| Literature DB >> 22246107 |
Tomasz Pniewski1, Józef Kapusta, Piotr Bociąg, Anna Kostrzak, Olga Fedorowicz-Strońska, Marcin Czyż, Michał Gdula, Paweł Krajewski, Bogdan Wolko, Andrzej Płucienniczak.
Abstract
Current immunisation programmes against hepatitis B virus (HBV) increasingly often involve novel tri-component vaccines containing-together with the small (S-HBsAg)-also medium and large surface antigens of HBV (M- and L-HBsAg). Plants producing all HBsAg proteins can be a source of components for a potential oral 'triple' anti-HBV vaccine. The objective of the presented research was to study the potential of M/L-HBsAg expression in leaf tissue and conditions of its processing for a prototype oral vaccine. Tobacco and lettuce carrying M- or L-HBsAg genes and resistant to the herbicide glufosinate were engineered and integration of the transgenes was verified by PCR and Southern hybridizations. M- and L-HBsAg expression was confirmed by Western blot and assayed by ELISA at the level of micrograms per g of fresh weight. The antigens displayed a common S domain and characteristic domains preS2 and preS1 and were assembled into virus-like particles (VLPs). Leaf tissues containing M- and L-HBsAg were lyophilised to produce a starting material of an orally administered vaccine formula. The antigens were distinctly sensitive to freeze-drying conditions and storage temperature, in the aspect of stability of S and preS domains and formation of multimeric particles. Efficiency of lyophilisation and storage depended also on the initial antigen content in plant tissue, yet M-HBsAg appeared to be approximately 1.5-2 times more stable than L-HBsAg. The results of the study provide indications concerning the preparation of two other constituents, next to S-HBsAg, for a plant-derived prototype oral tri-component vaccine against hepatitis B.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22246107 PMCID: PMC3277690 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1223-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Cell Rep ISSN: 0721-7714 Impact factor: 4.570
Fig. 1Organization of T-DNA of binary plasmids pKHBMBAR and pKHBLBAR. M/L-HBs coding sequence of surface antigen of HBV: medium (preS2 and S domains) or large (preS1, preS2 and S domains), in pKHBMBAR or pKHBLBAR, respectively; bar coding sequence of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase; p35S CaMV 35S promoter, pNOS nopaline synthase promoter, NOSt nopaline synthase terminator, g7t g7 terminator; LB and RB left and right T-DNA border sequences
Fig. 2Expression of VLPs and total HBsAg in plants. a Expression of M-HBsAg in tobacco plants of 6- and 18-months of age, b expression of M-HBsAg in lettuce plants of T0 and T1 generation, c expression of L-HBsAg in tobacco plants of 6- and 18-months of age, d expression of L-HBsAg in lettuce plants of T0 and T1 generation. Plants were divided into three expression groups, depending on total HBsAg content calculated in μg/g of fresh weight (FW): low < 2 μg/g FW, medium 2–10 μg/g FW and high > 10 μg/g FW. Level of both VLP-assembled antigens was determined by monoclonal IMx® diagnostic kit (Abbott). Total contents of the antigens were determined by sandwich ELISA using anti-HBsAg rabbit polyclonal antibody (B65811R, Meridian Life Science) and monoclonal antibodies specific for S, preS2 or preS1 domains (respectively, C86123 M and C8A031 M, Meridian Life Science, and 5a-19, Institut Pasteur). Data show values calculated as the arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) from three assays
Fig. 3Western blot analysis of M-HBsAg in lettuce (a) and L-HBsAg in tobacco (b) using monoclonal antibodies specific for preS2 or preS1 domains. Lanes: M protein molecular weight marker (MBI Fermentas), 1E/4–18A/8 or 2–28 analyzed lettuce or tobacco plants, respectively, N non-transgenic plant (negative control), P M-HBsAg or L-HBsAg, respectively (positive control, University of Ulm, Germany). Arrows indicate non-glycosylated (p31 M-HBsAg, p39 L-HBsAg) and putative glycosylated (gp34 M-HBsAg, gp42 L-HBsAg) proteins of HBsAg antigens. M- and L-HBsAg proteins were detected using anti-preS2 (C8A031 M, Meridian Life Science) or anti-preS1 (5a-19, Institut Pasteur) monoclonal antibodies
Lyophilisation efficiency—antigens preserved directly after freeze-drying had been completed (day 0 of storage), in materials coming from plants attributed to particular expression groups: low <2 μg/g FW, medium 2–10 μg/g FW and high >10 μg/g FW
| Antigen | Content in initial fresh tissue (μg/g) | Antigen preservation in lyophilised tissue | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute content (μg/g) | Relative content (%) | ||||||||
| Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | |
| M-HBsAg | |||||||||
| S domain | 1.8 | 4.2 | 9.8 | 24.5 | 26.1 | 34.2 | 94.3 | 43.6 | 24.5 |
| preS2 domain | 1.3 | 3.8 | 9.0 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 9.1 | 40.1 | 14.8 | 7.1 |
| VLPs | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 5.5 | 14.6 | 13.2 | 48.2 | 93.8 |
| L-HBsAg | |||||||||
| S domain | 1.0 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 13.3 | 16.2 | 15.9 | 94.2 | 37.2 | 19.6 |
| preS1 domain | 0.6 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 7.7 | 91.8 | 19.8 | 13.1 |
| VLPs | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 95.9 | 33.9 | 38.2 |
Antigen content in fresh tissue is a mean from 6 to 8 plants of T1 generation used for lyophilisation; the antigen content in T1 generation decreased in comparison to T0 generation, when expression groups were distinguished
Relative content calculated as a ratio of obtained value and theoretical value, if whole antigen would be preserved and assuming that dry mass accounts for 7% of leaf fresh weight; dry mass determined using the gravimetric method (May et al. 1989)
Mean values of M-HBsAg and L-HBsAg content in lyophilised tissue, grouped according to day of storage (30, 90) and antigen domain (S domain, preS) or VLP form, with least significant differences calculated for categories: combination of antigen content in source plants × storage temperature
| Day | Antigen domain/form | Temperature (°C) | M-HBsAg content (μg/g) in tissue derived from plant expression groups | LSD ( | L-HBsAg content (μg/g) in tissue derived from plant expression groups | LSD ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | |||||
| 30 | S | 4 | 9.49 | 12.81 | 21.09 | n.s. | 6.68 | 6.42 | 9.15 | n.s. |
| 22 | 11.43 | 22.82 | 27.70 | 12.91 | 15.34 | 12.91 | ||||
| 37 | 11.60 | 17.41 | 17.07 | 13.07 | 15.90 | 12.77 | ||||
| preS | 4 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 1.71 | 2.78 | 4.00 | 2.66 | n.s. | |
| 22 | 1.19 | 1.36 | 3.53a | 2.34 | 3.73 | 3.04 | ||||
| 37 | 2.00a | 3.20a | 3.70a | 2.88 | 3.66 | 2.93 | ||||
| VLP | 4 | 0.41 | 0.98 | 1.69 | 0.97 | 1.33 | 1.34 | 1.00 | n.s. | |
| 22 | 0.70 | 1.35 | 5.79b | 1.35 | 1.16 | 1.14 | ||||
| 37 | 0.60 | 1.53 | 3.80 | 1.40 | 1.32 | 1.12 | ||||
| 90 | S | 4 | 0.80 | 2.39 | 3.41 | 7.05 | 2.39 | 2.88 | 1.00 | 3.54 |
| 22 | 10.40c | 14.98c | 14.98c | 7.32a | 5.13 | 2.56 | ||||
| 37 | 6.35 | 7.47 | 10.09c | 9.43a | 10.11a | 9.43a | ||||
| preS | 4 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.58 | 0.37 | 1.15 | 0.22 | 1.68 | |
| 22 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 1.53d | 2.34b | 3.73b | 1.40 | ||||
| 37 | 0.25 | 1.45d | 1.95d | 0.72 | 2.88b | 0.90 | ||||
| VLP | 4 | 0.04 | 0.41 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 0.76c | 0.78c | 0.44 | 0.31 | |
| 22 | 0.18 | 0.63 | 1.95e | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.11 | ||||
| 37 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.14 | ||||
Categories with the largest means, determined according to the Fisher’s protected least significant difference test, are marked by letter indexes, separately for M- and L-HBsAg
LSD least significant difference at p = 0.05; n.s. not significant differences, here differences among nine combinations; preS preS2 for M-HBsAg, preS1 for L-HBsAg
Antigen content in source plants attributed to expression groups: low < 2 μg/g FW, medium 2–10 μg/g FW, high > 10 μg/g FW