Literature DB >> 22248749

[A clinical study of pituitrin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of patients with septic shock].

Xu-dong Han1, Hua Sun, Xiao-ying Huang, Su-yan Zhang, Ya-dong Wang, Ke Ren, Feng Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pituitrin can lower 28-day mortality as compared with treatment with norepinephrine (NE) in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted. One hundred and thirty-nine septic shock patients with dopamine requirements exceeding 5 μg×kg(-1)×min(-1) were divided at random into two groups as the study group and control group. All patients enrolled were treated by the same treatment principle and measures. In patients of study group injection of pituitrin 0.017-0.042 U/min (1.0- 2.5 U/h) was given, and if hemodynamics was still unstable, catecholamines was added to obtain the target blood pressure; while in the control group catecholamines was given to maintain stability of hemodynamics.
RESULTS: Among 139 patients enrolled in the study, 66 composed of the clinical study group and 73 in the control group. The main principle of the treatment in the two groups was similar. There was no significant difference in overall 28-day mortality rate between study group and control group (40.9% vs. 46.6%, P > 0.05). In patients whose acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II ( APACHE II ) score was less than 25, the mortality of study group was significantly lower than that of control group [10.3% (3/29) vs. 35.7% (10/28), P < 0.05]. The length of stay in intensive care unit [ICU, days: 5(3,8) vs. 5(3,8)], and duration of mechanical ventilation [days: 4.0 (2.8, 6.0) vs. 4.0 (2.0, 5.0)] were similar in two groups (both P > 0.05). The dosage of NE (μg/min: 7.99 ± 5.02 vs. 10.12 ± 5.12) and heart rate (beat/min: 93.27 ± 7.84 vs. 108.45 ± 12.31) were significantly lower in study group compared with that of control group (both P < 0.05). Serum creatinine and lactate levels in the two groups were similar at baseline, and creatinine [μmol/L: 87.5 (62.8, 157.0) vs. 76.0 (52.5, 117.0)] and lactate level (mmol/L: 3.72 ± 2.47 vs. 3.53 ± 1.86) were still similar in two groups 24 hours later (all P > 0.05). The rate of use of glucocorticoid (43.9% vs. 31.5%) and heparin in small dosage (42.4% vs. 41.1%) had no significant difference between two groups (both P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of pituitrin in patients with septic shock can reduce the dosage of catecholamines, and decrease the heart rate. Although it can not lower the overall mortality of septic shock, among patients with less severity whose APACHE II score lower than 25, low-dose pituitrin in conjunction with catecholamine vasopressors can reduce 28-day mortality .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue        ISSN: 1003-0603


  4 in total

Review 1.  Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Kevin J Um; Waleed Alhazzani; Alexandra P Lengyel; Ludhmila Hajjar; Anthony C Gordon; François Lamontagne; Jeff S Healey; Richard P Whitlock; Emilie P Belley-Côté
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lu Cheng; Jing Yan; Shutang Han; Qiuhua Chen; Mingqi Chen; Hua Jiang; Jun Lu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Clinical Efficiency of Vasopressin or Its Analogs in Comparison With Catecholamines Alone on Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ren-Qi Yao; De-Meng Xia; Li-Xue Wang; Guo-Sheng Wu; Yi-Bing Zhu; Hong-Qiang Zhao; Qi Liu; Zhao-Fan Xia; Chao Ren; Yong-Ming Yao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Applicability of Vasopressor Trials in Adult Critical Care: A Prospective Multicentre Meta-Epidemiologic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nina Buchtele; Michael Schwameis; Dominik Roth; Franz Schwameis; Felix Kraft; Roman Ullrich; Jakob Mühlbacher; Roberta Laggner; Gunnar Gamper; Georg Semmler; Christian Schoergenhofer; Thomas Staudinger; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 5.814

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.