Literature DB >> 22248016

Prompt before the choice is made: effects of a stair-climbing intervention in university buildings.

Amanda Lewis1, Frank Eves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent interventions report positive results following a multi-component campaign to increase stair climbing. This study investigated the effectiveness of volitional and motivational components of a stair-climbing intervention in the workplace. Design.  Interrupted time-series design.
METHODS: Ascending stair/lift choices, coded by gender, were observed between 08:00-10:00 and 14:15-16:15 on weekdays, in four university buildings (n = 14,138; 46% female). Baseline observations (stage 1; 5 days) preceded a motivational intervention, that is, a poster positioned inside the lift(s), that was positioned in each building (stage 2; 5 days). Next a volitional intervention, that is, point-of-choice prompt, supplemented the motivational one (stage 3; 8 days). Logistic regression analysis of stair/lift choices included the independent variables of intervention components, gender, time of day, building height, number of lifts, and pedestrian traffic.
RESULTS: There was no significant change in stair climbing when the motivational component was positioned alone (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.85-1.02, p = .123). In contrast, stair climbing increased significantly when the volitional component, that is, the point-of-choice prompt, was added (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.14-1.32, p < .001). During both stages, building height, number of lifts, time of day, and pedestrian traffic were all associated with stair climbing. No significant gender effects were seen.
CONCLUSIONS: A motivational component positioned alone, inside the lift(s) did not increase stair climbing. When a volitional component was added, that is, point-of-choice prompt positioned at the time and place where individuals choose their method of ascent, stair climbing increased significantly. Visibility of a prompt at the time behavioural choice is made appears necessary to change actual behaviour. ©2012 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248016     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  7 in total

1.  Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution.

Authors:  Anna Puig-Ribera; Anna M Señé-Mir; Guy A H Taylor-Covill; Núria De Lara; Douglas Carroll; Amanda Daley; Roger Holder; Erica Thomas; Raimon Milà; Frank F Eves
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Physical Activity Design Guidelines for School Architecture.

Authors:  Jeri Brittin; Dina Sorensen; Matthew Trowbridge; Karen K Lee; Dieter Breithecker; Leah Frerichs; Terry Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A multistage controlled intervention to increase stair climbing at work: effectiveness and process evaluation.

Authors:  Alice Bellicha; Aurélie Kieusseian; Anne-Marie Fontvieille; Antonio Tataranni; Nane Copin; Hélène Charreire; Jean-Michel Oppert
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Lesley M McGregor; Christian von Wagner; Wendy Atkin; Ines Kralj-Hans; Stephen P Halloran; Graham Handley; Richard F Logan; Sandra Rainbow; Steve Smith; Julia Snowball; Mary C Thomas; Samuel G Smith; Gemma Vart; Rosemary Howe; Nicholas Counsell; Allan Hackshaw; Stephen Morris; Stephen W Duffy; Rosalind Raine; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Workplace building design and office-based workers' activity: a study of a natural experiment.

Authors:  Jonine M Jancey; Sarah McGann; Robyn Creagh; Krysten D Blackford; Peter Howat; Marian Tye
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 6.  Choice architecture interventions to change physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of effects on intention, behavior and health outcomes during and after intervention.

Authors:  Lorraine L Landais; Olga C Damman; Linda J Schoonmade; Danielle R M Timmermans; Evert A L M Verhagen; Judith G M Jelsma
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  When weight is an encumbrance; avoidance of stairs by different demographic groups.

Authors:  Frank F Eves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.