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.837, T max = 0.955 11025 measured reflections 1310 independent reflections 1242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.020 wR(F 2) = 0.050 S = 1.07 1310 reflections 107 parameters 2 restraints All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 541 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: −0.08 (7) Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811054626/su2351sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811054626/su2351Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811054626/su2351Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H2Cl2N2O3Dx = 1.963 Mg m3
Mr = 196.98Melting point: 478 K
Tetragonal, P421cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P -4 2nCell parameters from 5173 reflections
a = 13.8883 (3) Åθ = 2.9–29.3°
c = 6.9126 (2) ŵ = 0.92 mm1
V = 1333.34 (6) Å3T = 173 K
Z = 8Needle, colourless
F(000) = 7840.20 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby Gemini ultra diffractometer1310 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance Ultra (Mo) X-ray Source1242 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
mirrorRint = 0.041
ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2003)h = −17→17
Tmin = 0.837, Tmax = 0.955k = −16→17
11025 measured reflectionsl = −7→8
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullAll H-atom parameters refined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0266P)2 + 0.2183P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.050(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
1310 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
107 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
2 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0046 (8)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 541 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: −0.08 (7)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.40679 (3)0.41812 (3)0.32982 (7)0.01953 (13)
Cl20.26242 (3)0.27671 (3)0.22840 (7)0.01938 (13)
O20.53042 (10)0.10721 (9)−0.1061 (2)0.0225 (3)
O40.37178 (9)0.39086 (9)−0.0966 (2)0.0178 (3)
O60.44620 (11)0.22096 (11)0.4808 (2)0.0260 (4)
N10.48923 (11)0.16639 (11)0.1869 (2)0.0158 (3)
N30.44480 (11)0.24555 (11)−0.0993 (2)0.0127 (3)
C20.49068 (12)0.16895 (13)−0.0125 (3)0.0134 (4)
C40.40209 (13)0.32207 (12)−0.0102 (3)0.0120 (4)
C50.38637 (12)0.30971 (12)0.2083 (3)0.0131 (4)
C60.44390 (12)0.22935 (13)0.3078 (3)0.0148 (4)
H10.5202 (13)0.1184 (10)0.233 (3)0.018*
H30.4508 (14)0.2465 (15)−0.2243 (14)0.018*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0247 (2)0.0140 (2)0.0199 (2)0.0036 (2)−0.0065 (2)−0.00722 (19)
Cl20.0156 (2)0.0263 (2)0.0162 (2)−0.00433 (19)0.00163 (18)0.00387 (19)
O20.0286 (8)0.0197 (7)0.0193 (7)0.0098 (6)0.0067 (6)−0.0037 (6)
O40.0212 (7)0.0149 (7)0.0172 (7)0.0031 (5)0.0002 (6)0.0056 (6)
O60.0414 (9)0.0266 (8)0.0100 (7)0.0112 (7)−0.0030 (6)0.0013 (6)
N10.0221 (8)0.0124 (7)0.0128 (8)0.0072 (6)−0.0019 (7)0.0002 (7)
N30.0165 (8)0.0151 (8)0.0065 (7)0.0004 (6)0.0010 (6)−0.0011 (7)
C20.0122 (9)0.0134 (9)0.0148 (10)−0.0017 (7)0.0013 (8)0.0001 (8)
C40.0091 (9)0.0132 (9)0.0136 (9)−0.0027 (7)−0.0006 (8)−0.0006 (7)
C50.0133 (8)0.0130 (8)0.0129 (9)0.0006 (7)0.0007 (7)−0.0046 (7)
C60.0173 (9)0.0140 (9)0.0130 (10)−0.0002 (7)−0.0021 (7)−0.0006 (8)
Cl1—C51.7471 (18)N1—H10.856 (9)
Cl2—C51.7868 (18)N3—C41.364 (2)
O2—C21.208 (2)N3—C21.378 (2)
O4—C41.203 (2)N3—H30.868 (9)
O6—C61.202 (2)C4—C51.536 (3)
N1—C61.363 (2)C5—C61.535 (2)
N1—C21.379 (2)
C6—N1—C2127.07 (17)N3—C4—C5114.75 (16)
C6—N1—H1120.1 (14)C6—C5—C4116.60 (15)
C2—N1—H1112.9 (14)C6—C5—Cl1109.07 (12)
C4—N3—C2127.31 (17)C4—C5—Cl1110.70 (13)
C4—N3—H3118.6 (14)C6—C5—Cl2106.27 (12)
C2—N3—H3113.6 (14)C4—C5—Cl2104.00 (12)
O2—C2—N3121.74 (17)Cl1—C5—Cl2109.88 (10)
O2—C2—N1121.60 (18)O6—C6—N1122.37 (18)
N3—C2—N1116.65 (16)O6—C6—C5122.00 (17)
O4—C4—N3123.15 (18)N1—C6—C5115.60 (16)
O4—C4—C5121.84 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3···O6i0.87 (1)2.07 (1)2.923 (2)167.(2)
N1—H1···O2ii0.86 (1)2.05 (1)2.881 (2)165 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N3—H3⋯O6i0.87 (1)2.07 (1)2.923 (2)167 (2)
N1—H1⋯O2ii0.86 (1)2.05 (1)2.881 (2)165 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

3.  Hydrogen-bond motifs in N-monosubstituted derivatives of barbituric acid: 5-allyl-5-isopropyl-1-methylbarbituric acid (enallylpropymal) and 1,5-di(but-2-enyl)-5-ethylbarbituric acid.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Neslihan Zencirci; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  A polymorph of butobarbital with two distinct hydrogen-bonding motifs.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Neslihan Zencirci; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Butallyl-onal 1,4-dioxane hemisolvate.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Denise Rossi; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-30

6.  5,5-Dihydroxy-barbituric acid 1,4-dioxane hemisolvate.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Denise Rossi; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-30
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Order-parameter-aided temperature-accelerated sampling for the exploration of crystal polymorphism and solid-liquid phase transitions.

Authors:  Tang-Qing Yu; Pei-Yang Chen; Ming Chen; Amit Samanta; Eric Vanden-Eijnden; Mark Tuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Crystal polymorphs of barbital: news about a classic polymorphic system.

Authors:  Neslihan Zencirci; Ulrich J Griesser; Thomas Gelbrich; David C Apperley; Robin K Harris
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Specific energy contributions from competing hydrogen-bonded structures in six polymorphs of phenobarbital.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Doris E Braun; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Lack of Cooperativity in the Triangular X3 Halogen-Bonded Synthon?

Authors:  Justyna Dominikowska; Agnieszka J Rybarczyk-Pirek; Célia Fonseca Guerra
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  The Hydrogen Bonded Structures of Two 5-Bromobarbituric Acids and Analysis of Unequal C5-X and C5-X' Bond Lengths (X = X' = F, Cl, Br or Me) in 5,5-Disubstituted Barbituric Acids.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Doris E Braun; Stefan Oberparleiter; Herwig Schottenberger; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Crystals (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.589

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.