Literature DB >> 22247222

"Non-retinotopic processing" in Ternus motion displays modeled by spatiotemporal filters.

Arezoo Pooresmaeili1, Guido Marco Cicchini, Maria Concetta Morrone, David Burr.   

Abstract

Recently, M. Boi, H. Ogmen, J. Krummenacher, T. U. Otto, & M. H. Herzog (2009) reported a fascinating visual effect, where the direction of apparent motion was disambiguated by cues along the path of apparent motion, the Ternus-Pikler group motion, even though no actual movement occurs in this stimulus. They referred to their study as a "litmus test" to distinguish "non-retinotopic" (motion-based) from "retinotopic" (retina-based) image processing. We adapted the test to one with simple grating stimuli that could be more readily modeled and replicated their psychophysical results quantitatively with this stimulus. We then modeled our experiments in 3D (x, y, t) Fourier space and demonstrated that the observed perceptual effects are readily accounted for by integration of information within a detector that is oriented in space and time, in a similar way to previous explanations of other motion illusions. This demonstration brings the study of Boi et al. into the more general context of perception of moving objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22247222     DOI: 10.1167/12.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  Does spatio-temporal filtering account for nonretinotopic motion perception? Comment on Pooresmaeili, Cicchini, Morrone, and Burr (2012).

Authors:  Aaron M Clarke; Marc Repnow; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Automatic frame-centered object representation and integration revealed by iconic memory, visual priming, and backward masking.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatio-temporal priority revisited: the role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The fate of visible features of invisible elements.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-27

5.  Retinotopic encoding of the Ternus-Pikler display reflected in the early visual areas.

Authors:  Evelina Thunell; Wietske van der Zwaag; Haluk Ögmen; Gijs Plomp; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.