Literature DB >> 22245351

Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?

David G Norris1.   

Abstract

Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fMRI are presented: HASTE, SSFP, RASER and most importantly spin-echo EPI. Their relative merits and limitations are discussed. The BOLD contrast mechanisms responsible for spin echo fMRI are summarised, and the spatial origin of the signal within the neocortex discussed. The major publications concerning the use of spin echo fMRI are examined. At present the most promising application for this methodology would appear to be in the examination of cortical layers and columns. The balance of experimental and theoretical evidence accumulated to date leads the author to propose that: (i) There is little point in conducting spin-echo fMRI at main magnetic field strengths of 3T and below; (ii) There are fundamental limitations to acquiring spin-echo BOLD data at 7T and above; (iii) Whole brain coverage with SE-BOLD at very high static magnetic field strengths could prove valuable; and (iv) SE-BOLD is probably better suited to study cortical columns than cortical layers. Recently gradient-echo approaches for high spatial resolution fMRI have been demonstrated that employ special techniques to avoid the effects of larger post capillary vessels. The coming years will show whether spin-echo techniques can remain the method of choice for high spatial resolution studies, and whether they can extend their range of application at 7T and above.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245351     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  34 in total

1.  Frequency preference and attention effects across cortical depths in the human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Federico De Martino; Michelle Moerel; Kamil Ugurbil; Rainer Goebel; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The future of acquisition speed, coverage, sensitivity, and resolution.

Authors:  Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Fat-suppressed alternating-SSFP for whole-brain fMRI using breath-hold and visual stimulus paradigms.

Authors:  Tiffany Jou; Steve Patterson; John M Pauly; Chris V Bowen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Modeling and suppression of respiration induced B0-fluctuations in non-balanced steady-state free precession sequences at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Pål Erik Goa; Benedikt Andreas Poser; Markus Barth
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Neuronal or hemodynamic? Grappling with the functional MRI signal.

Authors:  Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Brain-heart interactions: challenges and opportunities with functional magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high field.

Authors:  Catie Chang; Erika P Raven; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  BOLD fMRI in awake prairie voles: A platform for translational social and affective neuroscience.

Authors:  J R Yee; W M Kenkel; P Kulkarni; K Moore; A M Perkeybile; S Toddes; J A Amacker; C S Carter; C F Ferris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Intracortical depth analyses of frequency-sensitive regions of human auditory cortex using 7TfMRI.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Wei-Tang Chang; Samantha Huang; Boris Keil; Norbert Kopco; Stephanie Rossi; Giorgio Bonmassar; Thomas Witzel; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Whole-brain three-dimensional T2-weighted BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Jun Hua; Qin Qin; Peter C M van Zijl; James J Pekar; Craig K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Comparison of BOLD and CBV using 3D EPI and 3D GRASE for cortical layer functional MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Alexander J S Beckett; Tetiana Dadakova; Jennifer Townsend; Laurentius Huber; Suhyung Park; David A Feinberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.