Literature DB >> 22252977

Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology.

Kara K Prickett1, Sarah K Wise, John M DelGaudio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analyses of office-based procedures in laryngology and otology have shown them to be safe and satisfying for patients, with substantial savings of time and money for patients and physicians. The objectives of this study were to compare the billable charges and reimbursement for rhinologic procedures performed in the office with charges for procedures performed in an ambulatory surgery center operating room (OR).
METHODS: A retrospective, matched-pair cost analysis was performed. Patients who underwent office-based procedures between 2006 and 2011 were matched by Current Procedural Terminology® (CPT) code with patients who underwent similar procedures in the OR. Twenty-nine matched pairs were included. Charges for surgery, anesthesia, and facility usage were analyzed. Because surgery charges may be influenced by contracts with insurance providers, both the total billed charges and total allowed charges were analyzed using paired t tests. When a single office-based procedure was compared with multiple procedures performed during the same operation in the OR, anesthesia and facility charges were scaled to allow for more accurate comparison.
RESULTS: Mean total charges for office-based procedures were significantly less than for OR procedures ($2,737.17 vs $7,329.69, p < 0.001). Mean allowed charges for office-based procedures were significantly less than for OR procedures ($762.08 vs $5,835.09, p < 0.001). Mean scaled charges for office-based procedures were also significantly less than mean scaled charges for OR procedures ($762.08 vs $4,089.33, p < 0.001). Office procedures were reimbursed at similar or higher rates than were OR procedures.
CONCLUSION: In appropriate patients, performing simple rhinologic procedures in the office rather than in the OR offers significant cost savings without impacting physician reimbursement.
Copyright © 2012 American Rhinologic Society-American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252977     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  4 in total

1.  Cost and Complications of Percutaneous Fixation of Hand Fractures in a Procedure Room Versus the Operating Room.

Authors:  Mark T Garon; Patrick Massey; Andreas Chen; Trevor Carroll; Bradley G Nelson; Anne M Hollister
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-06-29

2.  Operative utilization of balloon versus traditional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ference; Madeline Graber; David Conley; Rakesh K Chandra; Bruce K Tan; Charlesnika Evans; Melissa Pynnonen; Stephanie S Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Complex Nasal Reconstruction in a Wide-awake Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Efficacy and Perioperative Patient Experience.

Authors:  Hannah N St Denis-Katz; Michael Bastianelli; Jillian Macdonald; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  In-office balloon dilation and drainage of frontal sinus mucocele.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Pratik A Shukla; Osamah J Choudhry; Jean Daniel Eloy; Paul D Langer
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2013
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.