Literature DB >> 2225437

Late results with Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.

C W Akins1, D L Carroll, M J Buckley, W M Daggett, A D Hilgenberg, W G Austen.   

Abstract

From 1977 to 1984, 429 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 339 underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis. Early mortality for AVR was 4.6% (isolated AVR, 1.9%) and for MVR was 5.3% (isolated MVR, 4.1%). Follow-up was 99.3% complete at a mean of 5.9 years. Actuarial event-free rates at 10 years for AVR and MVR were, respectively, 1) for structural valve deterioration, 91.4 +/- 3.2% versus 75.1 +/- 4.0% (p less than 0.01); 2) for nonstructural dysfunction, 100% versus 97.8 +/- 1.6% (p = NS); 3) for thromboembolism, 90.6 +/- 2.3% versus 87.3 +/- 2.6% (p = NS); 4) for anticoagulant-related bleeding, 95.3 +/- 1.1% versus 88.6 +/- 2.4% (p = 0.05); 5) for endocarditis, 87.8 +/- 5.7% versus 90.6 +/- 2.4% (p = NS); 6) for reoperation, 91.0 +/- 2.5% versus 74.4 +/- 3.7% (p less than 0.01); 7) for valve-related mortality, 76.1 +/- 6.9% versus 71.4 +/- 5.2% (p = 0.01); 8) for permanent physical impairment, 85.0 +/- 3.0% versus 71.5 +/- 3.6% (p less than 0.01); and 9) for combined operative mortality, valve-related mortality, and reoperation, 68.7 +/- 6.4% versus 51.5 +/- 4.9% (p = 0.01). No structural valve dysfunction was observed in any AVR patient whose valve was inserted after age 70. Age at operation was the only factor that predicted structural valve deterioration (p less than 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2225437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  3 in total

1.  Valve-on-valve technique for replacement of degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valve without explantation.

Authors:  Hirofumi Midorikawa; Kouichi Satou; Tomohiro Ogawa; Shunichi Hoshino
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-02

2.  Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.

Authors:  J P A Puvimanasinghe; J J M Takkenberg; M B Edwards; M J C Eijkemans; E W Steyerberg; L A Van Herwerden; K M Taylor; G L Grunkemeier; J D F Habbema; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.

Authors:  H Oxenham; P Bloomfield; D J Wheatley; R J Lee; J Cunningham; R J Prescott; H C Miller
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.