| Literature DB >> 22253142 |
Lawrence C McCandless1, Paul Gustafson, Adrian R Levy, Sylvia Richardson.
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed new innovation in Bayesian techniques to adjust for unmeasured confounding. A challenge with existing methods is that the user is often required to elicit prior distributions for high-dimensional parameters that model competing bias scenarios. This can render the methods unwieldy. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to adjust for unmeasured confounding that derives default priors for bias parameters for observational studies with binary covariates. The confounding effects of measured and unmeasured variables are treated as exchangeable within a Bayesian framework. We model the joint distribution of covariates by using a log-linear model with pairwise interaction terms. Hierarchical priors constrain the magnitude and direction of bias parameters. An appealing property of the method is that the conditional distribution of the unmeasured confounder follows a logistic model, giving a simple equivalence with previously proposed methods. We apply the method in a data example from pharmacoepidemiology and explore the impact of different priors for bias parameters on the analysis results.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22253142 DOI: 10.1002/sim.4453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373