Literature DB >> 22247148

Candida zemplinina can reduce acetic acid produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in sweet wine fermentations.

Kalliopi Rantsiou1, Paola Dolci, Simone Giacosa, Fabrizio Torchio, Rosanna Tofalo, Sandra Torriani, Giovanna Suzzi, Luca Rolle, Luca Cocolin.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the possibility of using Candida zemplinina, as a partner of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in mixed fermentations of must with a high sugar content, in order to reduce its acetic acid production. Thirty-five C. zemplinina strains, which were isolated from different geographic regions, were molecularly characterized, and their fermentation performances were determined. Five genetically different strains were selected for mixed fermentations with S. cerevisiae. Two types of inoculation were carried out: coinoculation and sequential inoculation. A balance between the two species was generally observed for the first 6 days, after which the levels of C. zemplinina started to decrease. Relevant differences were observed concerning the consumption of sugars, the ethanol and glycerol content, and acetic acid production, depending on which strain was used and which type of inoculation was performed. Sequential inoculation led to the reduction of about half of the acetic acid content compared to the pure S. cerevisiae fermentation, but the ethanol and glycerol amounts were also low. A coinoculation with selected combinations of S. cerevisiae and C. zemplinina resulted in a decrease of ~0.3 g of acetic acid/liter, while maintaining high ethanol and glycerol levels. This study demonstrates that mixed S. cerevisiae and C. zemplinina fermentation could be applied in sweet wine fermentation to reduce the production of acetic acid, connected to the S. cerevisiae osmotic stress response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22247148      PMCID: PMC3298173          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06768-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Direct profiling of the yeast dynamics in wine fermentations.

Authors:  L Cocolin; L F Bisson; D A Mills
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Screening for the production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes by non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts.

Authors:  M L Strauss; N P Jolly; M G Lambrechts; P van Rensburg
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francesca Comitini; Mirko Gobbi; Paola Domizio; Cristina Romani; Livio Lencioni; Ilaria Mannazzu; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  Comparative evaluation of some oenological properties in wine strains of Candida stellata, Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ildikó Magyar; Tamás Tóth
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Yeast species associated with wine grapes in China.

Authors:  Shuang-Shi Li; Chao Cheng; Zheng Li; Jing-Yu Chen; Bin Yan; Bei-Zhong Han; Malcolm Reeves
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Influence of killer strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine fermentation.

Authors:  F Pérez; M Ramírez; J A Regodón
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Evaluation of fungal and yeast diversity in Slovakian wine-related microbial communities.

Authors:  Barbara Brežná; Katarína Zenišová; Katarína Chovanová; Viera Chebeňová; Lucia Kraková; Tomáš Kuchta; Domenico Pangallo
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Diversity of Candida zemplinina strains from grapes and Italian wines.

Authors:  Rosanna Tofalo; Maria Schirone; Sandra Torriani; Kalliopi Rantsiou; Luca Cocolin; Giorgia Perpetuini; Giovanna Suzzi
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 5.516

9.  Molecular identification and osmotolerant profile of wine yeasts that ferment a high sugar grape must.

Authors:  Rosanna Tofalo; Clemencia Chaves-López; Federico Di Fabio; Maria Schirone; Giovanna E Felis; Sandra Torriani; Antonello Paparella; Giovanna Suzzi
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Genetic characterization and phenotypic variability in Torulaspora delbrueckii species: Potential applications in the wine industry.

Authors:  Philippe Renault; Cecile Miot-Sertier; Philippe Marullo; Purificacion Hernández-Orte; Laure Lagarrigue; Aline Lonvaud-Funel; Marina Bely
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 5.277

View more
  23 in total

1.  Use of non-conventional yeast improves the wine aroma profile of Ribolla Gialla.

Authors:  Sofia Dashko; Nerve Zhou; Tinkara Tinta; Paolo Sivilotti; Melita Sternad Lemut; Kajetan Trost; Amparo Gamero; Teun Boekhout; Lorena Butinar; Urska Vrhovsek; Jure Piskur
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida zemplinina on quercetin, vitisin A and hydroxytyrosol contents in Sangiovese wines.

Authors:  Y Romboli; S Mangani; G Buscioni; L Granchi; M Vincenzini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Selection of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for orange wine fermentation based on their enological traits and volatile compounds formation.

Authors:  Lanlan Hu; Jia Wang; Xueao Ji; Rui Liu; Fusheng Chen; Xiuyan Zhang
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  The Use of Yeast Mixed Cultures for Deacidification and Improvement of the Composition of Cold Climate Grape Wines.

Authors:  Monika Cioch-Skoneczny; Michał Grabowski; Paweł Satora; Szymon Skoneczny; Krystian Klimczak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Multistarter from organic viticulture for red wine Montepulciano d'Abruzzo production.

Authors:  Giovanna Suzzi; Maria Schirone; Manuel Sergi; Rosa Maria Marianella; Giuseppe Fasoli; Irene Aguzzi; Rosanna Tofalo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Potential Role of Yeast Strains Isolated from Grapes in the Production of Taurasi DOCG.

Authors:  Maria Aponte; Giuseppe Blaiotta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The Oenological Potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum in Simultaneous and Sequential Co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Industrial Wine Production.

Authors:  Mariana Tristezza; Maria Tufariello; Vittorio Capozzi; Giuseppe Spano; Giovanni Mita; Francesco Grieco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Effect of Temperature on the Prevalence of Saccharomyces Non cerevisiae Species against a S. cerevisiae Wine Strain in Wine Fermentation: Competition, Physiological Fitness, and Influence in Final Wine Composition.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; María Lairón-Peris; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Past and Future of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts: From Spoilage Microorganisms to Biotechnological Tools for Improving Wine Aroma Complexity.

Authors:  Beatriz Padilla; José V Gil; Paloma Manzanares
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Aroma Profile of Montepulciano d'Abruzzo Wine Fermented by Single and Co-culture Starters of Autochthonous Saccharomyces and Non-saccharomyces Yeasts.

Authors:  Rosanna Tofalo; Francesca Patrignani; Rosalba Lanciotti; Giorgia Perpetuini; Maria Schirone; Paola Di Gianvito; Daniel Pizzoni; Giuseppe Arfelli; Giovanna Suzzi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.