Literature DB >> 22252396

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population.

Stanley S Franklin1, Lutgarde Thijs, Tine W Hansen, Yan Li, José Boggia, Masahiro Kikuya, Kristina Björklund-Bodegård, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Jørgen Jeppesen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Eamon Dolan, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Valérie Tikhonoff, Sofia Malyutina, Edoardo Casiglia, Yuri Nikitin, Lars Lind, Edgardo Sandoya, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Yutaka Imai, Jiguang Wang, Hans Ibsen, Eoin O'Brien, Jan A Staessen.   

Abstract

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252396      PMCID: PMC3607330          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.180653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  38 in total

1.  Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrie Beilin; Yutaka Imai; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin Myers; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Thomas Pickering; Josep Redon; Jan Staessen; George Stergiou; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Rita Facchetti; Michele Bombelli; Guido Grassi; Roberto Sega
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus self-measurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage.

Authors:  Valérie Gaborieau; Nicolas Delarche; Philippe Gosse
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Ambulatory and home blood pressure normality in the elderly: data from the PAMELA population.

Authors:  R Sega; G Cesana; C Milesi; G Grassi; A Zanchetti; G Mancia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study.

Authors:  Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Hirohito Metoki; Kei Asayama; Taku Obara; Junichiro Hashimoto; Kazuhito Totsune; Haruhisa Hoshi; Hiroshi Satoh; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure: normality and comparison with other measurements. Hypertension Working Group.

Authors:  C Schettini; M Bianchi; F Nieto; E Sandoya; H Senra
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  The International Database of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDACO): protocol and research perspectives.

Authors:  Lutgarde Thijs; Tine W Hansen; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Yan Li; Eamon Dolan; Valérie Tikhonoff; Jitka Seidlerová; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Stolarz; Manuel Bianchi; Tom Richart; Edoardo Casiglia; Sofia Malyutina; Jan Filipovsky; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Yuri Nikitin; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Edgardo Sandoya; Jiguang Wang; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Lind; Hans Ibsen; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  Single versus combined blood pressure components and risk for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Stanley S Franklin; Victor A Lopez; Nathan D Wong; Gary F Mitchell; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; F Curry Grant; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07
View more
  56 in total

1.  Prevalence and determinants of white coat effect in a large UK hypertension clinic population.

Authors:  O Thomas; K E Shipman; K Day; M Thomas; U Martin; I Dasgupta
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Masked Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Events in a Prospective Cohort of Blacks: The Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  John N Booth; Keith M Diaz; Samantha R Seals; Mario Sims; Joseph Ravenell; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Masked Hypertension and Elevated Nighttime Blood Pressure in CKD: Prevalence and Association with Target Organ Damage.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; Arnold B Alper; Amanda H Anderson; Carolyn S Brecklin; Jeanne Charleston; Jing Chen; Rajat Deo; Michael J Fischer; Jiang He; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Yonghong Huan; Martin G Keane; John W Kusek; Gail K Makos; Edgar R Miller; Elsayed Z Soliman; Susan P Steigerwalt; Jonathan J Taliercio; Raymond R Townsend; Matthew R Weir; Jackson T Wright; Dawei Xie; Mahboob Rahman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries.

Authors:  Manuel Gorostidi; Ernest Vinyoles; José R Banegas; Alejandro de la Sierra
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Ambulatory not office blood pressure predicts mortality also in the elderly.

Authors:  Michael Bursztyn
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Authors:  Sante D Pierdomenico; Anna M Pierdomenico; Francesca Coccina; Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Iddo Z Ben-Dov; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; José R Banegas; Luis M Ruilope; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 7.  Implementing ABPM into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alan L Hinderliter; Raven A Voora; Anthony J Viera
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Complementary Strategy for Hypertension Diagnosis and Management in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Marwah Abdalla
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Hypertension: Resistant hypertension matters in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Karl F Hilgers
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Rates, amounts, and determinants of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring claim reimbursements among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; Daichi Shimbo; Lei Huang; Keith M Diaz; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.