INTRODUCTION: We have recently introduced the use of mammalian cardiac tissue slices for in vitro drug testing purposes. Here we show how this method can be applied for long-term studies in safety pharmacology. METHODS: In freshly prepared cardiac slices from guinea-pig or rat ventricle, extracellular field potentials (FP) and intracellular action potentials (AP) were recorded in response to electrical stimulation using the 4-channel heart slice screening system 'Synchroslice'. To assess viability of the slices on consecutive days after preparation, drug effects on FP/AP parameters, like duration and latency, were monitored. RESULTS: In the presence of the potassium channel blocker E4031 (1 μM), FP and AP duration (FPD and APD) were significantly increased (FPD, 39.0%; APD, 28.1%) in guinea-pig ventricular slices. Similar changes were observed 24-28 h after slice preparation (FPD, 48.6%; APD, 25.4%). Furthermore, AP duration was reduced in the presence of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (10 μM) on the day of preparation (40.5%) and 24-28 h later (38.7%). In contrast, in the presence of the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (30 mM) AP duration was prolonged 4.95 and 4.19-fold, 2-8 h and 24-28 h after preparation, respectively. Finally, FP propagation was repeatedly slowed down by the gap junction blocker carbenoxolone (30 μM), as revealed from FP onset latency increases observed on three consecutive days (2-8 h after preparation, 93.0%; 24-28 h, 76.8%, 48-56 h, 61.7%). DISCUSSION: Freshly isolated cardiac slices reproduced established physiological and pharmacological responses for more than 24 h after preparation. Thus, cardiac slices can be used for several days after preparation which makes them a robust model for electrophysiological studies. We propose that cardiac slices can become a versatile tool in heart research and risk assessment of drugs.
INTRODUCTION: We have recently introduced the use of mammalian cardiac tissue slices for in vitro drug testing purposes. Here we show how this method can be applied for long-term studies in safety pharmacology. METHODS: In freshly prepared cardiac slices from guinea-pig or rat ventricle, extracellular field potentials (FP) and intracellular action potentials (AP) were recorded in response to electrical stimulation using the 4-channel heart slice screening system 'Synchroslice'. To assess viability of the slices on consecutive days after preparation, drug effects on FP/AP parameters, like duration and latency, were monitored. RESULTS: In the presence of the potassium channel blocker E4031 (1 μM), FP and AP duration (FPD and APD) were significantly increased (FPD, 39.0%; APD, 28.1%) in guinea-pig ventricular slices. Similar changes were observed 24-28 h after slice preparation (FPD, 48.6%; APD, 25.4%). Furthermore, AP duration was reduced in the presence of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (10 μM) on the day of preparation (40.5%) and 24-28 h later (38.7%). In contrast, in the presence of the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (30 mM) AP duration was prolonged 4.95 and 4.19-fold, 2-8 h and 24-28 h after preparation, respectively. Finally, FP propagation was repeatedly slowed down by the gap junction blocker carbenoxolone (30 μM), as revealed from FP onset latency increases observed on three consecutive days (2-8 h after preparation, 93.0%; 24-28 h, 76.8%, 48-56 h, 61.7%). DISCUSSION: Freshly isolated cardiac slices reproduced established physiological and pharmacological responses for more than 24 h after preparation. Thus, cardiac slices can be used for several days after preparation which makes them a robust model for electrophysiological studies. We propose that cardiac slices can become a versatile tool in heart research and risk assessment of drugs.
Authors: Guy Page; Phachareeya Ratchada; Yannick Miron; Guido Steiner; Andre Ghetti; Paul E Miller; Jack A Reynolds; Ken Wang; Andrea Greiter-Wilke; Liudmila Polonchuk; Martin Traebert; Gary A Gintant; Najah Abi-Gerges Journal: J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Lyudmyla Borysova; Y Y Hanson Ng; Edward S Wragg; Lillian E Wallis; Emily Fay; Raimondo Ascione; Kim A Dora Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Nupura S Bhise; João Ribas; Vijayan Manoharan; Yu Shrike Zhang; Alessandro Polini; Solange Massa; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini Journal: J Control Release Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Ken Wang; Peter Lee; Gary R Mirams; Padmini Sarathchandra; Thomas K Borg; David J Gavaghan; Peter Kohl; Christian Bollensdorff Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Filippo Perbellini; Samuel A Watson; Martina Scigliano; Samha Alayoubi; Sebastian Tkach; Ifigeneia Bardi; Nicholas Quaife; Christopher Kane; Neil P Dufton; André Simon; Markus B Sikkel; Giuseppe Faggian; Anna M Randi; Julia Gorelik; Sian E Harding; Cesare M Terracciano Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 10.787