| Literature DB >> 22253763 |
Xin-Ju Xiao1, Ke-Wei Liu, Yu-Yun Zheng, Yu-Ting Zhang, Wen-Chieh Tsai, Yu-Yun Hsiao, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Li-Jun Chen, Zhong-Jian Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the past century, the global average temperature has increased by approximately 0.74°C and extreme weather events have become prevalent. Recent studies have shown that species have shifted from high-elevation areas to low ones because the rise in temperature has increased rainfall. These outcomes challenge the existing hypothesis about the responses of species to climate change. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22253763 PMCID: PMC3254617 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Growth condition and spatial structure of C. obcordata.
(A) Porphyritic wild populations. (B) An inflorescence. (C) A bee Apis cerana visits the flower (arrow). (D) A hoverfly Betasyrphus serarius visits the flower (arrow). (E) Fruited plant.
Figure 2The age pyramid of the C. obcordata population.
Static life table of the C. obcordata population.
| Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ln |
|
| 2010 | 1 | 20 | 909.09 | 363.64 | 400.00 | 727.27 | 4863.64 | 5.35 | 6.81 | 0.51 |
| 2009 | 2 | 12 | 545.45 | −90.91 | −166.67 | 590.91 | 4136.36 | 7.58 | 6.30 | −0.15 |
| 2008 | 3 | 14 | 636.36 | −363.64 | −571.43 | 818.18 | 3545.45 | 5.57 | 6.46 | −0.45 |
| 2007 | 4 | 22 | 1000.00 | 136.36 | 136.36 | 931.82 | 2727.27 | 2.73 | 6.91 | 0.15 |
| 2006 | 5 | 19 | 863.64 | 545.45 | 631.58 | 590.91 | 1795.45 | 2.08 | 6.76 | 1.00 |
| 2005 | 6 | 7 | 318.18 | −90.91 | −285.71 | 363.64 | 1204.55 | 3.79 | 5.76 | −0.25 |
| 2004 | 7 | 9 | 409.09 | 272.73 | 666.67 | 272.73 | 840.91 | 2.06 | 6.01 | 1.10 |
| 2003 | 8 | 3 | 136.36 | −45.45 | −333.33 | 159.09 | 568.18 | 4.17 | 4.92 | −0.29 |
| 2002 | 9 | 4 | 181.82 | 45.45 | 250.00 | 159.09 | 409.09 | 2.25 | 5.20 | 0.29 |
| 2001 | 10 | 3 | 136.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 136.36 | 250.00 | 1.83 | 4.92 | 0.00 |
| 2000 | 11 | 3 | 136.36 | 90.91 | 666.67 | 90.91 | 113.64 | 0.83 | 4.92 | 1.10 |
| 1999 | 12 | 1 | 45.45 | 45.45 | 1000.00 | 22.73 | 22.73 | 0.50 | 3.82 | 3.82 |
Figure 3Survival rate and mortality rate curves of the C. obcordata population.
Fecundity schedule of the C. obcordata population.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 0.909 | – | – | – |
| 2 | 0.545 | – | – | – |
| 3 | 0.636 | – | – | – |
| 4 | 1.000 | 0.282 | 0.282 | 1.128 |
| 5 | 0.864 | 0.282 | 0.244 | 1.218 |
| 6 | 0.318 | 0.282 | 0.090 | 0.538 |
| 7 | 0.409 | 0.282 | 0.115 | 0.808 |
| 8 | 0.136 | 0.282 | 0.038 | 0.308 |
| 9 | 0.182 | 0.282 | 0.051 | 0.461 |
| 10 | 0.136 | 0.282 | 0.038 | 0.385 |
| 11 | 0.136 | 0.282 | 0.038 | 0.423 |
| 12 | 0.045 | 0.282 | 0.013 | 0.154 |
Leslie matrix model of the C. obcordata population.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.179 | 0.174 | 0.212 | 0.165 | 0.282 | 0.242 | 0.188 | 0.071 | 0.000 |
| 0.813 | |||||||||||
| 1.385 | |||||||||||
| 1.139 | |||||||||||
| 0.634 | |||||||||||
| 0.615 | |||||||||||
| 0.750 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 0.583 | |||||||||||
| 1.000 | |||||||||||
| 0.857 | |||||||||||
| 0.667 | |||||||||||
| 0 | 0.250 | ||||||||||
| 0.000 |
Dynamic preestimates of population size and continuous descending model of the C. obcordata population.
| Age class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 20 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 22 | 19 | 16 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 117 | 101 | 84 | 71 | 62 | 50 | 41 | 36 | 31 | 28 | 24 | 17 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Figure 4Negative growth model curve of the C. obcordata population.