Literature DB >> 22252546

Interviews with patients with advanced cancer--another step towards an international cancer pain classification system.

Anne Kari Knudsen1, Nina Aass, Ellen Heitzer, Pål Klepstad, Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Walter Schippinger, Elisabeth Brenne, Stein Kaasa, Elisabet Wasteson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients' involvement in the development of assessment tools is recommended, and the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative has adhered to this when developing a shared language for cancer pain, an international assessment and classification system. Study objectives were to investigate how patients ranked the relevance of several previously identified pain domains, to investigate patients' perception of the pain experience and to disclose additional, relevant pain domains for cancer pain classification to those identified in the literature.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews with advanced cancer patients treated with opioids were performed and analysed verbatim. Patients scored the relevance of predefined pain domains on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale.
RESULTS: Thirty-three Norwegian and Austrian patients were included (16 females and 17 males); the mean age was 63 years, and the mean Karnofsky performance score was 65. The ranking of domains was as follows etiology (mean Numerical Rating Scale score, 8.5), duration (8.0), intensity (7.4), coping (7.1), physical (5.9) and psychological functioning (5.8). Sleep was identified as a new candidate domain to include in the system. The patients emphasised consequences of having pain, for example, poor physical functioning and psychological distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Previously identified pain domains were confirmed to be relevant to the patients; however, the ranking differed from the experts' ranking. Sleep disturbances may be added as a domain in a future classification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252546     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1361-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  29 in total

1.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  An international multicentre validation study of a pain classification system for cancer patients.

Authors:  Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Qualitative research: what this research paradigm has to offer to the understanding of pain.

Authors:  Nessa Coyle; Roma Tickoo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Patient-focused endpoints in advanced cancer: criterion-based validation of accelerometer-based activity monitoring.

Authors:  Richard J E Skipworth; Guro B Stene; Max Dahele; Paul O Hendry; Alexandra C Small; David Blum; Stein Kaasa; Peter Trottenberg; Lukas Radbruch; Florian Strasser; Tom Preston; Kenneth C H Fearon; Jorunn L Helbostad
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Which mini-mental state exam items can be used to screen for delirium and cognitive impairment?

Authors:  Peter M Fayers; Marianne J Hjermstad; Anette H Ranhoff; Stein Kaasa; Laila Skogstad; Pål Klepstad; Jon H Loge
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.

Authors:  E Bruera; N Kuehn; M J Miller; P Selmser; K Macmillan
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.250

8.  The Edmonton symptom assessment system--what do patients think?

Authors:  Sharon Watanabe; Cheryl Nekolaichuk; Crystal Beaumont; Asifa Mawani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  What patients with cancer want to know about pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Bender; Joanne Hohenadel; Jennifer Wong; Joel Katz; Lorraine E Ferris; Cindy Shobbrook; David Warr; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 10.  A "TNM" classification system for cancer pain: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP).

Authors:  Robin L Fainsinger; Cheryl L Nekolaichuk
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the cancer pain experience.

Authors:  Judith A Schreiber
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014

2.  Unresolved Pain Interference among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Implications for Patient Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Kelly Kenzik; Maria Pisu; Shelley A Johns; Tamara Baker; Robert A Oster; Elizabeth Kvale; Mona N Fouad; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.