Literature DB >> 22246622

Glaucoma therapy escalation in eyes with pseudophakic corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

George R Wandling1, Matthew P Rauen, Kenneth M Goins, Anna S Kitzmann, John E Sutphin, Young H Kwon, Wallace L M Alward, Michael D Wagoner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the prevalence of glaucoma therapy escalation (GTE) after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with a surgical indication of pseudophakic corneal edema. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of all patients who underwent PKP or DSAEK to treat pseudophakic corneal edema at a tertiary eye care center from January 1 2003 to December 31, 2006. Eyes that were treated with PKP from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004 and with DSAEK from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006 were included in the statistical analysis. Inclusion criteria included satisfactory preoperative control of intraocular pressure (IOP) and follow-up of at least 12 months. The main outcome measure was GTE, which was defined as a sustained requirement for escalation of topical medical therapy or the need to provide surgical intervention to maintain a satisfactory postoperative IOP. Among 54 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, GTE occurred in 7 (35.0%) of 20 eyes after PKP and in 14 (41.2%) of 34 eyes after DSAEK (P = 0.78) during a mean follow-up period of 27.6 and 28.6 months, respectively. Surgical escalation occurred in 2 (10.0%) eyes after PKP and 2 (5.9%) eyes after DSAEK (P = 0.62), and was associated with late-onset endothelial graft failure in all four eyes. Glaucoma therapy escalation is relatively common and occurs with comparable frequency in eyes with pseudophakic corneal edema after PKP and DSAEK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246622     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-011-9512-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  25 in total

1.  CORTICOSTEROIDS AND INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE.

Authors:  B BECKER; D W MILLS
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1963-10

Review 2.  Surgical alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty II: endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenneth M Goins
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Aphakic keratoplasty. Determining donor tissue size to avoid elevated intraocular pressure.

Authors:  R J Olson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-12

4.  A mathematical description of causative factors and prevention of elevated intraocular pressure after keratoplasty.

Authors:  R J Olson; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Oversize corneal donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  G N Foulks; H D Perry; C H Dohlman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty.

Authors:  D B Goldberg; D J Schanzlin; S I Brown
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma: risk factors, management and visual outcome.

Authors:  R Sihota; N Sharma; A Panda; H C Aggarwal; R Singh
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11

8.  Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma.

Authors:  C M Kirkness; L A Ficker
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  A M Chien; C M Schmidt; E J Cohen; R K Rajpal; L T Sperber; C J Rapuano; M Moster; M Smith; P R Laibson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Escalation of glaucoma therapy after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mansour Al-Mohaimeed; Sami Al-Shahwan; Abdullah Al-Torbak; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  M A Thiel; F Bochmann; A Schmittinger-Zirm; P B Bänninger; M K Schmid; C Kaufmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for failed keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hager; David L Phillips; Kenneth M Goins; Anna S Kitzmann; Mark A Greiner; Alex W Cohen; Jeffrey D Welder; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Feeder-free differentiation of cells exhibiting characteristics of corneal endothelium from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Michael D Wagoner; Laura R Bohrer; Benjamin T Aldrich; Mark A Greiner; Robert F Mullins; Kristan S Worthington; Budd A Tucker; Luke A Wiley
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  De novo ocular hypertension after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: comparative 3-year incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Errol W Chan; Tina T Wong; Hla M Htoon; Ching L Ho; Donald T Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.