Literature DB >> 22258411

Selective tumor killing based on specific DNA-damage response deficiencies.

Michael Biss1, Wei Xiao.   

Abstract

Organisms constantly undergo various stresses within their life span, which can damage their DNA. In order to maintain genomic stability and counteract the development of unwanted genomic mutations, organisms have evolved a DNA-damage response (DDR) to protect their genome. Due to the critical roles played by DDR in genomic stability, its defects can lead to cellular transformation and potentially tumorigenesis. Consequently, this also provides the opportunity to specifically target tumor cells due to a weakened ability to tolerate genotoxic stresses. In this lies a treatment strategy in which the inhibition of remaining DDR pathways can hyper-sensitize tumors to chemotherapeutic agents while minimizing deleterious effects to healthy cells. Therefore it is important to understand the genotypic background of specific tumors to determine which DDR pathways remain and can be targeted for inhibition. Tumor therapies based on the DDR are ideal not only as a means of increasing the effectiveness of current chemotherapies but also as a means to selectively target tumor cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed. Thus, targeting DDR components as a means of increasing effectiveness and discrimination of current chemotherapeutic tumor treatments is currently the focus of many studies and clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258411      PMCID: PMC3367714          DOI: 10.4161/cbt.18921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  118 in total

1.  Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Philip M Reaper; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The relationship of premature mitosis to cytotoxicity in response to checkpoint abrogation and antimetabolite treatment.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Theodore S Lawrence; Jonathan Maybaum
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Activated checkpoint kinase 2 provides a survival signal for tumor cells.

Authors:  Jagadish C Ghosh; Takehiko Dohi; Christopher M Raskett; Timothy F Kowalik; Dario C Altieri
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  BRIT1 regulates early DNA damage response, chromosomal integrity, and cancer.

Authors:  Rekha Rai; Hui Dai; Asha S Multani; Kaiyi Li; Koei Chin; Joe Gray; John P Lahad; Jiyong Liang; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Shiaw-Yih Lin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Differential roles of checkpoint kinase 1, checkpoint kinase 2, and mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 in mediating DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zhan Xiao; John Xue; Thomas J Sowin; Haiying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient tumor cells are hypersensitive to inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia mutated.

Authors:  Richard D Kennedy; Clark C Chen; Patricia Stuckert; Elyse M Archila; Michelle A De la Vega; Lisa A Moreau; Akiko Shimamura; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Schisandrin B enhances doxorubicin-induced apoptosis of cancer cells but not normal cells.

Authors:  Ling Li; Qinghua Lu; Yanwei Shen; Xun Hu
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 8.  Current development of clinical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in oncology.

Authors:  Kapila Ratnam; Jennifer A Low
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5'-DNA junctions.

Authors:  Jerzy Majka; Sara K Binz; Marc S Wold; Peter M J Burgers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Biochemical and cellular characterization of VRX0466617, a novel and selective inhibitor for the checkpoint kinase Chk2.

Authors:  Luigi Carlessi; Giacomo Buscemi; Gary Larson; Zhi Hong; Jim Zhen Wu; Domenico Delia
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.261

View more
  5 in total

1.  The transcription factor Cux1 in cerebellar granule cell development and medulloblastoma pathogenesis.

Authors:  Sabine Topka; Alexander Glassmann; Gunnar Weisheit; Ulrich Schüller; Karl Schilling
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  E1B and E4 oncoproteins of adenovirus antagonize the effect of apoptosis inducing factor.

Authors:  Roberta L Turner; John C Wilkinson; David A Ornelles
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 3.  Trial Watch: Targeting ATM-CHK2 and ATR-CHK1 pathways for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Gwenola Manic; Florine Obrist; Antonella Sistigu; Ilio Vitale
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23

4.  Targeting MUS81 promotes the anticancer effect of WEE1 inhibitor and immune checkpoint blocking combination therapy via activating cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Chengguo Li; Qian Shen; Peng Zhang; Tao Wang; Weizhen Liu; Ruidong Li; Xianxiong Ma; Xiangyu Zeng; Yuping Yin; Kaixiong Tao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 5.  Rare Genetic Diseases with Defects in DNA Repair: Opportunities and Challenges in Orphan Drug Development for Targeted Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sonali Bhattacharjee; Saikat Nandi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.