OBJECTIVES: To determine pediatricians' attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding cardiac screening before initiating treatment with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: A survey of 1600 randomly selected, practicing US pediatricians with American Academy of Pediatrics membership was conducted. Multivariate models were created for 3 screening practices: (1) performing an in-depth cardiac history and physical (H & P) examination, (2) discussing potential stimulant-related cardiac risks, and (3) ordering an electrocardiogram (ECG). RESULTS: Of 817 respondents (51%), 525 (64%) met eligibility criteria. Regarding attitudes, pediatricians agreed that both the risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) (24%) and legal liability (30%) were sufficiently high to warrant cardiac assessment; 75% agreed that physicians were responsible for informing families about SCD risk. When identifying cardiac disorders, few (18%) recognized performing an in-depth cardiac H & P as a barrier; in contrast, 71% recognized interpreting a pediatric ECG as a barrier. When asked about cardiac screening practices before initiating stimulant treatment for a recent patient, 93% completed a routine H & P, 48% completed an in-depth cardiac H & P, and 15% ordered an ECG. Almost half (46%) reported discussing stimulant-related cardiac risks. Multivariate modeling indicated that ≥1 of these screening practices were associated with physicians' attitudes about SCD risk, legal liability, their responsibility to inform about risk, their ability to perform an in-depth cardiac H & P, and family concerns about risk. CONCLUSIONS: Variable pediatrician attitudes and cardiac screening practices reflect the limited evidence base and conflicting guidelines regarding cardiac screening. Barriers to identifying cardiac disorders influence practice.
OBJECTIVES: To determine pediatricians' attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding cardiac screening before initiating treatment with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: A survey of 1600 randomly selected, practicing US pediatricians with American Academy of Pediatrics membership was conducted. Multivariate models were created for 3 screening practices: (1) performing an in-depth cardiac history and physical (H & P) examination, (2) discussing potential stimulant-related cardiac risks, and (3) ordering an electrocardiogram (ECG). RESULTS: Of 817 respondents (51%), 525 (64%) met eligibility criteria. Regarding attitudes, pediatricians agreed that both the risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) (24%) and legal liability (30%) were sufficiently high to warrant cardiac assessment; 75% agreed that physicians were responsible for informing families about SCD risk. When identifying cardiac disorders, few (18%) recognized performing an in-depth cardiac H & P as a barrier; in contrast, 71% recognized interpreting a pediatric ECG as a barrier. When asked about cardiac screening practices before initiating stimulant treatment for a recent patient, 93% completed a routine H & P, 48% completed an in-depth cardiac H & P, and 15% ordered an ECG. Almost half (46%) reported discussing stimulant-related cardiac risks. Multivariate modeling indicated that ≥1 of these screening practices were associated with physicians' attitudes about SCD risk, legal liability, their responsibility to inform about risk, their ability to perform an in-depth cardiac H & P, and family concerns about risk. CONCLUSIONS: Variable pediatrician attitudes and cardiac screening practices reflect the limited evidence base and conflicting guidelines regarding cardiac screening. Barriers to identifying cardiac disorders influence practice.
Authors: Hedi Schelleman; Warren B Bilker; Brian L Strom; Stephen E Kimmel; Craig Newcomb; James P Guevara; Gregory W Daniel; Mark J Cziraky; Sean Hennessy Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: James Swanson; Laurence Greenhill; Tim Wigal; Scott Kollins; Annamarie Stehli; Mark Davies; Shirley Chuang; Benedetto Vitiello; Anne Skrobala; Kelly Posner; Howard Abikoff; Melvin Oatis; James McCRACKEN; James McGOUGH; Mark Riddle; Jaswinder Ghuman; Charles Cunningham; Sharon Wigal Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Vicki A Jackson; Amy M Sullivan; Nina M Gadmer; Deborah Seltzer; Ann M Mitchell; Mathew D Lakoma; Robert M Arnold; Susan D Block Journal: Acad Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Victoria L Vetter; Josephine Elia; Christopher Erickson; Stuart Berger; Nathan Blum; Karen Uzark; Catherine L Webb Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Christopher Sheldrick; Laurel K Leslie; Angie Mae Rodday; Susan K Parsons; Tully S Saunders; John B Wong Journal: J Atten Disord Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 3.256
Authors: Laurel K Leslie; Angie Mae Rodday; Tully S Saunders; Joshua T Cohen; John B Wong; R Christopher Sheldrick; Susan K Parsons Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.576