Literature DB >> 22256789

Width and elevation of the palatal shelves in unoperated unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients in the permanent dentition.

Benny S Latief1, Kostas C Lekkas, Jan G J H Schols, Piotr S Fudalej, Mette A R Kuijpers.   

Abstract

Patients with cleft left lip and palate (CLP) normally require extensive surgery from an early age up to the end of adolescence. These surgeries affect the growth of the maxillofacial complex. The degree to which the cleft itself affects growth of the maxillofacial complex remains poorly understood. By analysing the width and elevation of the palatal shelves in unoperated adolescents and adults with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP and BCLP, respectively) and a non-cleft control group, it is possible to gain more insight into the real intrinsic growth potential of the maxillary structures. In this study, dental casts of the full permanent dentition of individuals with unrepaired UCLP (n = 68) and BCLP (n = 13) and non-cleft controls (n = 24) from the same area of Indonesia were digitized three-dimensionally. Maxillary arch width in the canine, premolar and molar regions, and the width and elevation of the palatal shelves were measured. Results showed that in patients with UCLP, the width of the palatal shelves on the cleft side in all regions, and on the non-cleft side in the canine/first premolar region, was significantly smaller compared with the control group. BCLP subjects showed similar deviations. In the UCLP group, the palatal shelves were rotated cranially and positioned more vertically. In the BCLP group, the palatal shelves were inclined by almost 10 ° more than the control group. The width of the palatal shelf and width of the maxillary arch positively correlated in the canine and first premolar regions for both the cleft and non-cleft side in patients with UCLP, and in the canine region for patients with BCLP. This means that the wider the palatal shelf, the wider the maxillary arch. The elevation of palatal shelves correlated with the maxillary arch width in all regions in patients with UCLP, and only in the premolar region in the control group. Thus, the wider the arch width, the smaller the elevation angle (the maxillary shelves are less vertical). No correlations between palatal shelf elevation and maxillary arch width were found in the BCLP group. This shows that the intrinsic growth potential in patients with UCLP and BCLP is affected by a smaller palatal shelf width and larger elevation of the shelves. These deviations may result in a wider cleft.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy © 2012 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22256789      PMCID: PMC3381620          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  24 in total

1.  Cephalometric measurements on adult patients with non-operated cleft palates.

Authors:  F ORTIZ-MONASTERIO; A S REBEIL; M VALDERRAMA; R CRUZ
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull       Date:  1959-07

2.  A comparative study on dental-arch morphology in adult unoperated and operated cleft palate patients.

Authors:  Bin Ye; Changhu Ruan; Jing Hu; Yunqiang Yang; Abhijit Ghosh; Sangeeta Jana; Guozhi Zhang
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Maxillary arch width in unoperated adult bilateral cleft lip and alveolus and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  B S Latief; C Lekkas; M A R Kuijpers
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Maxillary and mandibular dental-arch dimensions and occlusion in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients form 3 to 17 years of age.

Authors:  K L Heidbuchel; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1997-01

5.  Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.

Authors:  Richard M Hesby; Steven D Marshall; Deborah V Dawson; Karin A Southard; John S Casko; Robert G Franciscus; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Isolated influences of lip and palate surgery on facial growth: comparison of operated and unoperated male adults with UCLP.

Authors:  L Capelozza Filho; A D Normando; O G da Silva Filho
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1996-01

7.  A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age.

Authors:  M Mars; W J Houston
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1990-01

8.  Cephalometric comparisons of individuals from India and Mexico with unoperated cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  S E Bishara; J R Jakobsen; J C Krause; R Sosa-Martinez
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1986-04

9.  Facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  K L Heidbüchel; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; H P Freihofer
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1994-05

10.  Maxillary growth of adult patients with unoperated cleft: answers to the debates.

Authors:  Enrina Diah; Lun-Jou Lo; Chiung-Shing Huang; Gentur Sudjatmiko; Imam Susanto; Yu-Ray Chen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  1 in total

1.  Palatal growth changes in newborns with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate from birth until 12 months after early neonatal cheiloplasty using morphometric assessment.

Authors:  Lenka Kožejová Jaklová; Eva Hoffmannová; Ján Dupej; Jiří Borský; Michal Jurovčík; Miloš Černý; Jana Velemínská
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.