Literature DB >> 22253052

Seven years of experience with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: advantages and limitations.

Hyun Hwan Sung1, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Han-Yong Choi, Hyun Moo Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes and adverse events for patients with prostate cancer after treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).
METHODS: Between February 2004 and August 2010, patients with prostate cancer who underwent HIFU treatment were reviewed about oncologic outcomes and complications. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 1.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate BCR- and disease progression-free survival according to risk stratification. Predictors for BCR and disease progression were identified using the Cox-proportional hazard method.
RESULTS: The overall BCR rate was 59.5%, and median time to BCR was 13.8 months. The 5-year BCR-free survival rates of the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 66.3, 40.2, and 21.0% (P = 0.001), respectively, and the 5-year disease progression-free survival rates were 73.5, 46.0, and 29.2%, respectively (P = 0.008). Multivariate analysis showed that risk stratification, PSA nadir, and time to PSA nadir were significant predictors of BCR and disease progression. In the first 3 months post-op, 11 patients (8.7%) had complications. There were no patients who required blood transfusions or who had wound problems, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, or bowel dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: HIFU treatment does not provide effective oncologic outcomes even in low risk patients with prostate cancer as well as in the intermediate or high risk groups. Therefore, patients selected to undergo HIFU treatment for prostate cancer must be very carefully chosen. On the other hand, HIFU treatment for prostate cancer had a very low rate of complications.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22253052     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  4 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: new treatments for localized tumours-what matters first?

Authors:  Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Inactivation of DNA-dependent protein kinase promotes heat-induced apoptosis independently of heat-shock protein induction in human cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Seisuke Okazawa; Yukihiro Furusawa; Ayako Kariya; Mariame Ali Hassan; Mie Arai; Ryuji Hayashi; Yoshiaki Tabuchi; Takashi Kondo; Kazuyuki Tobe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  High-intensity focused ultrasound as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wan Song; U Seok Jung; Yoon Seok Suh; Hyun Jun Jang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byung Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-02-14

4.  The primary treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue He; Ping Tan; Mingjing He; Liang Hu; Jianzhong Ai; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.