Literature DB >> 22248595

Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study.

Babac Vahabzadeh1, Anil B Seetharam, Michael B Cook, Sachin Wani, Amit Rastogi, Ajay Bansal, Dayna S Early, Prateek Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Prague C & M criteria, developed for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus (BE), (C = circumferential length, M = maximal length) were previously validated among a panel of 29 expert endoscopists with a special interest in BE. Its performance among gastroenterology trainees is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To test interobserver agreement among gastroenterology trainees for the Prague C & M criteria, identification of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the diaphragmatic hiatus.
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: Two tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Standardized endoscopic videos were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: Eighteen high-quality videos (normal esophagus, short and long lengths of BE, equally distributed) were independently evaluated by 18 gastroenterology trainees (year 1, n = 5; year 2, n = 6; year 3, n = 7) after administration of a formal teaching module by an expert endoscopist. Overall intraclass correlation coefficients for assessment of the C and M extent of the endoscopic BE segment above the GEJ were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98), respectively. The overall intraclass correlation coefficients for GEJ and diaphragmatic hiatus location recognition were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.90 (0.82-0.95), respectively. The year of training did not affect interobserver agreement. LIMITATIONS: The use of videos for endoscopic evaluation.
CONCLUSION: After standardized teaching, the Prague C & M criteria have high overall validity among gastroenterology trainees irrespective of the level of training for endoscopic evaluation of visualized BE lengths as well as key endoscopic landmarks.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248595      PMCID: PMC4547779          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Early diagnosis of columnar-lined esophagus: a new endoscopic diagnostic criterion.

Authors:  S A McClave; H W Boyce; M R Gottfried
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Diagnostic inconsistencies in Barrett's esophagus. Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Study Group.

Authors:  S L Kim; J P Waring; S J Spechler; R E Sampliner; W G Doos; W F Krol; W O Williford
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Autofluorescence endoscopy in surveillance of Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter randomized trial on diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  J Borovicka; J Fischer; J Neuweiler; P Netzer; J Gschossmann; T Ehmann; P Bauerfeind; G Dorta; U Zürcher; J Binek; C Meyenberger
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; John Dent; David Armstrong; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Liebwin Gossner; Yoshio Hoshihara; Janusz A Jankowski; Ola Junghard; Lars Lundell; Guido N J Tytgat; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Interobserver reliability in the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of Barrett's esophagus: an Asian multinational study.

Authors:  Y C Lee; M B Cook; S Bhatia; W H Chow; E M El-Omar; H Goto; J T Lin; Y Q Li; P L Rhee; P Sharma; J J Sung; J Y Wong; J C Wu; K Y Ho
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Effect of segment length on risk for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett esophagus.

Authors:  R E Rudolph; T L Vaughan; B E Storer; R C Haggitt; P S Rabinovitch; D S Levine; B J Reid
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Risk of oesophageal cancer in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  M Solaymani-Dodaran; R F A Logan; J West; T Card; C Coupland
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Hiatal hernia size, Barrett's length, and severity of acid reflux are all risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Benjamin Avidan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas G Schnell; Gregorio Chejfec; Adrienne Metz; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  20 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with Barrett's epithelial dysplasia.

Authors:  Mikiko Fujita; Yuri Nakamura; Saeko Kasashima; Maiko Furukawa; Ryoichi Misaka; Hikaru Nagahara
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Carcinogenesis of Barrett's esophagus: a review of the clinical literature.

Authors:  Jiro Watari; Tadayuki Oshima; Hirokazu Fukui; Toshihiko Tomita; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14

Review 3.  Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Development of Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Eradication Therapies in Barrett's Esophagus: The TREAT-BE (Treatment With Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett's Esophagus) Consortium.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; V Raman Muthusamy; Nicholas J Shaheen; Rena Yadlapati; Robert Wilson; Julian A Abrams; Jacques Bergman; Amitabh Chak; Kenneth Chang; Ananya Das; John Dumot; Steven A Edmundowicz; Glenn Eisen; Gary W Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Lauren Gerson; Gregory G Ginsberg; David Grande; Matt Hall; Ben Harnke; John Inadomi; Janusz Jankowski; Charles J Lightdale; Jitin Makker; Robert D Odze; Oliver Pech; Richard E Sampliner; Stuart Spechler; George Triadafilopoulos; Michael B Wallace; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Location, size, and distance: criteria for quality in esophagogastroduodenos copy reporting for pre-operative gastric cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Nikila C Ravindran; Jovanka Vasilevska-Ristovska; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson Mahar; Yimeng Zhang; Nadia Gunraj; Rinku Sutradhar; Calvin H Law; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Application of the Prague C and M criteria for endoscopic description of columnar-lined esophagus in South Korea.

Authors:  Jung Wan Choe; Young Choon Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Hyo Jung Kim; Beom Jae Lee; Ji Hoon Kim; Jong Eun Yeon; Jong-Jae Park; Jae Seon Kim; Kwan Soo Byun; Young-Tae Bak
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-04-25

7.  Recurrent intestinal metaplasia after radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic findings and anatomic location.

Authors:  Cary C Cotton; W Asher Wolf; Sarina Pasricha; Nan Li; Ryan D Madanick; Melissa B Spacek; Kathleen Ferrell; Evan S Dellon; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  How Should We Report Endoscopic Results in Patient's with Barrett's Esophagus?

Authors:  Venkata Subhash Gorrepati; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Management strategies of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  BOB CAT: A Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett's Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Paul Moayyedi; Douglas A Corley; John DeCaestecker; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Gary Falk; Nimish Vakil; Scott Sanders; Michael Vieth; John Inadomi; David Aldulaimi; Khek-Yu Ho; Robert Odze; Stephen J Meltzer; Eamonn Quigley; Stuart Gittens; Peter Watson; Giovanni Zaninotto; Prasad G Iyer; Leo Alexandre; Yeng Ang; James Callaghan; Rebecca Harrison; Rajvinder Singh; Pradeep Bhandari; Raf Bisschops; Bita Geramizadeh; Philip Kaye; Sheila Krishnadath; M Brian Fennerty; Hendrik Manner; Katie S Nason; Oliver Pech; Vani Konda; Krish Ragunath; Imdadur Rahman; Yvonne Romero; Richard Sampliner; Peter D Siersema; Jan Tack; Tony C K Tham; Nigel Trudgill; David S Weinberg; Jean Wang; Kenneth Wang; Jennie Y Y Wong; Stephen Attwood; Peter Malfertheiner; David MacDonald; Hugh Barr; Mark K Ferguson; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.