Literature DB >> 22245209

Proton therapy for spinal ependymomas: planning, acute toxicities, and preliminary outcomes.

Mark J Amsbaugh1, David R Grosshans, Mary Frances McAleer, Ron Zhu, Cody Wages, Cody N Crawford, Matthew Palmer, Beth De Gracia, Shiao Woo, Anita Mahajan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report acute toxicities and preliminary outcomes for pediatric patients with ependymomas of the spine treated with proton beam therapy at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight pediatric patients received proton beam irradiation between October 2006 and September 2010 for spinal ependymomas. Toxicity data were collected weekly during radiation therapy and all follow-up visits. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
RESULTS: All patients had surgical resection of the tumor before irradiation (7 subtotal resection and 1 gross total resection). Six patients had World Health Organization Grade I ependymomas, and two had World Health Organization Grade II ependymomas. Patients had up to 3 surgical interventions before radiation therapy (range, 1-3; median, 1). Three patients received proton therapy after recurrence and five as part of their primary management. The entire vertebral body was treated in all but 2 patients. The mean radiation dose was 51.1 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 45 to 54 cobalt gray equivalents). With a mean follow-up of 26 months from the radiation therapy start date (range, 7-51 months), local control, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were all 100%. The most common toxicities during treatment were Grade 1 or 2 erythema (75%) and Grade 1 fatigue (38%). No patients had a Grade 3 or higher adverse event. Proton therapy dramatically reduced dose to all normal tissues anterior to the vertebral bodies in comparison to photon therapy.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary outcomes show the expected control rates with favorable acute toxicity profiles. Proton beam therapy offers a powerful treatment option in the pediatric population, where adverse events related to radiation exposure are of concern. Extended follow-up will be required to assess for late recurrences and long-term adverse effects. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245209     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord ependymoma: a review of the literature and case series of ten patients.

Authors:  Emma Celano; Arsalaan Salehani; James G Malcolm; Erik Reinertsen; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Describing Symptom Burden and Functional Status at the Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

Authors:  Julie Walker; Barbara O'Brien; Elizabeth Vera; Terri Armstrong
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Myxopapillary ependymoma: a SEER analysis of epidemiology and outcomes.

Authors:  James E Bates; Gyujae Choi; Michael T Milano
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  New strategies in radiation therapy: exploiting the full potential of protons.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Anita Mahajan; Bruce D Minsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Biology and management of ependymomas.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Proton versus conventional radiotherapy for pediatric salivary gland tumors: Acute toxicity and dosimetric characteristics.

Authors:  Stephen R Grant; David R Grosshans; Stephen D Bilton; John A Garcia; Mayank Amin; Mark S Chambers; Susan L McGovern; Mary F McAleer; William H Morrison; Winston W Huh; Michael E Kupferman; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  The role of image-guided intensity modulated proton therapy in glioma.

Authors:  David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan; Vinai Gondi; Helen A Shih; Anita Mahajan; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Paediatric proton therapy.

Authors:  Heike Thomas; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Pediatric spinal intramedullary anaplastic myxopapillary ependymoma: a case report.

Authors:  S Joy Trybula; Nitin R Wadhwani; Laila M Mohammad; Sandi K Lam; Alicia C Lenzen; Tord D Alden
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.