Literature DB >> 22258276

Bacterial diversity in Cr(VI) and Cr(III)-contaminated industrial wastewaters.

Katerina Katsaveli1, Dimitris Vayenas, George Tsiamis, Kostas Bourtzis.   

Abstract

The bacterial community structure of a chromium water bath, a chromium drainage waste system, a chromium pretreatment tank, and a trivalent chromium precipitation tank from the Hellenic Aerospace Industry S.A. was assessed using 16S rRNA libraries and a high-density DNA microarray (PhyloChip). 16S rRNA libraries revealed a bacterial diversity consisting of 14 distinct operational taxonomic units belonging to five bacterial phyla: Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. However, employing a novel microarray-based approach (PhyloChip), a high bacterial diversity consisting of 30 different phyla was revealed, with representatives of 181 different families. This made it possible to identify a core set of genera present in all wastewater treatment stages examined, consisting of members of Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. In the chromium pretreatment tank, where the concentration of Cr(VI) is high (2.3 mg/l), we identified the presence of Pseudomonadales, Actinomycetales, and Enterobacteriales in abundance. In the chromium precipitation tank, where the concentration of Cr(III) is high, the dominant bacteria consortia were replaced by members of Rhodocyclales and Chloroflexi. The bacterial community structure changed significantly with changes in the chromium concentration. This in-depth analysis should prove useful for the design and development of improved bioremediation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258276     DOI: 10.1007/s00792-012-0429-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Extremophiles        ISSN: 1431-0651            Impact factor:   2.395


  56 in total

1.  Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Bret R Larget; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biological chromium(VI) reduction using a trickling filter.

Authors:  E Dermou; A Velissariou; D Xenos; D V Vayenas
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Environmental whole-genome amplification to access microbial populations in contaminated sediments.

Authors:  Carl B Abulencia; Denise L Wyborski; Joseph A Garcia; Mircea Podar; Wenqiong Chen; Sherman H Chang; Hwai W Chang; David Watson; Eoin L Brodie; Terry C Hazen; Martin Keller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.

Authors:  A Chao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Characterization of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation gene cluster in a phenanthrene-degrading Acidovorax strain.

Authors:  David R Singleton; Liza Guzmán Ramirez; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Ralstonia pickettii in environmental biotechnology: potential and applications.

Authors:  M P Ryan; J T Pembroke; C C Adley
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Chromium (VI) biotransformation by beta- and gamma-Proteobacteria from natural polluted environments: a combined biological and chemical treatment for industrial wastes.

Authors:  Luciana Garavaglia; Silvia B Cerdeira; Diana L Vullo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 8.  Interference of chromium with biological systems in yeasts and fungi: a review.

Authors:  Borut Poljsak; István Pócsi; Peter Raspor; Miklós Pesti
Journal:  J Basic Microbiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.281

9.  Essential residues in the chromate transporter ChrA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Selene Aguilera; Ma Esther Aguilar; Martha P Chávez; Joel E López-Meza; Mario Pedraza-Reyes; Jesús Campos-García; Carlos Cervantes
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  High-density universal 16S rRNA microarray analysis reveals broader diversity than typical clone library when sampling the environment.

Authors:  Todd Z DeSantis; Eoin L Brodie; Jordan P Moberg; Ingrid X Zubieta; Yvette M Piceno; Gary L Andersen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.192

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microbial Diversity of Chromium-Contaminated Soils and Characterization of Six Chromium-Removing Bacteria.

Authors:  Zhiguo He; Yuting Hu; Zhen Yin; Yuehua Hu; Hui Zhong
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Bacterial Community Structures in Freshwater Polar Environments of Svalbard.

Authors:  Spyridon Ntougias; Żaneta Polkowska; Sofia Nikolaki; Eva Dionyssopoulou; Panagiota Stathopoulou; Vangelis Doudoumis; Marek Ruman; Katarzyna Kozak; Jacek Namieśnik; George Tsiamis
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Plant-fed versus chemicals-fed rhizobacteria of Lucerne: Plant-only teabags culture media not only increase culturability of rhizobacteria but also recover a previously uncultured Lysobacter sp., Novosphingobium sp. and Pedobacter sp.

Authors:  Nabil A Hegazi; Mohamed S Sarhan; Mohamed Fayez; Sascha Patz; Brian R Murphy; Silke Ruppel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Remediation of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Biochar-Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron and the Consequences for Indigenous Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Jianwei Yang; Xiangpeng Tan; Muhammad Shaaban; Yajun Cai; Buyun Wang; Qi'an Peng
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 5.  Microbial diversity in the era of omic technologies.

Authors:  Sofia Nikolaki; George Tsiamis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Lab to Field Assessment of the Ecotoxicological Impact of Chlorpyrifos, Isoproturon, or Tebuconazole on the Diversity and Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community.

Authors:  Veronika Storck; Sofia Nikolaki; Chiara Perruchon; Camille Chabanis; Angela Sacchi; Giorgia Pertile; Céline Baguelin; Panagiotis A Karas; Aymé Spor; Marion Devers-Lamrani; Evangelia S Papadopoulou; Olivier Sibourg; Cedric Malandain; Marco Trevisan; Federico Ferrari; Dimitrios G Karpouzas; George Tsiamis; Fabrice Martin-Laurent
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.