| Literature DB >> 22247605 |
Takako Tominaga1, Misao Hachiya, Tomohiro Shibata, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Kenji Taki, Makoto Akashi.
Abstract
The vascular endothelium is important for the early and late effects observed in lethally irradiated tissue and organs. We examined the effects of exogenously added superoxide dismutase on cell survival and angiogenesis in lethally irradiated human primary umbilical vein endothelial cells. Cell survival was significantly improved in superoxide dismutase-treated cells; the addition of superoxide dismutase to cells after irradiation was also effective for increased survival, as it was before irradiation. Moreover, treatment of cells with superoxide dismutase enhanced the phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/extracellular signal regulated kinases 1 and 2 in human primary umbilical vein endothelial cells. The addition of superoxide dismutase to cells after irradiation attenuated the reduction of angiogenesis by irradiation, and inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/extracellular signal regulated kinases signaling pathway abrogated the rescue effect of superoxide dismutase. Our results suggest that superoxide dismutase rescues human primary umbilical vein endothelial cells from endothelial dysfunction caused by irradiation via a pathway requiring activation of mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/extracellular signal regulated kinases 1 and 2.Entities:
Keywords: SOD; angiogenesis; irradiation; survival
Year: 2011 PMID: 22247605 PMCID: PMC3246187 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.11-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Effects of SOD on survival of HUVECs after irradiation. HUVECs were cultured with 50 units/ml of SOD for 1 h and then irradiated with γ-ray (8 Gy/min) in the presence of SOD (squares, SOD + Irradiation). In parallel, cells were irradiated and then SOD was added to cell cultures (triangles, Irradiation + SOD). As control, cells were exposed to irradiation alone (circles, control). Colonies were stained with Giemsa 13 days after irradiation, and those having over 50 cells were counted. Results are presented as the mean of 5 separate experiments. Plating efficiencies of untreated control cells and SOD-treated cells were 0.027 ± 0.005 and 0.027 ± 0.004, respectively.
p values from comparison of surviving fractions among the three cell groups
| Dose (Gy) | Control vs Before-SOD | Control vs After-SOD | Before- vs After-SOD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0109 | 0.0017 | 0.1027 (ns) |
| 2 | 0.0013 | 0.0005 | 0.1810 (ns) |
| 4 | 0.0003 | 0.0007 | 0.0031 |
| 6 | 0.0061 | 0.0019 | 0.0237 |
Statistical analysis was performed for results presented in Fig. 1 and Table 1 as described in ”Materials and Methods”. ns: not significant.
Fig. 2Effects of SOD on tube formation in irradiated HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated with 20 Gy and then cultured on Matrigel® without (control) or with 5 units/ml of SOD for 16 h. For quantification of tube formation, the number of endotubes was counted in each microscopic field, and data from 4 fields of each well were analyzed. The number of endotubes in control was assumed to have 100% activity. Data represent mean ± SE from 3 experiments. (A) Representative photographs of capillary-like tube structures on Matrigel. (B) Quantification of numbers of endotubes in irradiated HUVECs. *p = 0.0164, **p = 0.0456,***p = 0.0198, ****p = 0.0139, *****p = 0.0399.
Effect of MEK/ERK pathway inhibition on angiogenesis by SOD in irradiated HUVECS
| (%) | |
|---|---|
| Untreated control | 100.0 ± 25.8*,** |
| Irradiation | 38.7 ± 5.6*,*** |
| PD98509 | 95.7 ± 9.7** |
| Irradiation + SOD | 65.6 ± 10.4***,**** |
| PD + Irradiation + SOD | 44.1 ± 6.7**** |
Cells were cultured with 10 µM of PD98059 for 1 h and then irradiated with 20 Gy. After irradiation, cells were plated onto Matrigel including 5 units/ml of SOD. Experiments were triplicated and results were expressed as percentage tube-forming capacity of untreated control cells. *p = 0.0079, **ns, ***p = 0.0084, ****p = 0.0197.
Fig. 3Effects of SOD on phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in irradiated HUVECs. (A) Effects of irradiation on phosphorylated ERK1/2. HUVECs were irradiated with 20 Gy and cultured for different durations. Cells were sequentially harvested at indicated times and subjected to western blot analysis using anti-ERK1/2 (ERK) or phospholylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) antibody. Levels of β-actin were used as loading control. (B) and (C) Effects of SOD on phosphorylated ERK1/2. Cells were treated with either 5 or 50 units/ml of SOD. Levels of phospholylated form of ERK1/2 were determined by western blotting. (D) Effects of SOD treatment either before or after irradiation on phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in irradiation. HUVECs were pre-treated with SOD (50 units/ml) for 1 h and then irradiated with 20 Gy in the presence of SOD (SOD + Irradiation), or they were irradiated and then SOD was added to cell cultures 30 min later (Irradiation + SOD). After culturing with SOD for 4 h, both groups of cells were subjected to western blot analysis. For inhibition of the MEK pathway, cells were treated with 50 µM of PD98059 for 30 min and then irradiated and/or treated with SOD.