Literature DB >> 22252341

Aerial perches and free-range laying hens: the effect of access to aerial perches and of individual bird parameters on keel bone injuries in commercial free-range laying hens.

C J Donaldson1, M E E Ball, N E O'Connell.   

Abstract

The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of aerial perches on keel bone injuries and tibia bone characteristics in free-range laying hens. The relationship between keel bone injuries and individual bird parameters, such as weight, girth, wing:girth ratio, feather coverage, and tibia bone characteristics, was also assessed. Five commercial free-range houses, each containing between 7,000 and 8,000 birds, were used. The houses and range areas were divided in half; in half of the house, birds had access to aerial perches (P) and in the other half, they did not (NP). On 13 occasions between 17 and 70 wk of age, 20 birds per treatment were randomly selected from the slatted area and palpated for keel bone injury. At 72 wk of age, 30 birds per treatment in each of 4 houses were selected at random, weighed, and then euthanized. Girth and wing area and feather coverage were measured. The keel and left tibia bones were removed and keel bones were scored for injury. Tibia bones were weighed and diameter, length, breaking strength, and ash content recorded. Results indicated that access to aerial perches did not affect tibia bone measures (P > 0.05). Average palpated keel bone score increased with age of the hens (P < 0.001) but was not significantly affected by perch treatment (P > 0.05). There was a significant interaction between treatment and farm on keel bone injuries measured at dissection (P < 0.05), with the probability of birds having high keel-damage scores increasing in the perched treatment in some farms but not others. In general, as the keel bone injury score measured at dissection increased, the breaking strength (P < 0.001) and ash content (P < 0.05) of the tibia bone decreased. It is suggested that individual variation in bone strength contributes to differences in susceptibility to keel injury. No relationship existed between keel-injury score measured at dissection and individual parameters, such as weight, girth, or wing:girth ratio (P > 0.05), although feather coverage tended to decline with increasing keel damage (P < 0.06).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252341     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  Soft perches in an aviary system reduce incidence of keel bone damage in laying hens.

Authors:  Ariane Stratmann; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Lars Schrader; Michael J Toscano; Hanno Würbel; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Lena K Hinrichsen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  Limited Associations between Keel Bone Damage and Bone Properties Measured with Computer Tomography, Three-Point Bending Test, and Analysis of Minerals in Swiss Laying Hens.

Authors:  Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Andreas Pfulg; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Susanna Käppeli; Dominik Guggisberg; Annette Liesegang; Michael H Stoffel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  Genetic Parameter Estimation and Whole Sequencing Analysis of the Genetic Architecture of Chicken Keel Bending.

Authors:  Zhihao Zhang; Weifang Yang; Tao Zhu; Liang Wang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Guoqiang Zhao; Lujiang Qu; Yaxiong Jia
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens-Its Relation to Bone Mineral Density, Body Growth Rate and Laying Performance.

Authors:  Christin Habig; Martina Henning; Ulrich Baulain; Simon Jansen; Armin Manfred Scholz; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Development of an ex vivo protocol to model bone fracture in laying hens resulting from collisions.

Authors:  Michael J Toscano; Lindsay J Wilkins; Georgina Millburn; Katherine Thorpe; John F Tarlton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Teresa M Casey-Trott; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Effect of high concentrations of dietary vitamin D3 on pullet and laying hen performance, skeleton health, eggshell quality, and yolk vitamin D3 content when fed to W36 laying hens from day of hatch until 68 wk of age.

Authors:  J Wen; K A Livingston; M E Persia
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Various bone parameters are positively correlated with hen body weight while range access has no beneficial effect on tibia health of free-range layers.

Authors:  M Kolakshyapati; R J Flavel; T Z Sibanda; D Schneider; M C Welch; I Ruhnke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.