Literature DB >> 22246411

Deep sedation in pediatric imaging: efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine.

C Heng Vong1, A Bajard, P Thiesse, E Bouffet, H Seban, P Marec Bérard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quality of MRI and CT depends largely on immobility of the patient during the procedure, which is often difficult to achieve without sedation in children below the age of 6 years.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine sedation for repeated imaging in young children treated for cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2003 to January 2007, information on children younger than 6 years of age having MRI or CT was prospectively collected. Forty-five minutes before the scan, a 10-min infusion of chlorpromazine 0.5 mg/kg was administered and managed by non-anesthetic staff. Patient monitoring included continuous measurement of pulse, respiration, oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Procedure-related parameters and adverse events were documented. Sedation was considered successful when the procedure was completed and at least 95% of images were usable.
RESULTS: One-hundred-one procedures (82 MRI, 19 CT) were evaluated in 62 children, 3-74 months old. Adequate sedation was achieved in 96% of cases, with mean induction time, 22 min; mean duration of sleep, 72 min, and mean duration of procedure, 33 min. Mean time spent in the radiology unit was 104 min. Ninety-six percent of imaging procedures were successfully completed. No cardiac, respiratory, neurological or allergic complication occurred.
CONCLUSION: Intravenous chlorpromazine is safe and effective for procedural sedation in young children with cancer undergoing MRI and CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246411     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2310-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  49 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of methohexital for procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Todd Austin; Gary M Vilke; Ellen Nyheim; Donna Kelly; Theodore C Chan
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Life-threatening reactions after pedodontic sedation: an assessment of narcotic, local anesthetic, and antiemetic drug interaction.

Authors:  J M Goodson; P A Moore
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation.

Authors:  J P Acworth; D Purdie; R C Clark
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Methohexital sedation of children undergoing CT scan.

Authors:  P D Varner; J P Ebert; R D McKay; C S Nail; T M Whitlock
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Sedation for pediatric radiological procedures: analysis of potential causes of sedation failure and paradoxical reactions.

Authors:  V E Karian; P E Burrows; D Zurakowski; L Connor; K P Mason
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1999-11

6.  Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children.

Authors:  J H Hertzog; H J Dalton; B D Anderson; A T Shad; J E Gootenberg; G J Hauser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children.

Authors:  S Malviya; T Voepel-Lewis; G Prochaska; A R Tait
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric echocardiography: physiologic responses, adverse events, and risk factors.

Authors:  Lisa C Heistein; Claudio Ramaciotti; William A Scott; Melanie Coursey; Paul W Sheeran; Matthew S Lemler
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging.

Authors:  Keira P Mason; Pamela Sanborn; David Zurakowski; Victoria E Karian; Linda Connor; Paulette J Fontaine; Patricia E Burrows
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Lung magnetic resonance imaging for pneumonia in children.

Authors:  Mark C Liszewski; Süreyya Görkem; Kushaljit S Sodhi; Edward Y Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-21

Review 2.  Sedation/anaesthesia in paediatric radiology.

Authors:  Y Arlachov; R H Ganatra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  Ravi Bhargava; Gabriele Hahn; Wolfgang Hirsch; Myung-Joon Kim; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Oystein E Olsen; Eira Stokland; Fabio Triulzi; Elida Vazquez
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-10-20

4.  Efficacy and safety of intravenous thiopental for sedation during magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yunus O Atalay; Tomak Leman; Joseph Drew Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Airway patency in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging using neck collars: a single center, randomized, double-blind, prospective study.

Authors:  Gulseren Yilmaz; Kenan Varol; Osman Esen; Arda Kayhan; Ziya Salihoglu
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-12-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.