Literature DB >> 22248730

Predicting the psychophysical similarity of faces and non-face complex shapes by image-based measures.

Xiaomin Yue1, Irving Biederman, Michael C Mangini, Christoph von der Malsburg, Ori Amir.   

Abstract

Shape representation is accomplished by a series of cortical stages in which cells in the first stage (V1) have local receptive fields tuned to contrast at a particular scale and orientation, each well modeled as a Gabor filter. In succeeding stages, the representation becomes largely invariant to Gabor coding (Kobatake & Tanaka, 1994). Because of the non-Gabor tuning in these later stages, which must be engaged for a behavioral response (Tong, 2003; Tong et al., 1998), a V1-based measure of shape similarity based on Gabor filtering would not be expected to be highly correlated with human performance when discriminating complex shapes (faces and teeth-like blobs) that differ metrically on a two-choice, match-to-sample task. Here we show that human performance is highly correlated with Gabor-based image measures (Gabor simple and complex cells), with values often in the mid 0.90s, even without discounting the variability in the speed and accuracy of performance not associated with the similarity of the distractors. This high correlation is generally maintained through the stages of HMAX, a model that builds upon the Gabor metric and develops units for complex features and larger receptive fields. This is the first report of the psychophysical similarity of complex shapes being predictable from a biologically motivated, physical measure of similarity. As accurate as these measures were for accounting for metric variation, a simple demonstration showed that all were insensitive to viewpoint invariant (nonaccidental) differences in shape.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248730     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Functional outcomes following lesions in visual cortex: Implications for plasticity of high-level vision.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Topological Relations Between Objects Are Categorically Coded.

Authors:  Andrew Lovett; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Investigating the Influence of Autism Spectrum Traits on Face Processing Mechanisms in Developmental Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Regan Fry; Xian Li; Travis C Evans; Michael Esterman; James Tanaka; Joseph DeGutis
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-09-29

5.  Visual stream connectivity predicts assessments of image quality.

Authors:  Elijah F W Bowen; Antonio M Rodriguez; Damian R Sowinski; Richard Granger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Face dissimilarity judgments are predicted by representational distance in morphable and image-computable models.

Authors:  Kamila M Jozwik; Jonathan O'Keeffe; Katherine R Storrs; Wenxuan Guo; Tal Golan; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  The Lateral Occipital Complex shows no net response to object familiarity.

Authors:  Eshed Margalit; Manan P Shah; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman; Brenton Keller; Rorry Brenner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Preference for Averageness in Faces Does Not Generalize to Non-Human Primates.

Authors:  Olivia B Tomeo; Leslie G Ungerleider; Ning Liu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  How Configural Is the Configural Superiority Effect? A Neuroimaging Investigation of Emergent Features in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Olivia M Fox; Assaf Harel; Kevin B Bennett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-23

10.  Skeletal descriptions of shape provide unique perceptual information for object recognition.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.