Literature DB >> 22256006

Computational study of subdural and epidural cortical stimulation of the motor cortex.

Donghyeon Kim1, Sung Chan Jun, Hyoung-Ihl Kim.   

Abstract

Cortical stimulation (CS) has gained wide attention for its use in augmenting neurological recovery in various conditions. Noninvasive cortical stimulations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are less invasive when delivering the electrical current to the patient's brain, but have several limitations. Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) using an implantable stimulation system consisting of epidurally or subdurally placed electrodes and pulse generators, provides cortical stimulation and concurrent rehabilitative training in a stable fashion without limiting a patient's activities. The effectiveness of these two types of DCS--epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) and subdural cortical stimulation (SCS)--has not been compared. In this work, a computer simulation study was conducted to predict the current density distributions (CDD) through cortical stimulations using subdurally or epidurally placed electrodes. The simulation study is based on the human motor cortex model with a three-dimensional finite element model (FEM). The change in CDD depending on the shape of the electrode (disc or ring) is discussed. The output current induced by SCS was about four times larger than that of ECS when voltage stimulations with the same magnitude were regulated. Thus, SCS showed substantially better penetration of the current into gray or white matter. Further, the ring electrode performed comparably or slightly inferior to the disc electrode in both cortical stimulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22256006     DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Anatomically Realistic Full-Head Model on Activation of Cortical Neurons in Subdural Cortical Stimulation-A Computational Study.

Authors:  Hyeon Seo; Donghyeon Kim; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Modelling of the Current Density Distributions during Cortical Electric Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Treatment.

Authors:  S Fiocchi; E Chiaramello; P Ravazzani; M Parazzini
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Investigating the Feasibility of Epicranial Cortical Stimulation Using Concentric-Ring Electrodes: A Novel Minimally Invasive Neuromodulation Method.

Authors:  Ahmad Khatoun; Boateng Asamoah; Myles Mc Laughlin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  White Matter Network Architecture Guides Direct Electrical Stimulation through Optimal State Transitions.

Authors:  Jennifer Stiso; Ankit N Khambhati; Tommaso Menara; Ari E Kahn; Joel M Stein; Sandihitsu R Das; Richard Gorniak; Joseph Tracy; Brian Litt; Kathryn A Davis; Fabio Pasqualetti; Timothy H Lucas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Computational study on subdural cortical stimulation - the influence of the head geometry, anisotropic conductivity, and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Donghyeon Kim; Hyeon Seo; Hyoung-Ihl Kim; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.