Literature DB >> 22256557

Towards improved organisational support for nurses working in research roles in the clinical setting: a mixed method investigation.

Claire M Rickard1, Ged Williams, Gillian Ray-Barruel, Lyn Armit, Chris John Perry, Haida Luke, Paula Duffy, Marianne Wallis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical research workforce within nursing is growing including those employed to lead studies, coordinate research and many hybrid roles. Several studies have reported high job satisfaction among research nurses. However, there have also been reports of limited options for career development and professional integration, likely reflecting typical informal, departmentally based management models. Institution-wide studies of issues related to research nurses are lacking, thus hampering the design and implementation of effective organisational frameworks to support and develop these positions. AIMS: To explore experiences of nurses employed in research positions regarding organisational structures and support for research career pathways, and determine what reforms would strengthen an effective research specialisation pathway.
METHODS: A mixed-methods, cross-sectional approach, using a 104-item survey and semistructured interviews of 11 staff in research roles at an acute care hospital in Queensland, Australia.
RESULTS: Research nurses lack organisational support in many job aspects that they deem important. A management model for the coordination of research nurses within a health district could maximise development of this field. Academic liaison and mentoring for nurses in research, and recognition for effort, are key areas for a management model to target.
CONCLUSION: Nurses in research roles need individual mentorship, collective support, and the professional recognition and status that researchers in other settings are afforded. A comprehensive research management model would provide structured organisational support for nurses in research, improve professional development opportunities, ensure efficient use of human resources, synergistic working partnerships, and further contribute to a culture of evidence-based healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22256557     DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Collegian        ISSN: 1322-7696            Impact factor:   2.573


  6 in total

1.  Resolving Rivalries and Realigning Goals: Challenges of Clinical and Research Multiteam Systems.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Torsten Reimer; Erin L Williams; Mary Gill; Laurin Loudat Priddy; Deidi Bergestuen; Joan H Schiller; Haskell Kirkpatrick; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Commentary: Promoting a gender-affirming environment in research: implications for research nurses.

Authors:  Gemma Williams
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Duality of practice in clinical research nursing.

Authors:  Gordon Hill; Mairghread Ellis; Lindesay Irvine
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  The Leadership Mentoring in Nursing Research Program for Postdoctoral Nurses: A Development Paper.

Authors:  Thóra B Hafsteinsdóttir; Lisette Schoonhoven; Jan Hamers; Marieke J Schuurmans
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.176

5.  Creating an interest in research and development as a means of reducing the gap between theory and practice in primary care: an interventional study based on strategic communication.

Authors:  Helena Morténius
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Factors affecting recruitment and retention of nurses who deliver clinical research: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Mary G Boulton; Sally Beer
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-06-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.