AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine whether exenatide improves haemodynamic function in patients with type 2 diabetes with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: The main eligibility criteria for inclusion were: male/female (18-80 years) with type 2 diabetes and CHF (ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Out of 237 patients screened, 20 male type 2 diabetic patients participated in this crossover trial design and were allocated (sequentially numbered) to i.v. infusions during two consecutive days with (1) exenatide (0.12 pmol/kg/min); and (2) placebo for 6 h followed by a washout period for 18 h, at Stockholm South Hospital, Sweden. Patients and researchers were blinded to the assignment. Cardiac haemodynamic variables were determined by right heart catheterisation. The primary endpoint was defined as an increase in cardiac index (CI) or a decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≥ 20%. Secondary endpoints were tolerability and safety of exenatide infusion. RESULTS:CI increased at 3 and 6 h by 0.4 ± 0.1 (23%) and 0.33 ± 0.1 (17%) l min(-1) m(-2), during exenatide infusion vs -0.02 ± 0.1 (-1%) and -0.08 ± 0.1 (-5%) l min(-1) m(-2) during placebo (p = 0.003); and heart rate (HR) increased at 1, 3 and 6 h by 8 ± 3 (11%), 15 ± 4 (21%) and 21 ± 5 (29%) beats per min (bpm), during exenatide infusion vs -1 ± 2 (-2%), 1 ± 1 (2%) and 6 ± 2 (8%) bpm, during placebo (p = 0.006); and PCWP decreased at 1, 3 and 6 h by -1.3 ± 0.8 (-8%), -1.2 ± 1 (-8%) and -2.2 ± 0.9 (-15%) mmHg, during exenatide infusion vs 0.3 ± 0.5 (2%), 1 ± 0.6 (6%) and 1.4 ± 0.7 (8%) mmHg, during placebo (p = 0.001). No serious adverse event was observed. Adverse events were reported in nine patients (six, nausea; two, increased HR; one, increased systolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Infusion of exenatide in male type 2 diabetic patients with CHF increased the CI as a result of chronotropy, with concomitant favourable effects on PCWP and reasonable tolerability of the drug. The clinical implications of using exenatide in patients with CHF are still not clear and further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.isrctn.org/ISRCTN47533126
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine whether exenatide improves haemodynamic function in patients with type 2 diabetes with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: The main eligibility criteria for inclusion were: male/female (18-80 years) with type 2 diabetes and CHF (ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Out of 237 patients screened, 20 male type 2 diabeticpatients participated in this crossover trial design and were allocated (sequentially numbered) to i.v. infusions during two consecutive days with (1) exenatide (0.12 pmol/kg/min); and (2) placebo for 6 h followed by a washout period for 18 h, at Stockholm South Hospital, Sweden. Patients and researchers were blinded to the assignment. Cardiac haemodynamic variables were determined by right heart catheterisation. The primary endpoint was defined as an increase in cardiac index (CI) or a decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≥ 20%. Secondary endpoints were tolerability and safety of exenatide infusion. RESULTS: CI increased at 3 and 6 h by 0.4 ± 0.1 (23%) and 0.33 ± 0.1 (17%) l min(-1) m(-2), during exenatide infusion vs -0.02 ± 0.1 (-1%) and -0.08 ± 0.1 (-5%) l min(-1) m(-2) during placebo (p = 0.003); and heart rate (HR) increased at 1, 3 and 6 h by 8 ± 3 (11%), 15 ± 4 (21%) and 21 ± 5 (29%) beats per min (bpm), during exenatide infusion vs -1 ± 2 (-2%), 1 ± 1 (2%) and 6 ± 2 (8%) bpm, during placebo (p = 0.006); and PCWP decreased at 1, 3 and 6 h by -1.3 ± 0.8 (-8%), -1.2 ± 1 (-8%) and -2.2 ± 0.9 (-15%) mmHg, during exenatide infusion vs 0.3 ± 0.5 (2%), 1 ± 0.6 (6%) and 1.4 ± 0.7 (8%) mmHg, during placebo (p = 0.001). No serious adverse event was observed. Adverse events were reported in nine patients (six, nausea; two, increased HR; one, increased systolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Infusion of exenatide in male type 2 diabeticpatients with CHF increased the CI as a result of chronotropy, with concomitant favourable effects on PCWP and reasonable tolerability of the drug. The clinical implications of using exenatide in patients with CHF are still not clear and further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.isrctn.org/ISRCTN47533126
Authors: M T Slawsky; W S Colucci; S S Gottlieb; B H Greenberg; E Haeusslein; J Hare; S Hutchins; C V Leier; T H LeJemtel; E Loh; J Nicklas; D Ogilby; B N Singh; W Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Philip A Read; Stephen P Hoole; Paul A White; Fakhar Z Khan; Michael O'Sullivan; Nick E J West; David P Dutka Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Nisha Charkoudian; Christopher N Andrews; Michael Camilleri; David Sletten; Alan R Zinsmeister; Phillip A Low Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2008-07-02 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Kenneth B Margulies; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Margaret M Redfield; Monica R Shah; Eugene Braunwald; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Sharmila C Subaran; Matthew A Sauder; Weidong Chai; Linda A Jahn; Dale E Fowler; Kevin W Aylor; Ananda Basu; Zhenqi Liu Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 6.124