Literature DB >> 22258225

An examination of opportunities for the active patient in improving patient safety.

Rachel E Davis1, Nick Sevdalis, Rosamond Jacklin, Charles A Vincent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients can make valuable contributions to their health care safety. Little is known, however, about the factors that could affect patient participation in safety-related aspects of their health care management. Examining and understanding how patient involvement in safety-related behaviors can be conceptualized will allow greater insight into why patients may be more willing to participate in some behaviors more than others may.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a new approach for understanding and conceptualizing patient involvement in safety with specific reference to a surgical patient cohort.
METHODS: The authors conducted a review of the key opportunities for patient involvement along the surgical care trajectory and examination and identification of the properties and characteristics of different safety-related behaviors and the barriers to patient involvement they entail.
RESULTS: Safety-related behaviors comprise 3 main properties including the type of error the behavior is trying to prevent (e.g., medication error), the action required by the patient (e.g., asking questions), and the characteristics of the action (e.g., whether the behavior involves interacting with a health care professional). Barriers to patient involvement that relate to patients and health care professionals can be broadly categorized as interpersonal, intrapersonal, and cultural.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that thinking of patient involvement in safety relating to properties and characteristics of the behavior together with the barriers to involvement could aid the design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions aimed at encouraging patient participation. It will also enable a greater understanding and assessment of not only what interventions may be effective (at encouraging patient involvement) but when they might be effective (i.e., what stage of the care pathway) and why.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258225     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31823cba94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  19 in total

1.  Parents' Perspectives on Navigating the Work of Speaking Up in the NICU.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Kirsten Wisner; Carrie Holschuh; Kelly M Fagan; Linda S Franck
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Parent-Reported Errors and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Children.

Authors:  Alisa Khan; Stephannie L Furtak; Patrice Melvin; Jayne E Rogers; Mark A Schuster; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Using the Health Belief Model to explain patient involvement in patient safety.

Authors:  Andrea C Bishop; G Ross Baker; Todd A Boyle; Neil J MacKinnon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Safety threats and opportunities to improve interfacility care transitions: insights from patients and family members.

Authors:  Lianne Jeffs; Simon Kitto; Jane Merkley; Renee F Lyons; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures.

Authors:  Gavin Daker-White; Rebecca Hays; Aneez Esmail; Brian Minor; Wendy Barlow; Benjamin Brown; Thomas Blakeman; Peter Bower
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Predictors of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards family involvement in safety-relevant behaviours: a cross-sectional factorial survey study.

Authors:  Rachel Davis; M Savvopoulou; R Shergill; S Shergill; D Schwappach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Tracy Hutchings; Jennifer Henderson; Heather Rimas; Yvonne Chen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Working for patient safety: a qualitative study of women's help-seeking during acute perinatal events.

Authors:  Nicola Mackintosh; Susanna Rance; Wendy Carter; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  What attributes of patients affect their involvement in safety? A key opinion leaders' perspective.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow; Rachel Davis; Kathleen Callaghan; Susan Dovey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  The patient is in: patient involvement strategies for diagnostic error mitigation.

Authors:  Kathryn M McDonald; Cindy L Bryce; Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.