Literature DB >> 22250131

Water bathing alters threat perception in starlings.

Ben O Brilot1, Melissa Bateson.   

Abstract

The majority of bird taxa perform water bathing, but little is known about the adaptive value of this behaviour. If bathing is important for feather maintenance then birds that have not bathed should have poorer feather condition, compromised escape ability and therefore increased responsiveness to cues of predation. We conducted two experiments examining the behaviour of captive starlings responding to conspecific alarm calls. Birds that had no access to bathing water showed a decreased willingness to feed and increased their vigilance behaviour following an alarm call. We argue that birds denied access to bathing water interpreted an ambiguous cue of threat as requiring more caution than birds that had access, consistent with higher levels of anxiety. Our results support the provision of bathing water for captive birds as an important welfare measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250131      PMCID: PMC3367762          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  Laboratory birds: refinements in husbandry and procedures. Fifth report of BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 2.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

Review 3.  Anxiety: an evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Ben Brilot; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 4.  Use and husbandry of captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in scientific research: a review of current practice.

Authors:  Lucy Asher; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.471

  4 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.

Authors:  Ľubor Košťál; Zuzana Skalná; Katarína Pichová
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Supplementation of Lactobacillus early in life alters attention bias to threat in piglets.

Authors:  Else Verbeek; Johan Dicksved; Linda Keeling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Attention bias to threat indicates anxiety differences in sheep.

Authors:  Caroline Lee; Else Verbeek; Rebecca Doyle; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Towards a more practical attention bias test to assess affective state in sheep.

Authors:  Jessica E Monk; Rebecca E Doyle; Ian G Colditz; Sue Belson; Greg M Cronin; Caroline Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ever at the ready for events that never happen.

Authors:  Jos F Brosschot
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 6.  Generalized Unsafety Theory of Stress: Unsafe Environments and Conditions, and the Default Stress Response.

Authors:  Jos F Brosschot; Bart Verkuil; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Chronic stress influences attentional and judgement bias and the activity of the HPA axis in sheep.

Authors:  Else Verbeek; Ian Colditz; Dominique Blache; Caroline Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of early and later life environmental enrichment and personality on attention bias in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Lu Luo; Inonge Reimert; Elske N de Haas; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Valence and Intensity of Video Stimuli of Dogs and Conspecifics in Sheep: Approach-Avoidance, Operant Response, and Attention.

Authors:  Camille M C Raoult; Lorenz Gygax
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.