Literature DB >> 22245818

Normal range of motion of hip and ankle in Indian population.

Sudhir Kumar1, Renu Sharma, Divesh Gulati, Ish K Dhammi, Aditya N Aggarwal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most studies that determine the range of motion of joints of the lower limbs study the Western population. The Asian population differs significantly, as daily activities demand different sitting positions. Our study aimed to establish the normal values of hip and ankle range of motion in various age groups in the Indian population and the effect of various functional positions of the hip on range of motion.
METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-six Indian subjects, between the ages of 1 month to 75 years, were randomly selected for measurement of the range of motion of the hip and ankle joint. Exclusion criteria included history of injury or disease related to the lower extremities. Changes with age in the arc of joint motion were studied. The influence of various functional positions of the lower limb on the range of motion of the hip and the effect of weight-bearing on the ankle joint range of motion were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Hip range of motion differed in various positions. Hip rotations were significantly greater when measured with the knee in flexion in both the sitting and prone positions than in the supine position. The arc of hip rotation was highest in the prone position. A significant increase in the arc of ankle dorsiflexion was found in a weight-bearing (squatting) position. Age related reduction in movement was found mainly in the rotations of the hip and dorsiflexion of the ankle.
CONCLUSION: The data compiled in this study on the range of motion in the hip and ankle joint of the Indian population will be useful in the evaluation of patients with disorders of these joints, especially in the Indian and Asian population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22245818     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  6 in total

1.  Clinical and instrumented measurements of hip laxity and their associations with knee laxity and general joint laxity.

Authors:  Lixia Fan; Timothy J Copple; Amanda J Tritsch; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Range of Motion of the Ankle According to Pushing Force, Gender and Knee Position.

Authors:  Kang Hee Cho; Yumi Jeon; Hyunkeun Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-04-25

3.  Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Richard C Mather; Shane J Nho; John P Salvo; Allston J Stubbs; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Andrew B Wolff; John J Christoforetti; Thomas J Ellis; Dean K Matsuda; Benjamin R Kivlan; Dominic S Carreira
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-12-12

4.  Less hip range of motion is associated with a greater alpha angle in people with longstanding hip and groin pain.

Authors:  August Estberger; Anders Pålsson; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Eva Ageberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Psychometric Assessment of Modified Harris Hip Score for Femoral Neck Fracture in Indian Population.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Shahrukh Khan Ataullah Pathan; Ravi Chandulal Makadia; Chintan Bahecharbhai Chaudhary
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Comparison of Post-Operative Muscular Strength Between Gamma Nailing and Hemiarthroplasty System in Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Noda; Yasuhiro Saegusa; Masayasu Takahashi; Chisa Noguchi; Chihiro Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Mikami; Akira Gotouda
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.