Literature DB >> 22247269

The developmental trajectory of leaflet morphology in wild tomato species.

Daniel H Chitwood1, Lauren R Headland, Ravi Kumar, Jie Peng, Julin N Maloof, Neelima R Sinha.   

Abstract

Leaves between species vary in their size, serration, complexity, and shape. However, phylogeny is not the only predictor of leaf morphology. The shape of a leaf is the result of intricate developmental processes, including heteroblastic progression (changes in leaf size and shape at different nodes) and the developmental stage of an organ. The leaflets that arise from complex leaves are additionally modified by their positioning along the proximal-distal axis of a leaf and whether they fall on the left or right side of leaves. Even further, leaves are environmentally responsive, and their final shape is influenced by environmental inputs. Here, we comprehensively describe differences in leaflet shape between wild tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) species using a principal component analysis on elliptical Fourier descriptors arising from >11,000 sampled leaflets. We leverage differences in developmental rate to approximate a developmental series, which allows us to resolve the confounding differences in intrinsic leaflet form and developmental stage along positions of the heteroblastic leaf series and proximal-distal axis of leaves. We find that the resulting developmental trajectory of organs at different positions along these axes are useful for describing the changes in leaflet shape that occur during the shade avoidance response in tomato. We argue that it is the developmental trajectory, the changes in shape that occur over developmental time in organs reiterated at multiple positions, that is the relevant phenotype for discerning differences between populations and species, and to understand the underlying developmental processes that change during evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22247269      PMCID: PMC3291254          DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.192518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  26 in total

1.  Regulation of phyllotaxis by polar auxin transport.

Authors:  Didier Reinhardt; Eva-Rachele Pesce; Pia Stieger; Therese Mandel; Kurt Baltensperger; Malcolm Bennett; Jan Traas; Jirí Friml; Cris Kuhlemeier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors.

Authors:  H Iwata; Y Ukai
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 3.  Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants.

Authors:  R Scott Poethig
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs.

Authors:  Javier F Palatnik; Edwards Allen; Xuelin Wu; Carla Schommer; Rebecca Schwab; James C Carrington; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts?

Authors:  Connie Champagne; Neelima Sinha
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space.

Authors:  Nicolas B Langlade; Xianzhong Feng; Tracy Dransfield; Lucy Copsey; Andrew I Hanna; Christophe Thébaud; Andrew Bangham; Andrew Hudson; Enrico Coen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genetic control of surface curvature.

Authors:  Utpal Nath; Brian C W Crawford; Rosemary Carpenter; Enrico Coen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Arabidopsis thaliana leaf form evolved via loss of KNOX expression in leaves in association with a selective sweep.

Authors:  Paolo Piazza; C Donovan Bailey; Maria Cartolano; Jonathan Krieger; Jun Cao; Stephan Ossowski; Korbinian Schneeberger; Fei He; Juliette de Meaux; Neil Hall; Norman Macleod; Dmitry Filatov; Angela Hay; Miltos Tsiantis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.

Authors:  T Tsuge; H Tsukaya; H Uchimiya
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  24 in total

1.  Climate and Developmental Plasticity: Interannual Variability in Grapevine Leaf Morphology.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Susan M Rundell; Darren Y Li; Quaneisha L Woodford; Tommy T Yu; Jose R Lopez; Daniel Greenblatt; Julie Kang; Jason P Londo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A modern ampelography: a genetic basis for leaf shape and venation patterning in grape.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ciera C Martinez; Lauren R Headland; Thinh Thiem; Ravi Kumar; Michael F Covington; Tommy Hatcher; Daniel T Naylor; Sharon Zimmerman; Nora Downs; Nataly Raymundo; Edward S Buckler; Julin N Maloof; Mallikarjuna Aradhya; Bernard Prins; Lin Li; Sean Myles; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  In Vitro Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation to Hepatocyte Ceases Further Maturation at an Equivalent Stage of E15 in Mouse Embryonic Liver Development.

Authors:  Ravali Raju; David Chau; Tineke Notelaers; Chad L Myers; Catherine M Verfaillie; Wei-Shou Hu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Mapping morphological shape as a high-dimensional functional curve.

Authors:  Guifang Fu; Mian Huang; Wenhao Bo; Han Hao; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  LeafJ: an ImageJ plugin for semi-automated leaf shape measurement.

Authors:  Julin N Maloof; Kazunari Nozue; Maxwell R Mumbach; Christine M Palmer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Resolving distinct genetic regulators of tomato leaf shape within a heteroblastic and ontogenetic context.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ravi Kumar; Yasunori Ichihashi; Kristina Zumstein; Lauren R Headland; Enrique Ostria-Gallardo; José A Aguilar-Martínez; Susan Bush; Leonela Carriedo; Daniel Fulop; Ciera C Martinez; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Evolutionary developmental transcriptomics reveals a gene network module regulating interspecific diversity in plant leaf shape.

Authors:  Yasunori Ichihashi; José Antonio Aguilar-Martínez; Moran Farhi; Daniel H Chitwood; Ravi Kumar; Lee V Millon; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Light-Induced Indeterminacy Alters Shade-Avoiding Tomato Leaf Morphology.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Ravi Kumar; Aashish Ranjan; Julie M Pelletier; Brad T Townsley; Yasunori Ichihashi; Ciera C Martinez; Kristina Zumstein; John J Harada; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Dynamic transcriptomic profiles between tomato and a wild relative reflect distinct developmental architectures.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.