Literature DB >> 22245900

Cost-effectiveness of semi-annual surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients of the Italian Liver Cancer population.

Alessandro Cucchetti1, Franco Trevisani, Matteo Cescon, Giorgio Ercolani, Fabio Farinati, Paolo Del Poggio, Gianludovico Rapaccini, Maria Anna Di Nolfo, Luisa Benvegnù, Marco Zoli, Franco Borzio, Edoardo Giovanni Giannini, Eugenio Caturelli, Maria Chiaramonte, Antonio Daniele Pinna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It was recently shown that semi-annual surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients provides a prognostic advantage over the annual program; however, its cost-effectiveness (CE) in the general cirrhotic population still needs to be defined.
METHODS: A Markov model was built to compare CE of these two strategies, considering literature results and treatment modalities of 918 cirrhotic patients from the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) database.
RESULTS: Results from the Markov model suggest that, compared to annual surveillance, semi-annual surveillance leads to a gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy, in an unselected cirrhotic population, of 1.35 quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) over 10 years since surveillance start in compensated patients, and of 0.73 QALMs in decompensated patients. Semi-annual surveillance was more cost-effective in compensated than in decompensated cirrhosis, with an incremental CE ratio (ICER) of 1997 and 3814€/QALM, respectively. In compensated cirrhosis, semi-annual surveillance was more cost-effective than the annual program when the annual HCC incidence was ≥3.2% and the relative survival gain after cancer diagnosis was ≥20% with respect to the annual program. In decompensated cirrhosis, semi-annual surveillance was cost-effective in patients amenable to liver transplantation. In both groups, CE of semi-annual surveillance improved with the increase of annual incidence and the survival benefit obtainable with HCC treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Both surveillance strategies for HCC in cirrhotic patients can be recommended, according to the individual risk profile for HCC occurrence and the expected survival gain obtainable after tumor diagnosis and therapy. Copyright Â
© 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245900     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  17 in total

1.  Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does the Place Where Ultrasound Is Performed Impact Its Effectiveness?

Authors:  Federico Piñero; Fernando Rubinstein; Sebastián Marciano; Nora Fernández; Jorge Silva; Yanina Zambelo; Margarita Anders; Alina Zerega; Ezequiel Ridruejo; Carlos Miguez; Beatriz Ameigeiras; Claudia D'Amico; Luis Gaite; Carla Bermúdez; Carlos Rosales; Gustavo Romero; Lucas McCormack; Virginia Reggiardo; Luis Colombato; Adrián Gadano; Marcelo Silva
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Healthcare Costs Related to Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Veterans With Cirrhosis in the United States.

Authors:  David E Kaplan; Michael K Chapko; Rajni Mehta; Feng Dai; Melissa Skanderson; Ayse Aytaman; Michelle Baytarian; Kathryn D'Addeo; Rena Fox; Kristel Hunt; Christine Pocha; Adriana Valderrama; Tamar H Taddei
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  Economic Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Treatment: A Guide for Clinicians.

Authors:  Alisa Likhitsup; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Management of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options.

Authors:  P A Cortesi; A Ciaccio; M Rota; J K Lim; S De Salvia; S Okolicsanyi; M Vinci; L S Belli; L G Mantovani; M Strazzabosco
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.728

5.  Delayed Diagnosis of HCC with Chronic Alcoholic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Kerstin Schütte; Jan Bornschein; Stefan Kahl; Ricarda Seidensticker; Jörg Arend; Jens Ricke; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Should Be Screened for Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Theodore Alper; Ernesto Sernas; Paridhima Pruthi; Mikhail A Alper; Vinay Sundaram
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Prevalence of extra-hepatic incidental findings on ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Allison Forrest; Sam Afshari; Nathan Franssen; Naiim Ali
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-22

Review 8.  Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS Algorithm.

Authors:  Shuchi K Rodgers; David T Fetzer; Helena Gabriel; James H Seow; Hailey H Choi; Katherine E Maturen; Ashish P Wasnik; Tara A Morgan; Nirvikar Dahiya; Mary K O'Boyle; Yuko Kono; Claude B Sirlin; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Prospective screening increases the detection of potentially curable hepatocellular carcinoma: results in 8,900 high-risk patients.

Authors:  Francesco Izzo; Mauro Piccirillo; Vittorio Albino; Raffaele Palaia; Andrea Belli; Vincenza Granata; Sergio Setola; Roberta Fusco; Antonella Petrillo; Raffaele Orlando; Grazia Tosone; Fabrizio Scordino; Steven A Curley
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Surveillance for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: how best to do it?

Authors:  Edoardo G Giannini; Alessandro Cucchetti; Virginia Erroi; Francesca Garuti; Federica Odaldi; Franco Trevisani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.