Literature DB >> 22250190

The children and sunscreen study: a crossover trial investigating children's sunscreen application thickness and the influence of age and dispenser type.

Abbey Diaz1, Rachel E Neale, Michael G Kimlin, Lee Jones, Monika Janda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the thickness at which primary schoolchildren apply sunscreen on school day mornings and to compare it with the thickness (2.00 mg/cm(2)) at which sunscreen is tested during product development, as well as to investigate how application thickness was influenced by age of the child (school grades 1-7) and by dispenser type (500-mL pump, 125-mL squeeze bottle, or 50-mL roll-on).
DESIGN: A crossover quasiexperimental study design comparing 3 sunscreen dispenser types.
SETTING: Children aged 5 to 12 years from public primary schools (grades 1-7) in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Children (n=87) and their parents randomly recruited from the enrollment lists of 7 primary schools. Each child provided up to 3 observations (n=258). INTERVENTION: Children applied sunscreen during 3 consecutive school weeks (Monday through Friday) for the first application of the day using a different dispenser each week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thickness of sunscreen application (in milligrams per square centimeter). The dispensers were weighed before and after use to calculate the weight of sunscreen applied. This was divided by the coverage area of application (in square centimeters), which was calculated by multiplying the children's body surface area by the percentage of the body covered with sunscreen.
RESULTS: Children applied their sunscreen at a median thickness of 0.48 mg/cm(2). Children applied significantly more sunscreen when using the pump (0.75 mg/cm(2)) and the squeeze bottle (0.57 mg/cm(2)) compared with the roll-on (0.22 mg/cm(2)) (P<.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, primary schoolchildren apply sunscreen at substantially less than 1.00 mg/cm(2), similar to what has been observed among adults. Some sunscreen dispensers seem to facilitate thicker application than others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250190     DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.2586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  5 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of a sun protection intervention for children of melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Mary K Tripp; Susan K Peterson; Alexander V Prokhorov; Sanjay S Shete; Diana L Urbauer; Bryan M Fellman; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Assessing the current market of sunscreen: a cross-sectional study of sunscreen availability in three metropolitan counties in the United States.

Authors:  Kyle T Amber; Romi Bloom; Patrick Staropoli; Sonam Dhiman; Shasa Hu
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2014-05-15

3.  Promoting sunscreen use in adolescents playing outdoor sports using UV detection stickers.

Authors:  Caitlin Horsham; Helen Ford; Elke Hacker
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-07-13

4.  Sun protection preferences and behaviors among young adult males during maximum ultraviolet radiation exposure activities.

Authors:  Marilyn Wickenheiser; Mary Kate Baker; Rikki Gaber; Hanz Blatt; June K Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The use of sunscreen products among final year medicine and pharmacy students: A cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitude, practice, and perception.

Authors:  Ammar Ihsan Awadh; Shazia Jamshed; Ramadan M Elkalmi; Hazrina Hadi
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.