Literature DB >> 22258112

Persistence at 1 year of oral antiosteoporotic drugs: a prospective study in a comprehensive health insurance database.

Cyrille B Confavreux1, Florence Canoui-Poitrine, Anne-Marie Schott, Véronique Ambrosi, Valérie Tainturier, Roland D Chapurlat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatments against osteoporosis have demonstrated fracture risk reduction but persistence to therapy remains a major issue. Intermittent regimens have been developed to improve persistence. The aim of this 1-year prospective study was to compare, in the general population, the persistence of various oral regimens of antiosteoporotic treatment.
METHODS: We conducted this prospective study in the French comprehensive public health insurance database of the Rhône-Alpes region. Women aged 45 years or older who had a first reimbursement of an oral antiosteoporotic treatment during February 2007 composed the study cohort. Persistence was defined by the proportion of patients refilling a prescription in the pharmacist delivery register (ERASME). Using statistical analyses like Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests, we compared the treatment persistence of strontium ranelate, raloxifene, and daily-, weekly-, and monthly bisphosphonates.
RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred and nineteen patients were included over a period of 1 month and followed up for 12 months. Two hundred and eighty-nine (11.9%) patients were treated with monthly bisphosphonates, 1298 (53.7%) with weekly bisphosphonates, and 832 (34.4%) with daily treatments (526 strontium ranelate (21.7%), 296 raloxifene (12.2%), and 10 bisphosphonates (0.4%)). At 1 year, overall persistence was 34%. Fifty percent of patients on monthly bisphosphonates were still persistent while only 37% of patients on weekly bisphosphonates, 34% on raloxifene, and 16% on strontium ranelate were persistent. Therapy monitoring with biochemical markers or bone mineral density was associated with improved persistence.
CONCLUSION: Overall persistence at 1 year was low, but intermittent regimens were associated with higher persistence rates, along with women who had therapy monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22258112     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-11-0959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  16 in total

1.  One and two-year persistence with different anti-osteoporosis medications: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  C Reyes; C Tebe; D Martinez-Laguna; M S Ali; A Soria-Castro; C Carbonell; D Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Anti-osteoporotic treatments in France: initiation, persistence and switches over 6 years of follow-up.

Authors:  M Belhassen; C B Confavreux; B Cortet; L Lamezec; M Ginoux; E Van Ganse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Patient preference for monthly bisphosphonate versus weekly bisphosphonate in a cluster-randomized, open-label, crossover trial: Minodroate Alendronate/Risedronate Trial in Osteoporosis (MARTO).

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Hiroya Okano; Takefumi Furuya; Tomohiko Urano; Masaichi Hasegawa; Hisashi Hirabayashi; Takami Kumakubo; Kazuya Makita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Comparative statistical analysis of osteoporosis treatment based on Hungarian claims data and interpretation of the results in respect to cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  P Lakatos; E Tóth; L Szekeres; G Poór; G Héjj; I Marton; I Takács
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Localization of Minodronate in Mouse Femora Through Isotope Microscopy.

Authors:  Hiromi Hongo; Muneteru Sasaki; Sachio Kobayashi; Tomoka Hasegawa; Tomomaya Yamamoto; Kanako Tsuboi; Erika Tsuchiya; Tomoya Nagai; Naznin Khadiza; Miki Abe; Ai Kudo; Kimimitsu Oda; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Minqi Li; Hisayoshi Yurimoto; Norio Amizuka
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Management of oral bisphosphonates treatment by rheumatologists and determinants of therapeutic changes: a case-vignette-based study.

Authors:  C Roux; G Baron; K Briot; B Roux; B Cortet; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Alendronate soluble solution: a higher adherence rate in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stefano Coaccioli; Giorgio Celi; Mariano Edoardo Crapa; Francesco Masia; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-05

9.  Compliance and persistence with daily, weekly, and monthly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in Japan: analysis of data from the CISA.

Authors:  Hideaki Kishimoto; Masayuki Maehara
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs after fracture.

Authors:  C Klop; P M J Welsing; P J M Elders; J A Overbeek; P C Souverein; A M Burden; H A W van Onzenoort; H G M Leufkens; J W J Bijlsma; F de Vries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.