Literature DB >> 22250840

Ectopic bone regeneration by human bone marrow mononucleated cells, undifferentiated and osteogenically differentiated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds.

Xinhai Ye1, Xiaofan Yin, Dawei Yang, Jian Tan, Guangpeng Liu.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering approaches using the combination of porous ceramics and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) represent a promising bone substitute for repairing large bone defects. Nevertheless, optimal conditions for constructing tissue-engineered bone have yet to be determined. It remains unclear if transplantation of predifferentiated BMSCs is superior to undifferentiated BMSCs or freshly isolated bone marrow mononucleated cells (BMNCs) in terms of new bone formation in vivo. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of in vitro osteogenic differentiation (β-glycerophosphate, dexamethasone, and l-ascorbic acid) of human BMSCs on the capability to form tissue-engineered bone in unloaded conditions after subcutaneous implantation in nude mice. After isolation from human bone marrow aspirates, BMNCs were divided into three parts: one part was seeded onto porous beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics immediately and transplanted in a heterotopic nude mice model; two parts were expanded in vitro to passage 2 before cell seeding and in vivo transplantation, either under osteogenic conditions or not. Animals were sacrificed for micro-CT and histological evaluation at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks postimplantation. The results showed that BMSCs differentiated into osteo-progenitor cells after induction, as evidenced by the altered cell morphology and elevated alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition, but their clonogenicity, proliferating rate, and seeding efficacy were not significantly affected by osteogenic differentiation, compared with undifferentiated cells. Extensive new bone formed in the pores of all the scaffolds seeded with predifferentiated BMSCs at 4 weeks after implantation, and maintained for 20 weeks. On the contrary, scaffolds containing undifferentiated BMSCs revealed limited bone formation only in 1 out of 6 cases at 8 weeks, and maintained for 4 weeks. For scaffolds with BMNCs, woven bone was observed sporadically only in one case at 8 weeks. Overall, this study suggests that ectopic osteogenesis of cell/scaffold composites is more dependent on the in vitro expansion condition, and osteo-differentiated BMSCs hold the highest potential concerning in vivo bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250840     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  15 in total

1.  Ice-Templated Protein Nanoridges Induce Bone Tissue Formation.

Authors:  Mingying Yang; Yajun Shuai; Kegan S Sunderland; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Multimodular vascularized bone construct comprised of vasculogenic and osteogenic microtissues.

Authors:  Nicholas G Schott; Huy Vu; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.395

3.  Gene Therapy for Bone Repair Using Human Cells: Superior Osteogenic Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-Transduced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adipose Tissue Compared to Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Sofia Bougioukli; Osamu Sugiyama; William Pannell; Brandon Ortega; Matthew H Tan; Amy H Tang; Robert Yoho; Daniel A Oakes; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.695

4.  Synergistic enhancement of ectopic bone formation by supplementation of freshly isolated marrow cells with purified MSC in collagen-chitosan hydrogel microbeads.

Authors:  Joel K Wise; Andrea I Alford; Steven A Goldstein; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.417

5.  Comparison of uncultured marrow mononuclear cells and culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells in 3D collagen-chitosan microbeads for orthopedic tissue engineering.

Authors:  Joel K Wise; Andrea I Alford; Steven A Goldstein; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Cell-secreted matrices perpetuate the bone-forming phenotype of differentiated mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Allison I Hoch; Vaishali Mittal; Debika Mitra; Nina Vollmer; Christopher A Zikry; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Coculture of Endothelial and Stromal Cells to Promote Concurrent Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis.

Authors:  Nicholas G Schott; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 8.  Coupling Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis in Engineered Orthopedic Tissues.

Authors:  Nicholas G Schott; Nicole E Friend; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Ectopic osteogenesis and scaffold biodegradation of nano-hydroxyapatite-chitosan in a rat model.

Authors:  Yiqun He; Youhai Dong; Fuzhai Cui; Xujun Chen; Rongqiang Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Osteogenic matrix cell sheet transplantation enhances early tendon graft to bone tunnel healing in rabbits.

Authors:  Yusuke Inagaki; Kota Uematsu; Manabu Akahane; Yusuke Morita; Munehiro Ogawa; Tomoyuki Ueha; Takamasa Shimizu; Tomohiko Kura; Kenji Kawate; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.