Oleg N Vassiliev1. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Oleg.Vassiliev@albertahealthservices.ca
Abstract
PURPOSE: We proposed a formulation of the multi-hit single-target model in which the Poisson distribution of hits was replaced by a combination of two distributions: one for the number of particles entering the target and one for the number of hits a particle entering the target produces. Such an approach reflects the fact that radiation damage is a result of two different random processes: particle emission by a radiation source and interaction of particles with matter inside the target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Poisson distribution is well justified for the first of the two processes. The second distribution depends on how a hit is defined. To test our approach, we assumed that the second distribution was also a Poisson distribution. The two distributions combined resulted in a non-Poisson distribution. We tested the proposed model by comparing it with previously reported data for DNA single- and double-strand breaks induced by protons and electrons, for survival of a range of cell lines, and variation of the initial slopes of survival curves with radiation quality for heavy-ion beams. RESULTS: Analysis of cell survival equations for this new model showed that they had realistic properties overall, such as the initial and high-dose slopes of survival curves, the shoulder, and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) In most cases tested, a better fit of survival curves was achieved with the new model than with the linear-quadratic model. The results also suggested that the proposed approach may extend the multi-hit model beyond its traditional role in analysis of survival curves to predicting effects of radiation quality and analysis of DNA strand breaks. CONCLUSIONS: Our model, although conceptually simple, performed well in all tests. The model was able to consistently fit data for both cell survival and DNA single- and double-strand breaks. It correctly predicted the dependence of radiation effects on parameters of radiation quality.
PURPOSE: We proposed a formulation of the multi-hit single-target model in which the Poisson distribution of hits was replaced by a combination of two distributions: one for the number of particles entering the target and one for the number of hits a particle entering the target produces. Such an approach reflects the fact that radiation damage is a result of two different random processes: particle emission by a radiation source and interaction of particles with matter inside the target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Poisson distribution is well justified for the first of the two processes. The second distribution depends on how a hit is defined. To test our approach, we assumed that the second distribution was also a Poisson distribution. The two distributions combined resulted in a non-Poisson distribution. We tested the proposed model by comparing it with previously reported data for DNA single- and double-strand breaks induced by protons and electrons, for survival of a range of cell lines, and variation of the initial slopes of survival curves with radiation quality for heavy-ion beams. RESULTS: Analysis of cell survival equations for this new model showed that they had realistic properties overall, such as the initial and high-dose slopes of survival curves, the shoulder, and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) In most cases tested, a better fit of survival curves was achieved with the new model than with the linear-quadratic model. The results also suggested that the proposed approach may extend the multi-hit model beyond its traditional role in analysis of survival curves to predicting effects of radiation quality and analysis of DNA strand breaks. CONCLUSIONS: Our model, although conceptually simple, performed well in all tests. The model was able to consistently fit data for both cell survival and DNA single- and double-strand breaks. It correctly predicted the dependence of radiation effects on parameters of radiation quality.
Authors: Oleg N Vassiliev; Christine B Peterson; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Debomoy K Lahiri; Bryan Maloney; Baindu L Bayon; Nipun Chopra; Fletcher A White; Nigel H Greig; John I Nurnberger Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 4.778
Authors: Stephan Scheidegger; Hans U Fuchs; Kathrin Zaugg; Stephan Bodis; Rudolf M Füchslin Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Mathias S Weyland; Pauline Thumser-Henner; Katarzyna J Nytko; Carla Rohrer Bley; Simone Ulzega; Alke Petri-Fink; Marco Lattuada; Rudolf M Füchslin; Stephan Scheidegger Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.238