Literature DB >> 22252882

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients with operable breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving treatment after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: risk factors of IBTR and validation of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index.

Makoto Ishitobi1, Shozo Ohsumi, Hideo Inaji, Shinji Ohno, Hideo Shigematsu, Futoshi Akiyama, Takuji Iwase, Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Nobuaki Sato, Kaoru Takahashi, Shoji Oura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after patients undergo breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (breast-conserving treatment [BCT]) subsequent to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The objective of the current study was to analyze these risk factors.
METHODS: The authors collected data from 375 patients who underwent BCT and received NAC and analyzed the risk of IBTR associated with undergoing BCT after NAC. The usefulness of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index (MDAPI) for IBTR also was validated using the current data set.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47.8 months, and the 4-year IBTR-free survival rate was 95.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that estrogen receptor (ER) status and multifocality of the residual tumor were associated significantly with IBTR-free survival. In addition, patients who had ER-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors did not develop IBTR during the observation period. Although prognostic stratification according to MDAPI was relatively good for the prediction of IBTR in the study patients, the IBTR rate in the high-risk group was not very high and was lower than that in the intermediate-risk group. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that IBTR was an independent predictive factor for overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: ER status and multifocality of the residual tumor after NAC were independent predictors of IBTR after BCT. The MDAPI was barely adaptable to the study patients in terms of predicting IBTR. Patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors had a favorable prognosis, whereas patients who developed IBTR after NAC had significantly worse overall survival. The authors propose a new IBTR prognostic index using the 2 factors that were identified as predictive of IBTR: ER status and multifocality of the residual tumor.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252882     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

Review 1.  Local Recurrence after Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer - a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhou; Yujie Li
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Unusual Horner's Syndrome in Recurrent Breast Cancer: Evaluation Using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Tae Sung Kim; Seok-Ki Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Oncological safety of breast-conserving surgery after primary systemic chemotherapy in cT3-4 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kenjiro Jimbo; Takayuki Kinoshita; Sota Asaga; Takashi Hojo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Impact of factors affecting the residual tumor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Peter T Fwu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Surgical Outcomes of Primary Versus Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Conservation Surgery: A Comparative Study from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Gaurav Agarwal; Chaitra Sonthineni; Sabaretnam Mayilvaganan; Anjali Mishra; Punita Lal; Vinita Agrawal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Makoto Ishitobi; Jun Okuno; Nobuyoshi Kittaka; Takahiro Nakayama; Hiroki Koyama; Yasuhiro Tamaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Guilherme Freire Angotti Carrara; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto; Lucas Faria Abrahão-Machado; Maria Mitzi Brentani; João Soares Nunes; Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira; René Aloisio da Costa Vieira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Predicting Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer by Ultrasound and Clinicopathological Features Using a Nomogram.

Authors:  Hao Cui; Dantong Zhao; Peng Han; Xudong Zhang; Wei Fan; Xiaoxuan Zuo; Panting Wang; Nana Hu; Hanqing Kong; Fuhui Peng; Ying Wang; Jiawei Tian; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Fine-needle aspirates CYFRA 21-1 is a useful tumor marker for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Kyung Hwa Han; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Min Jung Kim; Young Joo Suh; Ji Soo Choi; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prediction of local recurrence risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer: Clinical utility of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index.

Authors:  Laura L Michel; Laura Sommer; Rosa González Silos; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Alexandra von Au; Julia Seitz; André Hennigs; Katharina Smetanay; Michael Golatta; Jörg Heil; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Andreas Schneeweiss; Frederik Marmé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.