OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine: 1) if the CHADS(2) score correlates with left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus on pre-cardioversion transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); and 2) what, if any, components of the CHADS(2) score are most important in predicting LA/LAA thrombus. BACKGROUND: It is unknown if CHADS(2) score, a marker of thromboembolic risk in NVAF, accurately predicts LA/LAA thrombus on pre-cardioversion TEE. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients undergoing precardioversion TEE for NVAF at a tertiary hospital. TEE reports were reviewed for presence of LA/LAA thrombus. Using medical records and an ICD-9 coding database, a CHADS(2) score was derived, and the association between CHADS(2) and thrombus was evaluated with Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square. The relation between the singular components of CHADS(2) and thrombus were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-Square. RESULTS: In 643 consecutive patients undergoing pre-cardioversion TEE, LA/LAA thrombus was identified in 46 (7.2 %). A strong association was present between CHADS(2)score and LA/LAA thrombus (p = 0.0005). No thrombi were identified in patients with CHADS(2) = 0. Among 46 patients with thrombus, all (100%) had CHF. Of the singular components, CHF was the only factor independently associated with thrombus (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In non-valvular atrial fibrillation, CHADS(2) is strongly associated with LA thrombus on TEE. Our findings suggest pre-cardioversion TEE may be unnecessary if the CHADS(2) score = 0. Of the components of the CHADS(2) score, CHF was the only independently associated risk factor which correlated with LA/LAA thrombus.
OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine: 1) if the CHADS(2) score correlates with left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus on pre-cardioversion transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); and 2) what, if any, components of the CHADS(2) score are most important in predicting LA/LAA thrombus. BACKGROUND: It is unknown if CHADS(2) score, a marker of thromboembolic risk in NVAF, accurately predicts LA/LAA thrombus on pre-cardioversion TEE. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients undergoing precardioversion TEE for NVAF at a tertiary hospital. TEE reports were reviewed for presence of LA/LAA thrombus. Using medical records and an ICD-9 coding database, a CHADS(2) score was derived, and the association between CHADS(2) and thrombus was evaluated with Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square. The relation between the singular components of CHADS(2) and thrombus were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-Square. RESULTS: In 643 consecutive patients undergoing pre-cardioversion TEE, LA/LAA thrombus was identified in 46 (7.2 %). A strong association was present between CHADS(2)score and LA/LAA thrombus (p = 0.0005). No thrombi were identified in patients with CHADS(2) = 0. Among 46 patients with thrombus, all (100%) had CHF. Of the singular components, CHF was the only factor independently associated with thrombus (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In non-valvular atrial fibrillation, CHADS(2) is strongly associated with LA thrombus on TEE. Our findings suggest pre-cardioversion TEE may be unnecessary if the CHADS(2) score = 0. Of the components of the CHADS(2) score, CHF was the only independently associated risk factor which correlated with LA/LAA thrombus.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation; CHADS2; left atrial appendage thrombus; transesophageal echocardiography
Authors: Daniel E Singer; Gregory W Albers; James E Dalen; Alan S Go; Jonathan L Halperin; Warren J Manning Journal: Chest Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Mohammed N Khan; Ali Usmani; Saira Noor; Samy Elayi; Chi Keong Ching; Luigi Di Biase; Dimpi Patel; J David Burkhardt; Jennifer Cummings; Robert Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2008-02-12
Authors: Omer Uz; Murat Atalay; Mehmet Doğan; Zafer Isilak; Murat Yalcin; Mehmet Uzun; Ejder Kardesoglu; Bekir Sitki Cebeci Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: J Huang; S L Wu; Y M Xue; H W Fei; Q W Lin; S Q Ren; H T Liao; X Z Zhan; X H Fang; L Xu Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 3.411