Literature DB >> 22250059

Initial and subsequent therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care using data from a vendor-based electronic health record.

Emily S Brouwer1, Suzanne L West, Marianne Kluckman, Dennis Wallace, Andrew L Masica, Edward Ewen, Rustam Kudyakov, Dunlei Cheng, James Bowen, Neil S Fleming.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a leading cause of death and disability, and its prevalence is increasing. When diet fails, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prescribed oral hypoglycemics for glycemic control. Few studies have explored initial use or change from initial oral hypoglycemic therapy in the primary care setting. We aimed to describe the utilization of initial oral hypoglycemics among newly diagnosed patients with diabetes from 1998-2009 and changes from initial to subsequent therapy among patients prescribed older oral hypoglycemic agents using electronic health records.
METHODS: This observational cohort study used electronic health records from newly diagnosed patients with T2DM between 1 January 1998 and 31 March 2009 at two large health systems in the USA. Oral hypoglycemics included older (biguanide, sulfonylurea, and thiazolidinedione) and newer agents (incretin mimetic agents, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and D-phenylalanine derivatives). Multinomial regression models were fit to evaluate initial older oral hypoglycemic medication. We used incidence density sampling and conditional logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of regimen change.
RESULTS: Most patients were treated from the biguanide class of oral hypoglycemics (67%), but there were differences in initial prescribing by age and race. HbA1c (Odds Ratio for HbA1c 7.0-8.9 vs < 7.0, 5.87 [95% Confidence Interval: 3.62-9.52]; Odds Ratio for HbA1c ≥ 9 vs < 7.0, 20.25 [95% Confidence Interval: 8.32-49.29] and Black people (Odds Ratio, 0.29 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.14, 0.60]) versus White people were associated with regimen change in the adjusted analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and demographic characteristics influence choice and duration of initial oral hypoglycemic treatment as well as regimen changes.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250059     DOI: 10.1002/pds.2262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Initial therapy, persistence and regimen change in a cohort of newly treated type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Ronan T Grimes; Kathleen Bennett; Lesley Tilson; Cara Usher; Susan M Smith; Martin C Henman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Combining Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors to Target Multiple Organ Defects in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  John E Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2020-05

Review 3.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Avi Baehr; Juliet C Peña; Dale J Hu
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-03-24

4.  Interrogation of a longitudinal, national pharmacy claims dataset to explore factors that predict the need for add-on therapy in older and socioeconomically disadvantaged Australians with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (T2DM).

Authors:  S S Kumar; H McManus; T Radovich; J R Greenfield; A Viardot; K M Williams; P Cronin; R O Day
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Initial combination of linagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: efficacy and safety in a randomised, double-blind 1-year extension study.

Authors:  T Haak; T Meinicke; R Jones; S Weber; M von Eynatten; H-J Woerle
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Prescription of oral antidiabetic drugs in Tyrol - Data from the Tyrol diabetes registry 2012-2015.

Authors:  Lukas Lunger; Andreas Melmer; Willi Oberaigner; Marco Leo; Martin Juchum; Karin Pölzl; Johannes Gänzer; Martha Innerebner; Egon Eisendle; Gertrud Beck; Hermann Kathrein; Bernhard Heindl; Hans Robert Schönherr; Monika Lechleitner; Herbert Tilg; Christoph Ebenbichler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  Factors influencing the development of primary care data collection projects from electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marie-Line Gentil; Marc Cuggia; Laure Fiquet; Camille Hagenbourger; Thomas Le Berre; Agnès Banâtre; Eric Renault; Guillaume Bouzille; Anthony Chapron
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Evaluation of effectiveness of treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients in Chin: A nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoling Cai; Dayi Hu; Changyu Pan; Guangwei Li; Juming Lu; Qiuhe Ji; Benli Su; Haoming Tian; Shen Qu; Jianping Weng; Danyi Zhang; Jie Xu; Linong Ji
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.232

9.  Glycaemic outcomes of an Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER vulnerable patIents: A randomized, controlled stUdy in type 2 diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM).

Authors:  Simon R Heller; Richard E Pratley; Alan Sinclair; Andreas Festa; Jacek Kiljański; Cynthia S Brusko; Ran Duan; Robert J Heine
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Reduced Glucose Variability With Glucose-Dependent Versus Glucose-Independent Therapies Despite Similar Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia Rates in a Randomized, Controlled Study of Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Richard E Pratley; Julio Rosenstock; Simon R Heller; Alan Sinclair; Robert J Heine; Jacek Kiljański; Cynthia S Brusko; Ran Duan; Andreas Festa
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.