PURPOSE: To compare measurements of murine ocular axial lengths (ALs) made with 780 nm partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and 1310 nm spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: AL was measured at postnatal day (P) 58 in C57BL/6J mice. Repeated AL measurements were taken using a custom-made 780 nm PCI and a commercial 1310 nm SD-OCT. Intra- and interuser variability was assessed along the central optical axis and 2-degree off-axes angles with the SD-OCT. Data were collected and analyzed using Cronbach alpha (α), Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability, agreement plots, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: AL measurements agreed well between the two instruments (3.262 ± 0.042 mm for PCI; 3.264 ± 0.047 mm for SD-OCT; n = 20 eyes). The ICC for PCI compared with SD-OCT was 0.92, confirming high agreement between the two instruments. Intrauser ICC for the PCI and SD-OCT were 0.814 and 0.995, respectively. Similarly, interuser ICC for PCI and SD-OCT were 0.970 and 0.943, respectively. Using SD-OCT, a 2-degree misalignment of the eye along the horizontal meridian produced mean differences in AL of -0.002 ± 0.017 mm relative to the centrally aligned images, whereas similar misalignment along the vertical meridian created 0.005 ± 0.018 mm differences in AL measurements. CONCLUSIONS: AL measurements from the 780 nm PCI and 1310 nm SD-OCT correlate well. Multiple statistical indices indicate that both instruments have good precision and agreement for measuring murine ocular AL in vivo. Although the vertical meridian had the greater variability in AL in the small mouse eye; 2-degree off-axes differences were within the SD of centrally aligned AL.
PURPOSE: To compare measurements of murine ocular axial lengths (ALs) made with 780 nm partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and 1310 nm spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS:AL was measured at postnatal day (P) 58 in C57BL/6J mice. Repeated AL measurements were taken using a custom-made 780 nm PCI and a commercial 1310 nm SD-OCT. Intra- and interuser variability was assessed along the central optical axis and 2-degree off-axes angles with the SD-OCT. Data were collected and analyzed using Cronbach alpha (α), Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability, agreement plots, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS:AL measurements agreed well between the two instruments (3.262 ± 0.042 mm for PCI; 3.264 ± 0.047 mm for SD-OCT; n = 20 eyes). The ICC for PCI compared with SD-OCT was 0.92, confirming high agreement between the two instruments. Intrauser ICC for the PCI and SD-OCT were 0.814 and 0.995, respectively. Similarly, interuser ICC for PCI and SD-OCT were 0.970 and 0.943, respectively. Using SD-OCT, a 2-degree misalignment of the eye along the horizontal meridian produced mean differences in AL of -0.002 ± 0.017 mm relative to the centrally aligned images, whereas similar misalignment along the vertical meridian created 0.005 ± 0.018 mm differences in AL measurements. CONCLUSIONS:AL measurements from the 780 nm PCI and 1310 nm SD-OCT correlate well. Multiple statistical indices indicate that both instruments have good precision and agreement for measuring murine ocular AL in vivo. Although the vertical meridian had the greater variability in AL in the small mouse eye; 2-degree off-axes differences were within the SD of centrally aligned AL.
Authors: Joseph Ho; Dinorah P E Castro; Leonardo C Castro; Yueli Chen; Jonathan Liu; Cynthia Mattox; Chandrasekharan Krishnan; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang; Terry L Blasdel; Tammy L Humbird; Kurt H Bockhorst Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: M Dirani; L Tong; G Gazzard; X Zhang; A Chia; T L Young; K A Rose; P Mitchell; S-M Saw Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Ranjay Chakraborty; Han Na Park; Christopher C Tan; Paul Weiss; Megan C Prunty; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Han na Park; Seema B Jabbar; Christopher C Tan; Curran S Sidhu; Jane Abey; Fazila Aseem; Gregor Schmid; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk; Beata Kocyła-Karczmarewicz; Maja Małkowska; Sylwia Łuczak; Katarzyna Iwanicka-Pronicka; Stephanie Siegmund; Hua Yang; Quan Wen; Quan V Hoang; Ronald H Silverman; Paweł Kowalski; Olga Szczypińska; Kamila Czornak; Janusz Zimowski; Rafał Płoski; Jacek Pilch; Elżbieta Ciara; Jacek Zaremba; Małgorzata Krajewska-Walasek; Eric A Schon; Ewa Pronicka Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2015-10-02
Authors: Ranjay Chakraborty; Han Na Park; Adam M Hanif; Curran S Sidhu; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Ranjay Chakraborty; Victoria Yang; Han Na Park; Erica G Landis; Susov Dhakal; Cara T Motz; Michael A Bergen; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 3.467