Literature DB >> 22250865

Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.

Liqiang Huang1, Lei Mo, Ying Li.   

Abstract

A large part of the empirical research in the field of visual attention has focused on various concrete paradigms. However, as yet, there has been no clear demonstration of whether or not these paradigms are indeed measuring the same underlying construct. We collected a very large data set (nearly 1.3 million trials) to address this question. We tested 257 participants on nine paradigms: conjunction search, configuration search, counting, tracking, feature access, spatial pattern, response selection, visual short-term memory, and change blindness. A fairly general attention factor was identified. Some of the participants were also tested on eight other paradigms. This general attention factor was found to be correlated with intelligence, visual marking, task switching, mental rotation, and Stroop task. On the other hand, a few paradigms that are very important in the attention literature (attentional capture, consonance-driven orienting, and inhibition of return) were found to be dissociated from this general attention factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250865     DOI: 10.1037/a0026314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Mental chronometry and individual differences: modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

2.  Tracking within-category colors is easier: Color categories modulate location processing in a dynamic visual task.

Authors:  Mengdan Sun; Luming Hu; Lingxia Fan; Xuemin Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

3.  Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Working Memory in Childhood.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Steven A Martinez; Kristina M Rapuano; May I Conley; Alexandra O Cohen; M Daniela Cornejo; Donald J Hagler; Wesley J Meredith; Kevin M Anderson; Tor D Wager; Eric Feczko; Eric Earl; Damien A Fair; Deanna M Barch; Richard Watts; B J Casey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A relational structure of voluntary visual-attention abilities.

Authors:  KatieAnn Skogsberg; Marcia Grabowecky; Joshua Wilt; William Revelle; Lucica Iordanescu; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models.

Authors:  M D Rosenberg; E S Finn; D Scheinost; R T Constable; M M Chun
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Speech and non-speech measures of audiovisual integration are not correlated.

Authors:  Jonathan M P Wilbiks; Violet A Brown; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Unequal allocation of overt and covert attention in Multiple Object Tracking.

Authors:  Veronica Hadjipanayi; Andria Shimi; Casimir J H Ludwig; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 8.  Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Stephan Schwan; Markus Huff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

10.  How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Melissa Treviño; Xiaoshu Zhu; Yi Yi Lu; Luke S Scheuer; Eliza Passell; Grace C Huang; Laura T Germine; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.