Literature DB >> 22251726

Influence of honey bee, Apis mellifera, hives and field size on foraging activity of native bee species in pumpkin fields.

Derek R Artz1, Cynthia L Hsu, Brian A Nault.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify bee species active in pumpkin fields in New York and to estimate their potential as pollinators by examining their foraging activity. In addition, we examined whether foraging activity was affected by either the addition of hives of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L., or by field size. Thirty-five pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) fields ranging from 0.6 to 26.3 ha, 12 supplemented with A. mellifera hives and 23 not supplemented, were sampled during peak flowering over three successive weeks in 2008 and 2009. Flowers from 300 plants per field were visually sampled for bees on each sampling date. A. mellifera, Bombus impatiens Cresson, and Peponapis pruinosa (Say) accounted for 99% of all bee visits to flowers. A. mellifera and B. impatiens visited significantly more pistillate flowers than would be expected by chance, whereas P. pruinosa showed no preference for visiting pistillate flowers. There were significantly more A. mellifera visits per flower in fields supplemented with A. mellifera hives than in fields not supplemented, but there were significantly fewer P. pruinosa visits in supplemented fields. The number of B. impatiens visits was not affected by supplementation, but was affected by number of flowers per field. A. mellifera and P. pruinosa visits were not affected by field size, but B. impatiens visited fewer flowers as field size increased in fields that were not supplemented with A. mellifera hives. Declining A. mellifera populations may increase the relative importance of B. impatiens in pollinating pumpkins in New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22251726     DOI: 10.1603/EN10218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  3 in total

1.  Experimental evidence that honeybees depress wild insect densities in a flowering crop.

Authors:  Sandra A M Lindström; Lina Herbertsson; Maj Rundlöf; Riccardo Bommarco; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Use of video surveillance to measure the influences of habitat management and landscape composition on pollinator visitation and pollen deposition in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) agroecosystems.

Authors:  Benjamin W Phillips; Mary M Gardiner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented.

Authors:  Jessica D Petersen; Stephen Reiners; Brian A Nault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.