Bloom's syndrome DNA helicase (BLM), a member of the RecQ family, is a key player in homologous recombination (HR)-based error-free DNA repair processes. During HR, BLM exerts various biochemical activities including single-stranded (ss) DNA translocation, separation and annealing of complementary DNA strands, disruption of complex DNA structures (e.g. displacement loops) and contributes to quality control of HR via clearance of Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. We performed a quantitative mechanistic analysis of truncated BLM constructs that are shorter than the previously identified minimal functional module. Surprisingly, we found that a BLM construct comprising only the two conserved RecA domains and the Zn(2+)-binding domain (residues 642-1077) can efficiently perform all mentioned HR-related activities. The results demonstrate that the Zn(2+)-binding domain is necessary for functional interaction with DNA. We show that the extensions of this core, including the winged-helix domain and the strand separation hairpin identified therein in other RecQ-family helicases, are not required for mechanochemical activity per se and may instead play modulatory roles and mediate protein-protein interactions.
Bloom's syndrome DNA helicase (BLM), a member of the RecQ family, is a key player in homologous recombination (HR)-based error-free DNA repair processes. During HR, BLM exerts various biochemical activities including single-stranded (ss) DNA translocation, separation and annealing of complementary DNA strands, disruption of complex DNA structures (e.g. displacement loops) and contributes to quality control of HR via clearance of Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. We performed a quantitative mechanistic analysis of truncated BLM constructs that are shorter than the previously identified minimal functional module. Surprisingly, we found that a BLM construct comprising only the two conserved RecA domains and the Zn(2+)-binding domain (residues 642-1077) can efficiently perform all mentioned HR-related activities. The results demonstrate that the Zn(2+)-binding domain is necessary for functional interaction with DNA. We show that the extensions of this core, including the winged-helix domain and the strand separation hairpin identified therein in other RecQ-family helicases, are not required for mechanochemical activity per se and may instead play modulatory roles and mediate protein-protein interactions.
Most genomes are built up from stable, double-stranded (ds) forms of DNA or RNA. This arrangement necessitates enzymatic unwinding of the two strands to access and manipulate the encoded information. Helicases are ubiquitous NTPases capable of separating complementary strands of nucleic acids. Beside those playing roles in replication, multiple groups of DNA helicases have specialized functions in DNA repair (1). Members of the RecQ helicase family [part of superfamily (SF) 2] are essential in homologous recombination (HR)-based error-free DNA repair processes in all kingdoms of life. The human genome encodes five RecQ family helicases termed RecQ1, BLM, WRN, RecQ4 and RecQ5. Three of these paralogues are affected in genetic diseases: BLM in Bloom's syndrome, WRN in Werner's syndrome and RecQ4 (RTS) in Rothmund–Thomson syndrome. BLM plays genome-wide roles in HR-mediated repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), one of the most serious genetic disintegrities (2). In the early stages of HR, BLM assists the resection of the 5′-DNA end at DSB sites (3,4), and exerts quality control functions by disrupting human (h) Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments and/or promoting strand exchange (5,6) (Supplementary Figure S1). Once HR has passed through this stage, BLM performs numerous further activities, which drive HR towards the formation of non-crossover products (1). The ‘early’ and ‘late’ HR functions of BLM were recently demonstrated in vivo in mouse embryonic stem cells (7). The mechanochemical activities of BLM utilized in HR span from the ability to translocate along single-stranded (ss) DNA and unwind or anneal complementary DNA strands, to the disruption of displacement loops (D-loops) and nucleoprotein filaments, and dissolution of double Holliday junctions (DHJs).It is reasonable to surmise that the above complex activities require complex protein structure. Indeed, BLM is a multidomain protein consisting of seven distinct structural regions. BLM was shown to form oligomeric (hexa- or tetrameric) structures in the absence of DNA (8). The N-terminal part of BLM (BLM1–431) was shown to exist as hexa- and dodecamers (9), suggesting that the large N-terminal domain (amino acid residues 1–641) promotes oligomerization. Moreover, the N-terminal domain was shown to provide binding sites for numerous partner proteins (10–16). Deletion of this domain abolished BLM oligomerization, but it did not affect its enzymatic activities (17,18). Similarly, to other SF2 and SF1 helicases, BLM has two tandem (N- and C-core) RecA domains (amino acids 642–993), which form the ATP binding site, contribute to DNA binding and drive inchworm-like movement along DNA. The family-specific RecQ C-terminal region (RQC) comprises the Zn2+-binding domain (ZnBD, amino acids 994–1068) and the winged-helix domain (WH, amino acids 1069–1189), which play roles in proper folding and DNA and protein binding, respectively (18–22). The contribution of the ZnBD and WH domains to the binding of DNA substrates is suggested by the finding that an isolated RQC construct had similar affinities to fork, G4 and HJ substrates to those of full-length BLM (20). The helicase and RNase D C-terminal domain (HRDC, amino acids 1190–1290) has auxiliary DNA-binding roles (18). The C-terminal region (amino acids 1291–1417), which is probably unstructured, plays roles in protein–protein interactions and encompasses the nuclear localization signal (2).The RecA region of various SF1 and SF2 helicases harbours a β-hairpin motif that was identified as a key structural element promoting DNA strand separation. This pin (referred to as RecA-pin in this article) is located in the C-core RecA domain of helicases unwinding in the 3′–5′ direction [including PcrA (23), Rep (24), UvrD (25) and Hel308 (26)], whereas it can be found in the N-core domain of RecD2, a 5′–3′ helicase (27). All mentioned helicases harbour an aromatic residue at the tip of this pin, similarly to E. coli (Ec) RecQ (F221, PDB structure 1OYY) (28). Interestingly, neither BLM nor RecQ1 possess an aromatic side chain in the homologous position (29).Within the ZnBD of BLM, four conserved cysteine residues (C1036, C1055, C1063, C1066) and a salt bridge-forming side chain pair (R1038–D1064) have been shown to be essential for Zn2+-dependent correct folding and functioning of the enzyme (18,19,21). In line with characterized in vitro mutations affecting these residues, genetic variants of C1055 and D1064 have been identified as Bloom's syndrome-causing mutations (30). Another structural element of the ZnBD, a helical hairpin (referred to as ZnBD-pin), has been proposed to play a role in unwinding by leading the newly separated DNA strand to the RecA motor core of humanRecQ1 and WRN helicases (29,31).The WH domain of RecQ1 harbours a hairpin motif essential for DNA unwinding via the protrusion of an essential aromatic residue (Y564), as evidenced by mutational analysis and crystallography (PDB code 2WWY) (29,32). The crystal structure of the dsDNA-bound WH domain of WRN revealed the existence of a homologous β-hairpin with an aromatic residue at its tip (F1037; PDB code 3AAF) (31). This pin (referred to as WH-pin) displaces the terminal nucleotide unit of the DNA ligand, supporting its unwinding role also in WRN. Contrary, mutations within the corresponding region of EcRecQ did not affect DNA unwinding, indicating that the WH-pin may not be universally essential for RecQ-family helicase activity (29).A truncated version of EcRecQ (amino acids 1–524) lacking the HRDC domain unwound dsDNA as effectively as the wild-type protein (29). However, a similar construct used for crystallography (amino acids 1–516) (28) showed reduced ssDNA binding (33,34). A short splice form of DrosophilaRecQ5, which naturally lacks the HRDC domain, also had unwinding activity similar to a longer, HRDC-containing splice form (35). HumanRecQ1 also lacks the HRDC domain but possesses unwinding activity (36). A HRDC-deleted mutant (amino acids 1–1119) of Sgs1, the yeast homologue of BLM, was insoluble, while another construct containing the HRDC domain (amino acids 400–1268) was soluble and retained the activity profile of full-length Sgs1 (37). A plant RecQ helicase from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtRecQ3), naturally lacking the WH and HRDC domains, has recently been shown to be capable of annealing complementary DNA strands, unwinding nicked HJs, but unable to migrate intact HJs (38). Interestingly, another RecQ helicase from the same organism (AtRecQ1) consists of only the two RecA domains and the ZnBD (39), but its biochemical properties are unexplored. Taken together, the above findings suggest that the HRDC domain, while its presence is important for some functions, is not essential for the mechanochemical activity of RecQ helicases in general.Truncation of the C-terminal part of BLM's HRDC domain (construct comprising amino acids 213–1267) resulted in defects in strand annealing (17) as well as DHJ-binding and -dissolution activities (40), while the dsDNA unwinding activity remained unchanged (17,40). Another construct harbouring an intact HRDC domain and C-terminal region (amino acids 642–1417) retained DHJ dissolution activity, indicating the role of the HRDC domain in this process (40). A BLM construct comprising the regions homologous to EcRecQ (BLM amino acids 642–1290, referred to as BLM1290 in this article) retained the ATPase and DNA unwinding activities and DNA substrate specificity profile of the full-length enzyme (BLMFL) (18,41). However, the ability of BLM1290 to form higher-order protein–DNA complexes and catalyse DNA strand annealing was significantly reduced (17). In contrast to BLM1290, the strand annealing activity of a slightly longer construct (amino acids 642–1350) was similar to that of BLMFL (17). These findings suggested that the region between residues 1290 and 1350 is required for strand annealing. Further truncation of the entire HRDC domain (construct comprising amino acids 642–1108) resulted in defects in ssDNA binding in mobility shift experiments (18). This construct was also unable to bind to heparin column during protein preparation, again indicative of impaired DNA binding (18). In line with these data, a point mutation in the HRDC domain of BLM (S1209T) causes Bloom's syndrome (30). Moreover, another single substitution in the HRDC domain (K1270V) was shown to affect DHJ dissolution (40). Interestingly, RecQ1 and WRN possess Lys at this position, similarly to BLM, but cannot dissolve DHJ structures (40).To identify the structural elements that are essential for the various mechanochemical activities of BLM, in the present study we compared the mechanistic properties of the previously investigated BLMFL and BLM1290 constructs with those of new constructs that are shorter than previously characterized ones. These include BLM amino acids 642–1005 (referred to as BLM1005) comprising solely the two RecA-core domains, and BLM amino acids 642–1077 (BLM1077) consisting of the RecA cores and the ZnBD (Figure 1). Surprisingly, we found that BLM1077 retains all of the ATPase, ssDNA translocation and dsDNA unwinding activities, exhibiting highly similar mechanistic parameters to those of BLM1290. The results demonstrate that the RecA domains and the ZnBD comprise a minimal functional helicase core even in the absence of the WH domain that was proposed to be the strand-separating unit of other RecQ helicases (29,31,32). In addition, BLM1077 exhibits more pronounced strand annealing than BLM1290, which shows that previously implicated C-terminal regions are not essential for this activity. We also demonstrate that BLM1077 is capable of disrupting D-loop structures and it has an enhanced capability for nucleoprotein disassembly.
Figure 1.
Homology model-based representation of the BLM segment comprising the RecA, ZnBD and WH domains. Shown are homology-modelled structures of BLM in two different conformations, determined crystallographically for EcRecQ (1OYY, A) and human RecQ1 (2WWY, B). Protein segments present in BLM1005 (comprising the two RecA domains) are shown in blue, whereas the additional segment present in BLM1077 (including the ZnBD) is shown in yellow. The green segment (WH domain) is missing from both BLM1005 and BLM1077, but is present in BLM1290 and BLMFL. Pin-like elements implicated in DNA strand separation in various helicases are shown in red. The bound DNA present in the 2WWY-based model is shown in grey.
Homology model-based representation of the BLM segment comprising the RecA, ZnBD and WH domains. Shown are homology-modelled structures of BLM in two different conformations, determined crystallographically for EcRecQ (1OYY, A) and humanRecQ1 (2WWY, B). Protein segments present in BLM1005 (comprising the two RecA domains) are shown in blue, whereas the additional segment present in BLM1077 (including the ZnBD) is shown in yellow. The green segment (WH domain) is missing from both BLM1005 and BLM1077, but is present in BLM1290 and BLMFL. Pin-like elements implicated in DNA strand separation in various helicases are shown in red. The bound DNA present in the 2WWY-based model is shown in grey.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents
Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were from Sigma–Aldrich Co. ATP and adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate (AMPPNP) were from Roche Applied Science. Phosphate (Pi) standard solution was from Merck. m13mp18 ssDNA isolation was carried out as in (42). Oligonucleotides were from VBC-Biotech (Supplementary Table S1). Except where stated, DNA concentrations are expressed as those of oligo- or polynucleotide molecules (as opposed to those of constituent nucleotide units). All measurements were carried out at 25°C. Data analysis was performed using OriginLab 8.0 and KinTek SF-2004 software.
Cloning
The coding regions of BLM1005 and BLM1077 were amplified by PCR from the pTXB3/BLM642–1290 plasmid (41) and subcloned between the NcoI and SapI sites of pTXB3 (New England Biolabs). All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Protein purification
BLMFL was expressed as previously described (43) with some modifications as follows. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (JEL1 strain) containing pYES2/BLM-His6 were grown in selective media (containing 3% (v/v) glycerol and 2% (v/v) DL-lactate in the absence of sugar) at 30°C. After 24-h expression at 20°C, cells were frozen in liquid N2 in large bullets and quickly ground in a coffee grinder. The cell powder was then melted in a water bath. Subsequent steps were done as described in (43). The purified protein was frozen and stored in liquid N2 in 40 -µl droplets.BLM1290, BLM1077 and BLM1005 were expressed and purified as described previously for BLM1290 (41). Coumarin-labelled Pi-binding protein (MDCC-PBP) and hRad51 were prepared as described in refs (44) and (45), respectively.Escherichia colisingle-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) was expressed and purified as previously described in (46) with the following modifications. Escherichia coli B ER2566 strain was used to express SSB in 4-l 2YT medium. Triton X-100 (0.1%) was used in the Lysis buffer instead of deoxycholate. Expression was induced at OD600 = 0.3 with 1 mM IPTG and cell were shaken for 16 h at 18°C. Lysozyme treatment was carried out at 4°C for 1 h. After ammonium sulphate precipitation and dialysis against HP buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% (v/v) glycerol], SSB was loaded onto a HiTrap Heparin HP column and eluted with a linear NaCl gradient (50 mM–2 M) in HP buffer. After pooling fractions containing SSB, ammonium sulphate precipitation was repeated. Purified SSB was dialysed against Storage buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% (v/v) glycerol) and frozen in liquid N2 in small droplets.MDCC-SSB labelling and preparation were done by the method described for IDCC-SSB in (47), with the following modifications. MDCC (N-[2-(1-maleimidyl) ethyl]-7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carboxamide) (Invitrogen) was used instead of IDCC (N-[2-(iodoacetamido) ethyl]-7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carboxamide), and the labelling reaction was performed for 3 h under argon gas. The labelled protein was isolated by passing through a PD10 (GE Healthcare) gel filtration column, pre-equilibrated with a buffer containing 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT and 10% glycerol. Protein concentration was measured according to Bradford's method with bovine serum albumin as standard. MDCC content was measured by coumarin absorbance at 430 nm using ε430 = 46 800 M−1 cm−1. The labelled protein was stored in liquid nitrogen.
Steady-state kinetics
ATPase activities were measured using a pyruvate kinase/lactate dehydrogenase (PK/LDH) coupled assay (14 U/ml PK, 20 U/ml LDH, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM phosphoenol pyruvate, 200 µM NADH) in SF-50 buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT) containing 50 µg/ml BSA. NADH absorbance was followed at 340 nm in a Shimadzu UV-2101PC spectrophotometer, and ATPase activities were calculated from linear fits to NADH absorbance changes (ε340 = 6220 M−1 cm−1).
Transient kinetics
Single-round translocation experiments were carried out in a KinTek SF-2004 stopped-flow apparatus in the presence of heparin as protein trap, and nucleoprotein displacement experiments were carried out in a BioLogic SFM 300/400 stopped-flow apparatus. Post-mix concentrations are stated. Pi release measurements were performed in SF-50 buffer. Pi mop (150 µM 7-methylguanosine, 0.1 U/ml purine nucleoside phosphorylase) and 3 µM MDCC-PBP were present in all solutions. MDCC-PBP and MDCC-SSB fluorescence was excited at 436 nm, and emission was followed by using a 455-nm long path filter (Comar Optics). MDCC-PBP fluorescence calibration was carried out as described earlier (41). Heparin (Sigma H3393) was dissolved in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/ml and prior to measurements it was dialysed against sterile distilled water and then SF-50 buffer (in MWCO 3500 dialysis tubing; Serva 44183).
Electrophoretic assays
DNA substrates (3 nM, listed in Supplementary Table S1) were used in unwinding, annealing and D-loop disruption assays. Reaction volume was 10 µl in Buffer-H (30 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 10 µg/ml BSA, 20 mM creatine phosphate, 20 µg/ml creatine kinase) containing 2 mM ATP (absent in annealing assays) and 2.4 mM MgCl2. Samples were mixed on ice, and the reaction was started with the addition of helicase (0–1 µM) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of loading dye (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 60 mM EDTA, 60% glycerol, 0.075% Orange G) containing 0.83% SDS and 1.67 mg/ml proteinase K. Mixtures were incubated at 37°C for additional 3 min. Samples were then loaded on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels in TBE buffer (89 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 89 mM boric acid, 20 mM EDTA). Electrophoresis was carried out at 4°C. Fluorescently labelled DNA was detected using a Typhoon TRIO+ Variable Mode Imager (Amersham Biosciences).
Homology modelling
For sequence alignments and homology models comprising the RecA, ZnBD and WH domains of BLM, we used the BLM primary sequence with Universal Protein Resource accession code P54132, and the experimentally determined atomic structures of EcRecQ bound to ATPγS [PDB code 1OYY, similar to 1OYW (28)], humanRecQ1 complexed with DNA [2WWY, similar to 2V1X (29)], and the WH domain of humanWRN bound to DNA [3AAF (31)]. Structure-based sequence alignment (Supplementary Figure S2) of the templates and BLM was carried out using Staccato program, which uses structural alignment information to improve the quality of sequence alignments (48). The RecA-ZnBD and WH regions of BLM as well as 1OYY and 2WWY templates were separated during the alignment process, due to different relative conformations of these regions in 1OYY and 2WWY. Based on this alignment, we built BLM homology models in the two different available RecQ helicase conformations based on templates 1OYY and 2WWY, respectively. 3D atomic models comprising all non-hydrogen atoms were generated by the Modeller9.8 package (49) using refine.very slow option for simulated annealing. Heteroatoms (Zn, ATPγS, DNA) were included in model building. A bundle of 10 models from random generation of the starting structures was calculated in both cases. The models possessing the lowest DOPE score were chosen for further analysis. The qualities of the models were evaluated using Procheck (50). The percentage of residues found in the allowed regions of the Ramachandran diagram were 99.2 and 99.5% for 1OYY- and 2WWY-based models, respectively.
RESULTS
Construct design
We created homology models of BLM based on structure-based sequence alignments of the crystallographically determined atomic structures of the protein segments comprising the RecA, ZnBD and WH domains of EcRecQ (1OYY) (28) and humanRecQ1 (2WWY) (29) (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S2, pdb files provided in Supplementary Data). These structures represent two different conformations of this helicase segment in which the WH domain adopts different positions relative to the other domains. In the alignments, we also used the sequence and atomic structure of the WH domain of humanWRN (3AAF) (31). The 1OYY-based BLM structure was similar to an earlier model based on the same structure (19), with differences confined mainly to loop regions. Using the above models, we designed truncated BLM constructs to identify the minimal functional core of the enzyme. The BLM1005 construct consists solely of the two RecA domains, whereas BLM1077 contains the ZnBD in addition to the RecA domains (Figure 1). We compared the properties of these constructs to those of BLM1290 (comprising also the WH and HRDC domains) and BLMFL.
The ZnBD is essential for normal functioning of BLM
The preparation yield of BLM1005 was only ∼5% of that of BLM1290, because most of the expressed protein was insoluble. The basal (DNA-free) ATPase activity of the soluble fraction of BLM1005 was kbasal,1005 = 0.02 ± 0.01 s−1, well below that of BLM1290 and BLMFL [kbasal,1290 = 0.08 ± 0.01 s−1
kbasal,FL = 0.22 ± 0.08 s−1; cf. Ref. (41)]. More importantly, ssDNA activation of BLM1005 ATPase was not detectable, in contrast to all other examined constructs (see below). These results showed that the two RecA domains alone are insufficient for correct folding and functioning of BLM.The expression yield of BLM1077 was similar to that of BLM1290. In contrast to earlier results on the longer BLM642–1108 construct (18), BLM1077 bound to the heparin column similarly to BLM1290 and eluted at a similar NaCl concentration (300 mM), suggesting that its general DNA binding propensity was not altered significantly by the deletion of the WH and HRDC domains. Moreover, both its basal (kbasal,1077 = 0.27 ± 0.06 s−1) and DNA-activated ATPase activities suggested that BLM1077 folded properly and retained normal functioning characteristic of the longer constructs (Supplementary Figure S3). The steady-state KDNA values (DNA concentrations required for half-maximal ATPase activation) of BLM1077 were similar to those of BLMFL and BLM1290, again indicating similar DNA interaction properties of the constructs (Supplementary Figure S3).
BLM1077 shows unaffected ssDNA translocation processivity and mechanochemical coupling
To test the ssDNA translocation activity of BLM1077, we measured the dependence of its steady-state ATPase kcat on oligo-dT substrate length (Figure 2; lengths expressed in nucleotide units). Similarly to our earlier findings on BLM1290 (41), BLM1077 showed two characteristic features: the steady-state kcat values increased and showed saturation with increasing DNA length, whereas the KDNA values showed a drastic length dependence <10 nt [delineating the binding site size (b) of the helicase], and stagnated above this length. Analysis of the data confirmed that BLM1077 actively translocates along the ssDNA track, with slightly higher ATPase rates both during translocation (ktrans) and at the 5′-end (kend) than BLM1290 (Table 1) (41). Dissociation from the 5′-end (koff,end) was also accelerated compared to BLM1290, resulting in saturation of kcat values at shorter DNA lengths. The data also indicated that the step size (s) remained 1 nt/ATP. However, this parameter was less robust due to the relatively small difference between ktrans and kend and the high koff,end value.
Figure 2.
DNA length-dependent ATPase kinetics indicate active ssDNA translocation by BLM1077. Shown are steady-state ATPase kcat (filled square) and KDNA (open square, ssDNA concentration required for half-maximal activation) values of 20 nM BLM1077 in the presence of oligo-dT substrates of different length at 25°C. kcat values were fitted (solid line) with the equation described previously for BLM1290 (41). Determined mechanistic parameters are listed in Table 1. The break point in KDNA values indicated a binding site size (b) of ∼10 nt, which is detectably smaller than that previously described for BLM1290 (∼14 nt) (41). See Supplementary Figure S3 for comparison of ATPase profiles of BLM1077 with those of BLM1290 and BLMFL in the presence of DNA substrates of different structure. Error bars represent SEM in all figures.
Table 1.
Kinetic parameters of BLM1077 compared to those of BLM1290
Method of determination
BLM1077
BLM1290a
kbasal
Steady-state ATPase activity in the absence of DNA (s−1)
PK/LDH assay
0.27 ± 0.06
0.08 ± 0.01
ktrans
Steady-state ATPase activity during ssDNA translocation (s−1)
PK/LDH assay
40 ± 5
33 ± 2
MDCC-PBP
35 ± 1
27 ± 2
kend
Steady-state ATPase activity at 5′-end of ssDNA (s−1)
PK/LDH assay
24 ± 7
5.6 ± 0.5
koff,end
Dissociation from 5′-end of ssDNA (s−1)
PK/LDH assay
7 ± 3
2.7 ± 0.3
b
Binding site size (nt)
PK/LDH assay, MDCC-PBP
∼10
∼14
C
Coupling stoichiometry (ATP/nt)
MDCC-PBP
0.83 ± 0.11
0.87 ± 0.08
s
Step size during translocation (nt/ATP)
PK/LDH assay, MDCC-PBP
1.2 ± 0.2
1.1 ± 0.1
aRef. (41).
DNA length-dependent ATPase kinetics indicate active ssDNA translocation by BLM1077. Shown are steady-state ATPase kcat (filled square) and KDNA (open square, ssDNA concentration required for half-maximal activation) values of 20 nM BLM1077 in the presence of oligo-dT substrates of different length at 25°C. kcat values were fitted (solid line) with the equation described previously for BLM1290 (41). Determined mechanistic parameters are listed in Table 1. The break point in KDNA values indicated a binding site size (b) of ∼10 nt, which is detectably smaller than that previously described for BLM1290 (∼14 nt) (41). See Supplementary Figure S3 for comparison of ATPase profiles of BLM1077 with those of BLM1290 and BLMFL in the presence of DNA substrates of different structure. Error bars represent SEM in all figures.Kinetic parameters of BLM1077 compared to those of BLM1290aRef. (41).To determine the translocation processivity of BLM1077, we measured the kinetics of Pi production form ATP in single-round translocation conditions in the presence of oligo-dT substrates of different length (Figure 3). Heparin was used as a protein trap to achieve single-round conditions. Heparin turned out to be an efficient trap for BLM1077, because it blocked the rebinding of DNA to the dissociated helicase, while it did not significantly enhance its DNA-free ATPase activity (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S4). As we described earlier for BLM1290 (41), upon mixing BLM1077 plus oligo-dT substrate with ATP plus heparin, the experimental traces showed multiphasic profiles. A first pre-steady-state exponential burst (Supplementary Figure S4) was followed by two other distinct phases corresponding to ATPase cycling during translocation along DNA and in the dissociated (trap-bound) state of the enzyme, respectively. The existence of a pre-steady-state exponential burst corresponding to a single ATP turnover by BLM1077 [identical to that by BLM1290 (41)] suggested that the rate-limiting step in the ATPase cycle during translocation was not changed by the truncation. The ATPase rate during the translocation-based phase was in good agreement with that determined using the PK/LDH-coupled ATPase assay (Figures 2 and 3; Supplementary Figure S4 and Table 1). The DNA length dependence of the amplitude of Pi production during translocation can be utilized to determine the mechanochemical coupling stoichiometry (C, ATP consumed/nt translocated) and processivity (P) of DNA-based motor proteins (41,51,52). Applying our previously published model (51) to the data sets showed that the coupling stoichiometry, C = 0.83 ± 0.11 ATP/nt, was practically identical to that determined earlier for BLM1290 (Figure 3B and Table 1) (41). This value reflects that the mean step size of ∼1 nt/ATP was not altered by the truncation. The processivity values of BLM1077 at the applied heparin concentrations (P = 0.956 and 0.951 at 6 and 8 mg/ml heparin, respectively; indicating a mean of 22 and 19 cycles taken in a single run) suggested that BLM1077 translocates slightly more processively along ssDNA than that reported for BLM1290 in similar conditions (41). To directly compare the processivities of BLM1077 and BLM1290, we performed single-round translocation experiments with both constructs in the presence of circular m13 phage ssDNA and 8 mg/ml heparin (Figure 3C). These experiments resulted in similar processivities for the two constructs, with a mean of 21 and 24 steps in a single run performed by BLM1077 and BLM1290, respectively.
Figure 3.
BLM1077 and BLM1290 translocate along ssDNA with similar mechanochemical coupling and processivity. (A) Transient kinetics of Pi liberation from ATP by BLM1077 during single-round ssDNA translocation. BLM1077 (0.1 µM) plus oligo-dT [1 µM, lengths (bottom to top) were 12, 15, 18, 23, 30, 45, 63 and 72 nt] was mixed with 0.5 mM ATP plus 8 mg/ml heparin (used as a protein trap) in the stopped-flow apparatus. Pi release was monitored using MDCC-PBP fluorescence (3 µM in all syringes). Fluorescence changes were converted to Pi concentration by using calibration curves. As previously described for BLM1290 (41,51), traces at oligo-dT lengths >12 nt consisted of an exponential burst with an amplitude of 1 mol Pi/mol BLM1077 (Supplementary Figure S4A), and two additional phases reflecting ATP hydrolysis during ssDNA translocation and in the trap-bound state, respectively. (B) Oligo-dT length dependence of the amplitudes of Pi production during the translocation phase. Data were fitted using the equation described for BLM1290 (41). The fit yielded translocation parameters for BLM1077 similar to those of BLM1290 (Table 1). (C) Transient kinetics of Pi liberation upon mixing 0.05 µM BLM1077 (black line) or BLM1290 (grey line) plus 90 µM (nt concentration) m13mp18 phage circular ssDNA with 0.5 mM ATP plus 8 mg/ml heparin in the stopped-flow apparatus. The amplitudes of Pi production during the translocation phase indicated similar mean run lengths (‹m›) and processivities (P) for the two constructs at the applied heparin concentration (‹m›
BLM1077 = 21 nt, PBLM1077 = 0.955; ‹m›
BLM1290 = 24 nt, PBLM1290 = 0.961).
BLM1077 and BLM1290 translocate along ssDNA with similar mechanochemical coupling and processivity. (A) Transient kinetics of Pi liberation from ATP by BLM1077 during single-round ssDNA translocation. BLM1077 (0.1 µM) plus oligo-dT [1 µM, lengths (bottom to top) were 12, 15, 18, 23, 30, 45, 63 and 72 nt] was mixed with 0.5 mM ATP plus 8 mg/ml heparin (used as a protein trap) in the stopped-flow apparatus. Pi release was monitored using MDCC-PBP fluorescence (3 µM in all syringes). Fluorescence changes were converted to Pi concentration by using calibration curves. As previously described for BLM1290 (41,51), traces at oligo-dT lengths >12 nt consisted of an exponential burst with an amplitude of 1 mol Pi/mol BLM1077 (Supplementary Figure S4A), and two additional phases reflecting ATP hydrolysis during ssDNA translocation and in the trap-bound state, respectively. (B) Oligo-dT length dependence of the amplitudes of Pi production during the translocation phase. Data were fitted using the equation described for BLM1290 (41). The fit yielded translocation parameters for BLM1077 similar to those of BLM1290 (Table 1). (C) Transient kinetics of Pi liberation upon mixing 0.05 µM BLM1077 (black line) or BLM1290 (grey line) plus 90 µM (nt concentration) m13mp18 phage circular ssDNA with 0.5 mM ATP plus 8 mg/ml heparin in the stopped-flow apparatus. The amplitudes of Pi production during the translocation phase indicated similar mean run lengths (‹m›) and processivities (P) for the two constructs at the applied heparin concentration (‹m›
BLM1077 = 21 nt, PBLM1077 = 0.955; ‹m›
BLM1290 = 24 nt, PBLM1290 = 0.961).
The WH domain harbouring the WH-pin is not necessary for DNA strand separation by BLM
The above experiments with BLM1077 demonstrated that the truncation of the N-terminal, WH, HRDC and C-terminal domains did not markedly affect the ATPase and ssDNA translocation properties of BLM. Next, we tested the DNA strand separation activity of BLM1077 on a splayed-arm DNA substrate (Figure 4A and B). Despite the fact that the WH domain [harbouring the WH-pin implicated in strand separation by RecQ1 (29,32) and WRN (31)] is entirely missing from BLM1077, surprisingly we found the unwinding profile of BLM1077 to be similar or even slightly enhanced compared to that of BLM1290 (Figure 4A and B). These data demonstrate that the WH domain is not necessary for dsDNA strand separation by BLM.
Figure 4.
BLM1077 performs effective dsDNA unwinding and detectable strand annealing. (A) DNA unwinding reactions using fluorescein-labelled (asterisks) splayed-arm DNA substrate containing 33 bp of dsDNA and 21–21 nt ssDNA regions. BLM1077 and BLM1290 were incubated with the DNA substrate at different concentrations (0–1 µM) in the presence of 2 mM ATP for 15 min at 37°C. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. (B) Dependence of the extent of unwinding (%) on BLM1077 (filled square) and BLM1290 (○) concentration. Data were corrected for the fraction of ssDNA in the absence of protein. (C–F) Strand annealing reactions using unlabelled and fluorescein-labelled (asterisks) ssDNA substrates in the absence of nucleotides (‘–Nu’, C and D) and in the presence of 2 mM AMPPNP (E and F). BLM1077 (filled square) and BLM1290 (○) (0–1 µM) were incubated with the two ssDNA strands capable of forming a splayed-arm structure (identical to those in panel A) for 15 min at 37°C. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. Data were corrected for the fraction of dsDNA in the absence of protein.
BLM1077 performs effective dsDNA unwinding and detectable strand annealing. (A) DNA unwinding reactions using fluorescein-labelled (asterisks) splayed-arm DNA substrate containing 33 bp of dsDNA and 21–21 nt ssDNA regions. BLM1077 and BLM1290 were incubated with the DNA substrate at different concentrations (0–1 µM) in the presence of 2 mM ATP for 15 min at 37°C. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. (B) Dependence of the extent of unwinding (%) on BLM1077 (filled square) and BLM1290 (○) concentration. Data were corrected for the fraction of ssDNA in the absence of protein. (C–F) Strand annealing reactions using unlabelled and fluorescein-labelled (asterisks) ssDNA substrates in the absence of nucleotides (‘–Nu’, C and D) and in the presence of 2 mM AMPPNP (E and F). BLM1077 (filled square) and BLM1290 (○) (0–1 µM) were incubated with the two ssDNA strands capable of forming a splayed-arm structure (identical to those in panel A) for 15 min at 37°C. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. Data were corrected for the fraction of dsDNA in the absence of protein.
BLM1077 is capable of annealing complementary DNA strands and disrupting D-loop structures
Synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) is one of the major routes of HR-based DNA repair in which BLM plays essential roles (Supplementary Figure S1) (1,53). In this pathway, disruption of D-loops is followed by re-annealing of the extended invading strand to the other 5′-resected end of the original DSB. To test whether these activities are retained in BLM1077, we performed strand annealing (Figure 4C–F) and D-loop disruption assays (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
BLM1077 disrupts D-loop structures. Unwinding reactions using Cy3-labelled (asterisks) D-loop DNA substrates with a 41-nt 3′-invading strand producing 21 bp of dsDNA region and a 20-nt 5′-ssDNA tail (3-INV, A), or a 41-nt 3′-invading strand with a 20-nt complementary strand annealed to the 5′-ssDNA-tail (DL, B) (schematic representations of structures are shown). The DL sample contained 24% of 3-INV substrate (lower band, indicated), which could not be separated by chromatography. Different concentrations (0–1 µM) of BLM1077 were incubated with the DNA substrates for 15 min at 37°C in the presence of 2 mM ATP. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. (C) Dependence of the extent of unwinding of the labelled strand (%) on BLM1077 concentration. 3-INV disruption (filled square) showed similar BLM1077 concentration dependence to that of DL substrate (open circle). The grey plot indicates the presence of 3-INV fraction in the DL sample.
BLM1077 disrupts D-loop structures. Unwinding reactions using Cy3-labelled (asterisks) D-loop DNA substrates with a 41-nt 3′-invading strand producing 21 bp of dsDNA region and a 20-nt 5′-ssDNA tail (3-INV, A), or a 41-nt 3′-invading strand with a 20-nt complementary strand annealed to the 5′-ssDNA-tail (DL, B) (schematic representations of structures are shown). The DL sample contained 24% of 3-INV substrate (lower band, indicated), which could not be separated by chromatography. Different concentrations (0–1 µM) of BLM1077 were incubated with the DNA substrates for 15 min at 37°C in the presence of 2 mM ATP. Samples were then deproteinised and run on 12% acrylamide gel. (C) Dependence of the extent of unwinding of the labelled strand (%) on BLM1077 concentration. 3-INV disruption (filled square) showed similar BLM1077 concentration dependence to that of DL substrate (open circle). The grey plot indicates the presence of 3-INV fraction in the DL sample.We found that, at high protein concentrations, BLM1077 induced annealing of complementary strands, both in the absence of nucleotides and in the presence of AMPPNP (a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue), with slightly higher efficiency than BLM1290 (Figure 4C–F). We also performed D-loop disruption experiments in the presence of two different D-loop structures (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S1). One substrate (3-INV) contained a 3′-invading strand with a 5′ ssDNA tail, while in the other substrate (DL) a complementary strand was annealed to the 5′ tail to rule out the possibility of D-loop unwinding based on ssDNA translocation starting from the 5′ tail. As expected based on the unaltered splayed-arm DNA unwinding activity of BLM1077 (Figure 4A and B), 3-INV was efficiently disrupted by this construct even at low protein concentrations (Figure 5A and C). Moreover, the DL substrate was disrupted by BLM1077 with the same efficiency as 3-INV (Figure 5B).
BLM1077 can effectively clear nucleoprotein filaments
The above results demonstrated that BLM1077 retains a range of DNA-based activities utilized in HR processes. We further tested the ability of BLM1077 to perform nucleoprotein filament displacement, an activity involving protein–protein interactions.We measured the effect of hRad51 on the ssDNA-activated ATPase activity of BLMFL, BLM1290 and BLM1077 (Figure 6A). The hRad51 concentrations required for half-maximal inhibition of the ssDNA-activated BLMATPase were close to those expected from the stoichiometry of hRad51 binding to ssDNA [3 nt/hRad51 monomer (45)]. Interestingly, the ATPase values at saturating hRad51 concentrations remained ∼20 times higher than the basal ATPase activities of each BLM construct (Figure 6A and C).
Figure 6.
Nucleoprotein filament clearance by BLM constructs. (A) Steady-state ATPase activities of 20 nM BLM1077 (filled squqre), BLM1290 (open circle) and BLMFL (open triangle) measured at 25°C in the presence of 100 nM dT54 and at different hRad51 concentrations. Hill-equation () was used for data fitting in which k0 and kINH are BLM ATPase activities in the absence of hRad51 and in the presence of saturating hRad51 concentration, respectively; cINH is hRad51 concentration; K is the Michaelis constant and n is the cooperativity factor. Obtained values of K and n (not shown) were similar for all three constructs. (B) Steady-state BLM ATPase activities measured as in (A) except using SSB instead of hRad51. SSB tetramer concentrations are indicated. (C) Steady-state ATPase activities of BLM constructs in the absence of DNA (kbasal, black) and in the presence of saturating concentrations of hRad51 and SSB (kINH,hRad51, grey and kINH,SSB, light grey, respectively, cf. panels A and B). Note that kINH,hRad51 was markedly elevated compared to kbasal in all three BLM constructs, indicating hRad51 filament clearance activity. Conversely, kINH,SSB was practically identical to kbasal in BLMFL and BLM1290, but markedly elevated in BLM1077, indicating that only the latter construct is able to clear SSB from ssDNA. (D) Kinetics of hRad51 nucleoprotein filament clearance by BLM constructs, as monitored by MDCC-SSB fluorescence. dT54 (150 nM) was incubated with 2.8 µM hRad51 for 30 min on ice. BLM constructs were then added at a concentration of 200 nM, and samples were incubated for additional 10 min on ice. Traces labelled BLM1077 (black), BLM1290 (grey) and BLMFL (light grey) were recorded upon rapidly mixing dT54.hRad51.BLM premixtures with 1 µM MDDC-SSB (marked as SSB*) plus 2 mM ATP to monitor hRad51 clearance by BLM. The panel also shows control traces recorded upon mixing MDCC-SSB with buffer alone, MDCC-SSB with free dT54 (in the absence of hRad51 and BLM), and dT54.Rad51.BLM premixtures with MDCC-SSB in the absence of ATP. (In the latter case, traces were very similar in the case of all BLM constructs and also when BLM was omitted.) Traces were corrected for MDCC-SSB fluorescence levels at the start of the reactions. The extent of active hRad51 clearance by BLM, as calculated from the final steady-state MDCC-SSB fluorescence levels, was 41, 41 and 39% in the case of BLM1077, BLM1290 and BLMFL, respectively.
Nucleoprotein filament clearance by BLM constructs. (A) Steady-state ATPase activities of 20 nM BLM1077 (filled squqre), BLM1290 (open circle) and BLMFL (open triangle) measured at 25°C in the presence of 100 nM dT54 and at different hRad51 concentrations. Hill-equation () was used for data fitting in which k0 and kINH are BLMATPase activities in the absence of hRad51 and in the presence of saturating hRad51 concentration, respectively; cINH is hRad51 concentration; K is the Michaelis constant and n is the cooperativity factor. Obtained values of K and n (not shown) were similar for all three constructs. (B) Steady-state BLMATPase activities measured as in (A) except using SSB instead of hRad51. SSB tetramer concentrations are indicated. (C) Steady-state ATPase activities of BLM constructs in the absence of DNA (kbasal, black) and in the presence of saturating concentrations of hRad51 and SSB (kINH,hRad51, grey and kINH,SSB, light grey, respectively, cf. panels A and B). Note that kINH,hRad51 was markedly elevated compared to kbasal in all three BLM constructs, indicating hRad51 filament clearance activity. Conversely, kINH,SSB was practically identical to kbasal in BLMFL and BLM1290, but markedly elevated in BLM1077, indicating that only the latter construct is able to clear SSB from ssDNA. (D) Kinetics of hRad51 nucleoprotein filament clearance by BLM constructs, as monitored by MDCC-SSB fluorescence. dT54 (150 nM) was incubated with 2.8 µM hRad51 for 30 min on ice. BLM constructs were then added at a concentration of 200 nM, and samples were incubated for additional 10 min on ice. Traces labelled BLM1077 (black), BLM1290 (grey) and BLMFL (light grey) were recorded upon rapidly mixing dT54.hRad51.BLM premixtures with 1 µM MDDC-SSB (marked as SSB*) plus 2 mM ATP to monitor hRad51 clearance by BLM. The panel also shows control traces recorded upon mixing MDCC-SSB with buffer alone, MDCC-SSB with free dT54 (in the absence of hRad51 and BLM), and dT54.Rad51.BLM premixtures with MDCC-SSB in the absence of ATP. (In the latter case, traces were very similar in the case of all BLM constructs and also when BLM was omitted.) Traces were corrected for MDCC-SSB fluorescence levels at the start of the reactions. The extent of active hRad51 clearance by BLM, as calculated from the final steady-state MDCC-SSB fluorescence levels, was 41, 41 and 39% in the case of BLM1077, BLM1290 and BLMFL, respectively.We also performed the ATPase inhibition experiments using E. coliSSB instead of hRad51 (Figure 6B). Similarly, to hRad51, the presence of SSB markedly decreased the ssDNA-activated ATPase activities of all three BLM constructs. However, hRad51- and SSB-inhibition significantly differed in that SSB decreased the ATPase activity of BLMFL and BLM1290 to their basal level, while that of BLM1077 remained markedly higher and practically identical to that measured in the presence of hRad51 (Figure 6B and C). This finding indicates that all three BLM constructs are able to clear hRad51 filaments and, surprisingly, BLM1077 is also able to remove SSB from ssDNA.Importantly, the ATPase activities reported in Figure 6A–C were calculated using the concentration of BLM molecules. However, the processes of hRad51 filament turnover and BLM-induced hRad51 clearance are also associated with ATP consumption by hRad51. The ATP turnover rate constant of ssDNA-bound hRad51 was reported to be ∼0.001 s−1 in the absence of clearance effectors [(54), in line with our measurements]. This low activity is unlikely to significantly contribute to the observed ATP consumption rates at the applied BLM and Rad51.ssDNA concentrations. On the other hand, hRad51 clearance by BLM is likely brought about by BLM-induced enhancement of hRad51ATPase activity, as recently described for yeastRad51 and the Srs2 translocase (55). The ATPase rate constants reported in Figure 6A and C should therefore be viewed as those resulting from the combined action of BLM-catalysed ATP hydrolysis that drives the translocation of the helicase along ssDNA, and BLM-facilitated ATP hydrolysis by hRad51 monomers being cleared from ssDNA.To test hRad51 nucleoprotein filament clearance more directly, we monitored this activity in stopped-flow experiments using fluorescently labelled SSB [MDCC-SSB, (47)]. When ssDNA.hRad51 or ssDNA.hRad51.BLM premixtures were rapidly mixed with MDCC-SSB in the stopped-flow apparatus, initial rapid phases of MDCC-SSB fluorescence increase were observed both in the presence and absence of ATP in the reaction (Figure 6D). These phases were therefore attributed to MDCC-SSB binding to the hRad51-free fraction of dT54. In the presence of BLM constructs and ATP, a slower large increase in MDCC-SSB fluorescence was observed, reporting active hRad51 clearance from ssDNA by BLM. The kinetics and amplitude of this phase was very similar in the case of BLM1077, BLM1290 and BLMFL, indicating that all three BLM constructs are capable of hRad51 filament clearance with similar efficiencies (Figure 6D).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we identified a minimal functional core region of the humanBLMhelicase, which is significantly shorter than previously investigated constructs showing impaired functionality (17,18,40). Our results show that the BLM core consisting of solely the two RecA domains and the ZnBD (BLM1077 construct) is capable of performing a multitude of mechanochemical activities utilized in DNA repair (Supplementary Figure S1) including ssDNA translocation, dsDNA unwinding, D-loop disruption and hRad51 nucleoprotein displacement. These findings demonstrate that the additional domains acquired by BLM during evolution are not required for vigorous motor activity per se, but play regulatory roles that may enhance the specificity and efficiency of more complex DNA-restructuring activities. For instance, in addition to its DNA binding function, the WH domain has been shown to mediate protein–protein interactions in various DNA-binding proteins. In Fok1 restriction endonuclease and in the 32 kDa subunit of humanreplication protein A (RPA), the WH domain makes little or no contact with DNA, but plays roles in protein–protein interactions (56,57). Similarly, the interaction of BLM with the FEN-1 nuclease, which is important for DNA end resection during early HR, is mediated by the RQC region of BLM (22). Available evidence suggests that, although the overall structure of the WH domain has been conserved during evolution, it has acquired versatile functions in different proteins.The mechanistic parameters of BLM1077 translocation along ssDNA are highly similar to those of BLM1290 and BLMFL (Figures 2 and 3; Supplementary Figures S3 and S4; Table 1), demonstrating that BLM1077 is a bona fide processive ssDNA translocase, unlike some DEAD-box RNA helicases that can unwind short stretches of dsRNA solely by kinking the RNA using the energy gained from the interaction with a single ATP molecule (58). Thus, the domains absent from BLM1077 do not play significant roles in ssDNA translocation.In line with earlier studies on BLM constructs harbouring point mutations in the ZnBD (18,19,21), our results showed that the truncation of this domain impairs the folding and functioning of BLM. On the other hand, the vigorous activities of BLM1077 show that the presence of the WH domain, and the WH-pin located therein, is not required for efficient dsDNA unwinding by BLM. This property is in stark contrast to humanRecQ1 in which the WH-pin was found essential for unwinding (29). Interestingly, BLM does not appear to harbour a characteristic pin-like structural element with an aromatic top residue in the C-core RecA domain, which could act similarly to the RecA-pin of various other helicases (Figure 1). Thus, it remains to be determined whether the BLM structural element located in this position (a charged loop (866PKKPKKV872) with a proline at its tip, Figure 1) can act as a DNA strand-separating pin.BLM1290 was earlier shown to possess reduced DNA strand annealing capability (17), indicating that the region C-terminal from the HRDC domain is an important determinant of this property. Using higher protein concentrations, we found that BLM1290 was able to anneal complementary dsDNA strands, but this property was more pronounced in BLM1077 (Figure 4), indicating that the C-terminal region is not essential for this feature.Besides the basic mechanochemical activities mentioned earlier, we also found that BLM1077 effectively unwinds D-loop structures, and the unwinding efficiency was unaffected by the presence of an 5′-ssDNA tail (Figure 5). This finding demonstrates that the core domain of BLM retains the ability to recognise and disrupt complex DNA structures encountered during HR. In complex with topoisomerase IIIα and BLAP75/RMI1, BLMFL is also able to perform convergent branch migration to dissolve double Holliday junctions. Earlier truncation studies showed that the C-terminal regions missing from BLM1077 are essential for the dissolution activity (40), which thus appears to be the only major molecular function that cannot be performed by the minimal motor core of BLM.One of the most important roles of BLM during HR is quality control, which is brought about by its capability to disrupt hRad51 nucleoprotein filaments (Supplementary Figure S1) (6). This activity is indispensable to avoid illegitimate HR events in mitotic cells, which could otherwise lead to chromosome rearrangements and cancerous processes. Consequently, a characteristic feature of Bloom's syndromepatients and cell lines is the elevated frequency of sister chromatid exchange events (59). Nucleoprotein filament disassembly is based on ssDNA translocation and acceleration of hRad51 dissociation from ssDNA by BLM (6). Based on results on yeastRad51 and Srs2helicase (55), it appears likely that BLM accelerates the ATPase activity of hRad51, which leads to the weakening of the hRad51-DNA interaction and, in turn, the dissociation of hRad51 from ssDNA. We found that BLM1077 is capable of clearing hRad51 nucleoprotein filaments with the same efficiency as BLM1290 and BLMFL (Figure 6A, C and D). Surprisingly, the ATPase profiles of BLM1077 in the presence of bacterial SSB filaments indicated that this construct is even able to dismantle SSB from ssDNA, unlike the longer BLM constructs (Figure 6B). This result suggests that the RecA-ZnBD core of BLM is a vigorous ssDNA translocase, and the additional domains may not only confer more complex functions but may also negatively regulate mechanochemical activities.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online: Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1–4 and pdb files of BLM homology models (BLM_1OYY.pdb and BLM_2WWY.pdb).
FUNDING
Norway Grants (NNF2-85613 to M.K.); Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (K71915 and NK81950 to M.K.); TÁMOP Grant (4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0003 to M.K.); Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0072/2010 to M.K.) and ‘Momentum’ Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2011-006/2011 to M.K.). M.K. is a Bolyai Fellow of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Funding for open access charge: Momentum’ Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2011-006/2011 to M.K.).Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Authors: Mark S Dillingham; Katherine L Tibbles; Jackie L Hunter; Jason C Bell; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Martin R Webb Journal: Biophys J Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Thiyam Ramsing Singh; Abdullah Mahmood Ali; Valeria Busygina; Steven Raynard; Qiang Fan; Chang-hu Du; Paul R Andreassen; Patrick Sung; Amom Ruhikanta Meetei Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Xiaoyi Deng; Jeff E Habel; Venkataramen Kabaleeswaran; Edward H Snell; Marc S Wold; Gloria E O Borgstahl Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Bojana Lucic; Ying Zhang; Oliver King; Ramiro Mendoza-Maldonado; Matteo Berti; Frank H Niesen; Nicola A Burgess-Brown; Ashley C W Pike; Christopher D O Cooper; Opher Gileadi; Alessandro Vindigni Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Behzad Rad; Anthony L Forget; Ronald J Baskin; Stephen C Kowalczykowski Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gábor M Harami; Yeonee Seol; Junghoon In; Veronika Ferencziová; Máté Martina; Máté Gyimesi; Kata Sarlós; Zoltán J Kovács; Nikolett T Nagy; Yuze Sun; Tibor Vellai; Keir C Neuman; Mihály Kovács Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joseph A Newman; Pavel Savitsky; Charles K Allerston; Anna H Bizard; Özgün Özer; Kata Sarlós; Ying Liu; Els Pardon; Jan Steyaert; Ian D Hickson; Opher Gileadi Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 16.971